Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity

Diego Stea, Giuseppe Soda, Torben Pedersen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    236 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Network research has yet to determine whether bonding ties or bridging ties are more beneficial for individual creativity, but the debate has mostly overlooked the organizational context in which such ties are formed. In particular, the causal chain connecting network structures and individual outcomes often assumes that different network structures embody specific individual behaviors. This paper challenges the widespread assumption that dense, heavily bonded network structures imply a collaborative attitude on the part of network actors. We propose that collaboration can also be contextual and exogenous to a network’s structural characteristics, such that it moderates the effects of both dense and brokered networks on individual creativity. Specifically, we argue that knowledge acquisition and, in turn, individual creativity are more likely when an individual’s network position has a good fit with the network’s organizational context. Thus, actors in dense network structures acquire more knowledge and eventually become more creative in organizational contexts where collaboration is high. Conversely, brokers who arbitrage information across disconnected network contacts acquire more valuable knowledge, and thereby achieve higher creativity, in organizational contexts where collaboration is low.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
    EditorsJohn Humphreys
    Number of pages5
    Place of PublicationBriar Cliff Manor, NY
    PublisherAcademy of Management
    Publication date2016
    Pages237-241
    Article number11211
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    EventThe Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2016: Making Organizations Meaningful - Anaheim, United States
    Duration: 5 Aug 20169 Aug 2016
    Conference number: 76
    http://aom.org/annualmeeting/

    Conference

    ConferenceThe Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2016
    Number76
    CountryUnited States
    CityAnaheim
    Period05/08/201609/08/2016
    Internet address
    SeriesAcademy of Management Proceedings
    ISSN2151-6561

    Keywords

    • Individual creativity
    • Knowledge sharing
    • Social networks

    Cite this

    Stea, D., Soda, G., & Pedersen, T. (2016). Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity. In J. Humphreys (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (pp. 237-241). [11211] Briar Cliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management. Academy of Management Proceedings https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.153
    Stea, Diego ; Soda, Giuseppe ; Pedersen, Torben. / Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity. Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. editor / John Humphreys. Briar Cliff Manor, NY : Academy of Management, 2016. pp. 237-241 (Academy of Management Proceedings).
    @inproceedings{3741273a801747f7b41797d19b994f97,
    title = "Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity",
    abstract = "Network research has yet to determine whether bonding ties or bridging ties are more beneficial for individual creativity, but the debate has mostly overlooked the organizational context in which such ties are formed. In particular, the causal chain connecting network structures and individual outcomes often assumes that different network structures embody specific individual behaviors. This paper challenges the widespread assumption that dense, heavily bonded network structures imply a collaborative attitude on the part of network actors. We propose that collaboration can also be contextual and exogenous to a network’s structural characteristics, such that it moderates the effects of both dense and brokered networks on individual creativity. Specifically, we argue that knowledge acquisition and, in turn, individual creativity are more likely when an individual’s network position has a good fit with the network’s organizational context. Thus, actors in dense network structures acquire more knowledge and eventually become more creative in organizational contexts where collaboration is high. Conversely, brokers who arbitrage information across disconnected network contacts acquire more valuable knowledge, and thereby achieve higher creativity, in organizational contexts where collaboration is low.",
    keywords = "Individual creativity, Knowledge sharing, Social networks, Individual creativity, Knowledge sharing, Social networks",
    author = "Diego Stea and Giuseppe Soda and Torben Pedersen",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2016.153",
    language = "English",
    series = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
    pages = "237--241",
    editor = "John Humphreys",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management",
    publisher = "Academy of Management",

    }

    Stea, D, Soda, G & Pedersen, T 2016, Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity. in J Humphreys (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management., 11211, Academy of Management, Briar Cliff Manor, NY, Academy of Management Proceedings, pp. 237-241, Anaheim, United States, 05/08/2016. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.153

    Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity. / Stea, Diego; Soda, Giuseppe; Pedersen, Torben.

    Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. ed. / John Humphreys. Briar Cliff Manor, NY : Academy of Management, 2016. p. 237-241 11211 (Academy of Management Proceedings).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity

    AU - Stea, Diego

    AU - Soda, Giuseppe

    AU - Pedersen, Torben

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Network research has yet to determine whether bonding ties or bridging ties are more beneficial for individual creativity, but the debate has mostly overlooked the organizational context in which such ties are formed. In particular, the causal chain connecting network structures and individual outcomes often assumes that different network structures embody specific individual behaviors. This paper challenges the widespread assumption that dense, heavily bonded network structures imply a collaborative attitude on the part of network actors. We propose that collaboration can also be contextual and exogenous to a network’s structural characteristics, such that it moderates the effects of both dense and brokered networks on individual creativity. Specifically, we argue that knowledge acquisition and, in turn, individual creativity are more likely when an individual’s network position has a good fit with the network’s organizational context. Thus, actors in dense network structures acquire more knowledge and eventually become more creative in organizational contexts where collaboration is high. Conversely, brokers who arbitrage information across disconnected network contacts acquire more valuable knowledge, and thereby achieve higher creativity, in organizational contexts where collaboration is low.

    AB - Network research has yet to determine whether bonding ties or bridging ties are more beneficial for individual creativity, but the debate has mostly overlooked the organizational context in which such ties are formed. In particular, the causal chain connecting network structures and individual outcomes often assumes that different network structures embody specific individual behaviors. This paper challenges the widespread assumption that dense, heavily bonded network structures imply a collaborative attitude on the part of network actors. We propose that collaboration can also be contextual and exogenous to a network’s structural characteristics, such that it moderates the effects of both dense and brokered networks on individual creativity. Specifically, we argue that knowledge acquisition and, in turn, individual creativity are more likely when an individual’s network position has a good fit with the network’s organizational context. Thus, actors in dense network structures acquire more knowledge and eventually become more creative in organizational contexts where collaboration is high. Conversely, brokers who arbitrage information across disconnected network contacts acquire more valuable knowledge, and thereby achieve higher creativity, in organizational contexts where collaboration is low.

    KW - Individual creativity

    KW - Knowledge sharing

    KW - Social networks

    KW - Individual creativity

    KW - Knowledge sharing

    KW - Social networks

    U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2016.153

    DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2016.153

    M3 - Article in proceedings

    T3 - Academy of Management Proceedings

    SP - 237

    EP - 241

    BT - Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management

    A2 - Humphreys, John

    PB - Academy of Management

    CY - Briar Cliff Manor, NY

    ER -

    Stea D, Soda G, Pedersen T. Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity. In Humphreys J, editor, Proceedings of the Seventy-sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Briar Cliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management. 2016. p. 237-241. 11211. (Academy of Management Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.153