Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: Institutional Stewards at Work

Mikkel Kruuse*, Kasper Reming Tangbæk, Kristjan Jespersen, Caleb Gallemore

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are a form of private governance sometimes used to manage the social and environmental impacts of supply chains. We argue that there is a potential tension between input and output legitimacy in MSIs. Input legitimacy requires facilitating representation from a wide range of organizations with heterogeneous interests. This work, however, faces collective action problems that could lead to limited ambitions, lowering output legitimacy. We find that, under the right conditions a relatively small group of motivated actors, who we call institutional stewards, may be willing to undertake the cost and labor of building and maintaining the MSI. This can help reconcile the tension between input and output legitimacy in a formal sense, though it also results in inequalities in power. We test this claim using a case study of organizations’ activities in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). We find that a small group of founding members—and other members of long tenure—account for a disproportionate level of activity in the organization.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6621
JournalSustainability
Volume11
Issue number23
Number of pages27
ISSN2071-1050
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Palm oil
  • Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)
  • Institutional work
  • Institutional stewards
  • Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)
  • Legitimacy
  • Sustainability
  • Certification

Cite this

@article{7abff6dddbeb46bb9ba85640d0e33fcb,
title = "Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: Institutional Stewards at Work",
abstract = "Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are a form of private governance sometimes used to manage the social and environmental impacts of supply chains. We argue that there is a potential tension between input and output legitimacy in MSIs. Input legitimacy requires facilitating representation from a wide range of organizations with heterogeneous interests. This work, however, faces collective action problems that could lead to limited ambitions, lowering output legitimacy. We find that, under the right conditions a relatively small group of motivated actors, who we call institutional stewards, may be willing to undertake the cost and labor of building and maintaining the MSI. This can help reconcile the tension between input and output legitimacy in a formal sense, though it also results in inequalities in power. We test this claim using a case study of organizations’ activities in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). We find that a small group of founding members—and other members of long tenure—account for a disproportionate level of activity in the organization.",
keywords = "Palm oil, Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), Institutional work, Institutional stewards, Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), Legitimacy, Sustainability, Certification, Palm oil, Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), Institutional work, Institutional stewards, Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), Legitimacy, Sustainability, Certification",
author = "Mikkel Kruuse and Tangb{\ae}k, {Kasper Reming} and Kristjan Jespersen and Caleb Gallemore",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.3390/su11236621",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "23",

}

Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives : Institutional Stewards at Work. / Kruuse, Mikkel; Tangbæk, Kasper Reming; Jespersen, Kristjan; Gallemore, Caleb.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 23, 6621, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives

T2 - Institutional Stewards at Work

AU - Kruuse, Mikkel

AU - Tangbæk, Kasper Reming

AU - Jespersen, Kristjan

AU - Gallemore, Caleb

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are a form of private governance sometimes used to manage the social and environmental impacts of supply chains. We argue that there is a potential tension between input and output legitimacy in MSIs. Input legitimacy requires facilitating representation from a wide range of organizations with heterogeneous interests. This work, however, faces collective action problems that could lead to limited ambitions, lowering output legitimacy. We find that, under the right conditions a relatively small group of motivated actors, who we call institutional stewards, may be willing to undertake the cost and labor of building and maintaining the MSI. This can help reconcile the tension between input and output legitimacy in a formal sense, though it also results in inequalities in power. We test this claim using a case study of organizations’ activities in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). We find that a small group of founding members—and other members of long tenure—account for a disproportionate level of activity in the organization.

AB - Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are a form of private governance sometimes used to manage the social and environmental impacts of supply chains. We argue that there is a potential tension between input and output legitimacy in MSIs. Input legitimacy requires facilitating representation from a wide range of organizations with heterogeneous interests. This work, however, faces collective action problems that could lead to limited ambitions, lowering output legitimacy. We find that, under the right conditions a relatively small group of motivated actors, who we call institutional stewards, may be willing to undertake the cost and labor of building and maintaining the MSI. This can help reconcile the tension between input and output legitimacy in a formal sense, though it also results in inequalities in power. We test this claim using a case study of organizations’ activities in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). We find that a small group of founding members—and other members of long tenure—account for a disproportionate level of activity in the organization.

KW - Palm oil

KW - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)

KW - Institutional work

KW - Institutional stewards

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Sustainability

KW - Certification

KW - Palm oil

KW - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)

KW - Institutional work

KW - Institutional stewards

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Sustainability

KW - Certification

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000717919&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.3390/su11236621

DO - 10.3390/su11236621

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 23

M1 - 6621

ER -