No Effect of Writing Advice on Reading Comprehension

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

102 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article considers text comprehension through the integrated perspectives of language processing research and practical writing advice as expressed in writing guides and language policies. Such guides for instance include advice to use active constructions instead of passives and sentences instead of nominalizations. These recommended and problem constructions and two other contrasts were investigated in an eye-tracking experiment where 27 students read four authentic texts where the target constructions had been manipulated. A mixed-effects regression analysis showed no difference between recommended and problem constructions, while several control variables were significant. This result indicates that the linguistic manipulations are not in themselves crucial to text comprehension, and it is hypothesized that the central aspect for text comprehension is how the linguistic manipulations support cohesion and coherence in the text.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Technical Writing and Communication
Volume48
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)104-122
Number of pages19
ISSN0047-2816
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Published online: 26. March 2017

Keywords

  • Discourse processing
  • Eye tracking
  • Text comprehension
  • Writing advice

Cite this