Odd Couple: Coming to Terms with Knowledge Management

Mats Alvesson, Dan Kärreman

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The idea of knowledge management draws currently much attention, both among practitioners and scholars. Advocates of the term argue that knowledge management points to a new set of phenomena and practices for managers to learn and master. In particular knowledge management focuses on the creation and distribution of knowledge in organizations through technological novelties such as the internet, intranets, and e‐mail, although there are also streams concentrating on social relations and interactions. This paper examines several possible conceptualizations of the idea of knowledge management. It is argued that knowledge is an ambiguous, unspecific and dynamic phenomenon, intrinsically related to meaning, understanding and process, and therefore difficult to manage. There is thus a contradiction between knowledge and management. Drawing from a literature review and a case study, it is suggested that knowledge management is as likely, if not more so, to operate as a practice of managing people or information than as a practice attuned towards facilitating knowledge creation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Volume38
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)995-1018
Number of pages24
ISSN0022-2380
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{895ebcdb1fdd41a99454ef9de618e8dd,
title = "Odd Couple: Coming to Terms with Knowledge Management",
abstract = "The idea of knowledge management draws currently much attention, both among practitioners and scholars. Advocates of the term argue that knowledge management points to a new set of phenomena and practices for managers to learn and master. In particular knowledge management focuses on the creation and distribution of knowledge in organizations through technological novelties such as the internet, intranets, and e‐mail, although there are also streams concentrating on social relations and interactions. This paper examines several possible conceptualizations of the idea of knowledge management. It is argued that knowledge is an ambiguous, unspecific and dynamic phenomenon, intrinsically related to meaning, understanding and process, and therefore difficult to manage. There is thus a contradiction between knowledge and management. Drawing from a literature review and a case study, it is suggested that knowledge management is as likely, if not more so, to operate as a practice of managing people or information than as a practice attuned towards facilitating knowledge creation.",
author = "Mats Alvesson and Dan K{\"a}rreman",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1111/1467-6486.00269",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "995--1018",
journal = "Journal of Management Studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "7",

}

Odd Couple : Coming to Terms with Knowledge Management . / Alvesson, Mats; Kärreman, Dan.

In: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2001, p. 995-1018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Odd Couple

T2 - Coming to Terms with Knowledge Management

AU - Alvesson, Mats

AU - Kärreman, Dan

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The idea of knowledge management draws currently much attention, both among practitioners and scholars. Advocates of the term argue that knowledge management points to a new set of phenomena and practices for managers to learn and master. In particular knowledge management focuses on the creation and distribution of knowledge in organizations through technological novelties such as the internet, intranets, and e‐mail, although there are also streams concentrating on social relations and interactions. This paper examines several possible conceptualizations of the idea of knowledge management. It is argued that knowledge is an ambiguous, unspecific and dynamic phenomenon, intrinsically related to meaning, understanding and process, and therefore difficult to manage. There is thus a contradiction between knowledge and management. Drawing from a literature review and a case study, it is suggested that knowledge management is as likely, if not more so, to operate as a practice of managing people or information than as a practice attuned towards facilitating knowledge creation.

AB - The idea of knowledge management draws currently much attention, both among practitioners and scholars. Advocates of the term argue that knowledge management points to a new set of phenomena and practices for managers to learn and master. In particular knowledge management focuses on the creation and distribution of knowledge in organizations through technological novelties such as the internet, intranets, and e‐mail, although there are also streams concentrating on social relations and interactions. This paper examines several possible conceptualizations of the idea of knowledge management. It is argued that knowledge is an ambiguous, unspecific and dynamic phenomenon, intrinsically related to meaning, understanding and process, and therefore difficult to manage. There is thus a contradiction between knowledge and management. Drawing from a literature review and a case study, it is suggested that knowledge management is as likely, if not more so, to operate as a practice of managing people or information than as a practice attuned towards facilitating knowledge creation.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-6486.00269

DO - 10.1111/1467-6486.00269

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 995

EP - 1018

JO - Journal of Management Studies

JF - Journal of Management Studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 7

ER -