New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The chapter explores some of the reforms of the public administration as a bureaucratic institution of government that have accompanied the rise of the New Public Management and Network Governance, and examines their consequences for the relationship between ‘person’ and ‘office’ in the practice of governmental administration. Although, Boltanski and Chiapello have little to say on the topic of public management reform, in itself something of a lacuna in their project, the chapter seeks to make connections, and draw some distinctions, too, with the analysis of the New Spirit of Capitalism that they they proffer. In so doing, the chapter draws attention to the manner in which bureaucratic practices in governmental administration, routinely represented as ‘anachronistic’ by contemporary reformers, can be seen to provide some useful illustrations of the ‘conservation standards’ appropriate to the political management of the state, including the management of ‘change ‘within the state. The chapter suggests that there is not only a suppleness and integrity to the practices of hierarchical bureaucracy that often eludes the gaze of its critics, but also that bureaucracy itself in producing predictability in a state's decisions, actually enhances, indeed, even constitutes, the freedom and flexibility of those operating within the state's field of vision.


The chapter explores some of the reforms of the public administration as a bureaucratic institution of government that have accompanied the rise of the New Public Management and Network Governance, and examines their consequences for the relationship between ‘person’ and ‘office’ in the practice of governmental administration. Although, Boltanski and Chiapello have little to say on the topic of public management reform, in itself something of a lacuna in their project, the chapter seeks to make connections, and draw some distinctions, too, with the analysis of the New Spirit of Capitalism that they they proffer. In so doing, the chapter draws attention to the manner in which bureaucratic practices in governmental administration, routinely represented as ‘anachronistic’ by contemporary reformers, can be seen to provide some useful illustrations of the ‘conservation standards’ appropriate to the political management of the state, including the management of ‘change ‘within the state. The chapter suggests that there is not only a suppleness and integrity to the practices of hierarchical bureaucracy that often eludes the gaze of its critics, but also that bureaucracy itself in producing predictability in a state's decisions, actually enhances, indeed, even constitutes, the freedom and flexibility of those operating within the state's field of vision.


LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationNew Spirits of Capitalism : Crises, Justifications, and Dynamics
EditorsPaul du Gay, Glenn Morgan
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Date2013
Pages274-293
Chapter12
ISBN (Print)9780199595341
ISBN (Electronic)9780191750755
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

    Cite this

    du Gay, P. (2013). New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’. In P. D. Gay, & G. Morgan (Eds.), New Spirits of Capitalism: Crises, Justifications, and Dynamics (pp. 274-293). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.003.0012
    du Gay, Paul. / New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’. New Spirits of Capitalism: Crises, Justifications, and Dynamics. editor / Paul du Gay ; Glenn Morgan. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2013. pp. 274-293
    @inbook{d0653bf8bf924cee9ccfbb028b22b8cb,
    title = "New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’",
    abstract = "The chapter explores some of the reforms of the public administration as a bureaucratic institution of government that have accompanied the rise of the New Public Management and Network Governance, and examines their consequences for the relationship between ‘person’ and ‘office’ in the practice of governmental administration. Although, Boltanski and Chiapello have little to say on the topic of public management reform, in itself something of a lacuna in their project, the chapter seeks to make connections, and draw some distinctions, too, with the analysis of the New Spirit of Capitalism that they they proffer. In so doing, the chapter draws attention to the manner in which bureaucratic practices in governmental administration, routinely represented as ‘anachronistic’ by contemporary reformers, can be seen to provide some useful illustrations of the ‘conservation standards’ appropriate to the political management of the state, including the management of ‘change ‘within the state. The chapter suggests that there is not only a suppleness and integrity to the practices of hierarchical bureaucracy that often eludes the gaze of its critics, but also that bureaucracy itself in producing predictability in a state's decisions, actually enhances, indeed, even constitutes, the freedom and flexibility of those operating within the state's field of vision.",
    keywords = "Weber, Bureaucracy, Office, Person, New Public Management, State, Freedom",
    author = "{du Gay}, Paul",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.003.0012",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9780199595341",
    pages = "274--293",
    editor = "Gay, {Paul du} and Glenn Morgan",
    booktitle = "New Spirits of Capitalism",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    du Gay, P 2013, New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’. in PD Gay & G Morgan (eds), New Spirits of Capitalism: Crises, Justifications, and Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 274-293. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.003.0012

    New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’. / du Gay, Paul.

    New Spirits of Capitalism: Crises, Justifications, and Dynamics. ed. / Paul du Gay; Glenn Morgan. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 274-293.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’

    AU - du Gay,Paul

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - The chapter explores some of the reforms of the public administration as a bureaucratic institution of government that have accompanied the rise of the New Public Management and Network Governance, and examines their consequences for the relationship between ‘person’ and ‘office’ in the practice of governmental administration. Although, Boltanski and Chiapello have little to say on the topic of public management reform, in itself something of a lacuna in their project, the chapter seeks to make connections, and draw some distinctions, too, with the analysis of the New Spirit of Capitalism that they they proffer. In so doing, the chapter draws attention to the manner in which bureaucratic practices in governmental administration, routinely represented as ‘anachronistic’ by contemporary reformers, can be seen to provide some useful illustrations of the ‘conservation standards’ appropriate to the political management of the state, including the management of ‘change ‘within the state. The chapter suggests that there is not only a suppleness and integrity to the practices of hierarchical bureaucracy that often eludes the gaze of its critics, but also that bureaucracy itself in producing predictability in a state's decisions, actually enhances, indeed, even constitutes, the freedom and flexibility of those operating within the state's field of vision.

    AB - The chapter explores some of the reforms of the public administration as a bureaucratic institution of government that have accompanied the rise of the New Public Management and Network Governance, and examines their consequences for the relationship between ‘person’ and ‘office’ in the practice of governmental administration. Although, Boltanski and Chiapello have little to say on the topic of public management reform, in itself something of a lacuna in their project, the chapter seeks to make connections, and draw some distinctions, too, with the analysis of the New Spirit of Capitalism that they they proffer. In so doing, the chapter draws attention to the manner in which bureaucratic practices in governmental administration, routinely represented as ‘anachronistic’ by contemporary reformers, can be seen to provide some useful illustrations of the ‘conservation standards’ appropriate to the political management of the state, including the management of ‘change ‘within the state. The chapter suggests that there is not only a suppleness and integrity to the practices of hierarchical bureaucracy that often eludes the gaze of its critics, but also that bureaucracy itself in producing predictability in a state's decisions, actually enhances, indeed, even constitutes, the freedom and flexibility of those operating within the state's field of vision.

    KW - Weber

    KW - Bureaucracy

    KW - Office

    KW - Person

    KW - New Public Management

    KW - State

    KW - Freedom

    U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.003.0012

    DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.003.0012

    M3 - Book chapter

    SN - 9780199595341

    SP - 274

    EP - 293

    BT - New Spirits of Capitalism

    PB - Oxford University Press

    CY - Oxford

    ER -

    du Gay P. New Spirits of Public Management…‘Post-Bureaucracy’. In Gay PD, Morgan G, editors, New Spirits of Capitalism: Crises, Justifications, and Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. p. 274-293. Available from, DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.003.0012