Abstract
We distinguish learning from infrequent failures from learning from frequent successes, and identify four pathways for organizational learning from failures: (1) internal analysis of an organization’s own accidents; (2) imitation of other organizations’ responses to their accidents; (3) adoption of recommendations resulting from analyses by third-party agencies of specific accident’s causes; and (4) regulatory interventions resulting from analyses by third-party agencies of system-wide accident patterns. Using data from the US freight railroad industry between 1975 and 2001 we find that railroads learn more from others’ accidents than from their own, from third-party recommendations than analyses, and that learning from others is mediated by third-party recommendations and regulatory interventions. We conclude that third-party repositories of experience are key enablers of learning from failure. Simply put, failures are too important to leave for organizations to learn from on their own.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Everybody Fails But Not Everybody Learns : Why Is it so Hard to Learn From Failures? |
| Editors | Kristina Dahlin, You-Ta Chuang |
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Publication date | 2025 |
| Pages | 176-207 |
| Chapter | 10 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198888642 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191995170 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- Failure learning
- Regulation
- Vicarious learning
- Freight rail
- Train accidents
- Third parties