Negotiating Lean: The Fluidity and Solidity of New Management Technologies in the Danish Public Sector

Esben Rahbek Pedersen, Mahad Muniche

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse how negotiations between the constituencies affect the processes and outcomes of lean projects in Danish public sector organisations.

    Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with managers and employees who have participated in lean projects in the Danish public sector. Negotiated order theory serves as the overarching theoretical framework for the analysis.

    Findings – The paper concludes that the processes and outcomes of lean depend not only on the technology itself, but also the negotiation context in which the planning and implementation of lean projects take place. Lean implementation is not a neutral and value-free activity; it is fluid and open for multiple interpretations, interests, and logics.

    Research limitations/implications – The project is based on qualitative data from lean projects in the Danish public sector. It cannot be concluded that the findings can be generalised to reflect all types of lean projects across organisational and geographical settings.

    Originality/value – The paper adds value to the relatively scarce literature on lean management in the public sector by exploring how negotiative processes influence the planning, implementation, and maintenance/development of lean projects.
    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse how negotiations between the constituencies affect the processes and outcomes of lean projects in Danish public sector organisations.

    Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with managers and employees who have participated in lean projects in the Danish public sector. Negotiated order theory serves as the overarching theoretical framework for the analysis.

    Findings – The paper concludes that the processes and outcomes of lean depend not only on the technology itself, but also the negotiation context in which the planning and implementation of lean projects take place. Lean implementation is not a neutral and value-free activity; it is fluid and open for multiple interpretations, interests, and logics.

    Research limitations/implications – The project is based on qualitative data from lean projects in the Danish public sector. It cannot be concluded that the findings can be generalised to reflect all types of lean projects across organisational and geographical settings.

    Originality/value – The paper adds value to the relatively scarce literature on lean management in the public sector by exploring how negotiative processes influence the planning, implementation, and maintenance/development of lean projects.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
    Volume60
    Issue number6
    Pages550-566
    ISSN1741-0401
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • Lean Management
    • Implementation
    • Public Sector Organizations
    • Negotiated Order
    • Negotiating
    • Communication Management
    • Denmark

    Cite this

    @article{c53c1b8f21d54af4889be7f9d3a6a397,
    title = "Negotiating Lean: The Fluidity and Solidity of New Management Technologies in the Danish Public Sector",
    abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse how negotiations between the constituencies affect the processes and outcomes of lean projects in Danish public sector organisations.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with managers and employees who have participated in lean projects in the Danish public sector. Negotiated order theory serves as the overarching theoretical framework for the analysis.Findings – The paper concludes that the processes and outcomes of lean depend not only on the technology itself, but also the negotiation context in which the planning and implementation of lean projects take place. Lean implementation is not a neutral and value-free activity; it is fluid and open for multiple interpretations, interests, and logics.Research limitations/implications – The project is based on qualitative data from lean projects in the Danish public sector. It cannot be concluded that the findings can be generalised to reflect all types of lean projects across organisational and geographical settings.Originality/value – The paper adds value to the relatively scarce literature on lean management in the public sector by exploring how negotiative processes influence the planning, implementation, and maintenance/development of lean projects.",
    keywords = "Lean Management, Implementation, Public Sector Organizations, Negotiated Order, Negotiating, Communication Management, Denmark",
    author = "{Rahbek Pedersen}, Esben and Mahad Muniche",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1108/17410401111150742",
    language = "English",
    volume = "60",
    pages = "550--566",
    journal = "International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management",
    issn = "1741-0401",
    publisher = "JAI Press",
    number = "6",

    }

    Negotiating Lean : The Fluidity and Solidity of New Management Technologies in the Danish Public Sector. / Rahbek Pedersen, Esben; Muniche, Mahad .

    In: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 60, No. 6, 2011, p. 550-566.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Negotiating Lean

    T2 - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

    AU - Rahbek Pedersen,Esben

    AU - Muniche,Mahad

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse how negotiations between the constituencies affect the processes and outcomes of lean projects in Danish public sector organisations.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with managers and employees who have participated in lean projects in the Danish public sector. Negotiated order theory serves as the overarching theoretical framework for the analysis.Findings – The paper concludes that the processes and outcomes of lean depend not only on the technology itself, but also the negotiation context in which the planning and implementation of lean projects take place. Lean implementation is not a neutral and value-free activity; it is fluid and open for multiple interpretations, interests, and logics.Research limitations/implications – The project is based on qualitative data from lean projects in the Danish public sector. It cannot be concluded that the findings can be generalised to reflect all types of lean projects across organisational and geographical settings.Originality/value – The paper adds value to the relatively scarce literature on lean management in the public sector by exploring how negotiative processes influence the planning, implementation, and maintenance/development of lean projects.

    AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse how negotiations between the constituencies affect the processes and outcomes of lean projects in Danish public sector organisations.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with managers and employees who have participated in lean projects in the Danish public sector. Negotiated order theory serves as the overarching theoretical framework for the analysis.Findings – The paper concludes that the processes and outcomes of lean depend not only on the technology itself, but also the negotiation context in which the planning and implementation of lean projects take place. Lean implementation is not a neutral and value-free activity; it is fluid and open for multiple interpretations, interests, and logics.Research limitations/implications – The project is based on qualitative data from lean projects in the Danish public sector. It cannot be concluded that the findings can be generalised to reflect all types of lean projects across organisational and geographical settings.Originality/value – The paper adds value to the relatively scarce literature on lean management in the public sector by exploring how negotiative processes influence the planning, implementation, and maintenance/development of lean projects.

    KW - Lean Management

    KW - Implementation

    KW - Public Sector Organizations

    KW - Negotiated Order

    KW - Negotiating

    KW - Communication Management

    KW - Denmark

    U2 - 10.1108/17410401111150742

    DO - 10.1108/17410401111150742

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 60

    SP - 550

    EP - 566

    JO - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

    JF - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

    SN - 1741-0401

    IS - 6

    ER -