Multistakeholder Initiatives in Global Production Networks

Naturalizing Specific Understandings of Sustainability Through the Better Cotton Initiative

Lone Riisgaard, Peter Lund-Thomsen, Neil M. Coe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In recent years, various academics, consultants, companies and NGOs have advocated a move towards more cooperative approaches to private sustainability standards to address the widely identified shortcomings of the compliance paradigm. However, is it possible to address these limitations by moving towards stakeholder inclusion and capacity building while at the same time catering to the demands of lead firms supplying the mainstream market? In this article, we analyse how the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) seeks to do just that, in the process identifying three key tensions and competing policy concerns with which standard‐setters have had to grapple – (a) stakeholder inclusion vs process‐control/efficiency; (b) stringency of the standard vs scale of production; and (c) capacity building vs auditing. Combining theoretical considerations about governance in global production networks (GPNs) with a convention theory perspective, we explore these inherent tensions and show that due to pre‐existing power relations in the cotton GPN, it is hard to develop more cooperative approaches because market and industrial values tend to win out despite efforts to follow current best practice on sustainability standard‐setting.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobal Networks
Number of pages26
ISSN1470-2266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2019

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 18. June 2019

Keywords

  • Convention theory
  • Cotton
  • Global production networks
  • Governance
  • Multi-stakeholder initiatives
  • Standards

Cite this

@article{3a76cb6cddbe4641bca99f1a45ad7cc6,
title = "Multistakeholder Initiatives in Global Production Networks: Naturalizing Specific Understandings of Sustainability Through the Better Cotton Initiative",
abstract = "In recent years, various academics, consultants, companies and NGOs have advocated a move towards more cooperative approaches to private sustainability standards to address the widely identified shortcomings of the compliance paradigm. However, is it possible to address these limitations by moving towards stakeholder inclusion and capacity building while at the same time catering to the demands of lead firms supplying the mainstream market? In this article, we analyse how the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) seeks to do just that, in the process identifying three key tensions and competing policy concerns with which standard‐setters have had to grapple – (a) stakeholder inclusion vs process‐control/efficiency; (b) stringency of the standard vs scale of production; and (c) capacity building vs auditing. Combining theoretical considerations about governance in global production networks (GPNs) with a convention theory perspective, we explore these inherent tensions and show that due to pre‐existing power relations in the cotton GPN, it is hard to develop more cooperative approaches because market and industrial values tend to win out despite efforts to follow current best practice on sustainability standard‐setting.",
keywords = "Convention theory, Cotton, Global production networks, Governance, Multi-stakeholder initiatives, Standards, Convention theory, Cotton, Global production networks, Governance, Multi-stakeholder initiatives, Standards",
author = "Lone Riisgaard and Peter Lund-Thomsen and Coe, {Neil M.}",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 18. June 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1111/glob.12251",
language = "English",
journal = "Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs",
issn = "1470-2266",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing",

}

Multistakeholder Initiatives in Global Production Networks : Naturalizing Specific Understandings of Sustainability Through the Better Cotton Initiative. / Riisgaard, Lone; Lund-Thomsen, Peter; Coe, Neil M.

In: Global Networks, 18.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multistakeholder Initiatives in Global Production Networks

T2 - Naturalizing Specific Understandings of Sustainability Through the Better Cotton Initiative

AU - Riisgaard, Lone

AU - Lund-Thomsen, Peter

AU - Coe, Neil M.

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 18. June 2019

PY - 2019/6/18

Y1 - 2019/6/18

N2 - In recent years, various academics, consultants, companies and NGOs have advocated a move towards more cooperative approaches to private sustainability standards to address the widely identified shortcomings of the compliance paradigm. However, is it possible to address these limitations by moving towards stakeholder inclusion and capacity building while at the same time catering to the demands of lead firms supplying the mainstream market? In this article, we analyse how the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) seeks to do just that, in the process identifying three key tensions and competing policy concerns with which standard‐setters have had to grapple – (a) stakeholder inclusion vs process‐control/efficiency; (b) stringency of the standard vs scale of production; and (c) capacity building vs auditing. Combining theoretical considerations about governance in global production networks (GPNs) with a convention theory perspective, we explore these inherent tensions and show that due to pre‐existing power relations in the cotton GPN, it is hard to develop more cooperative approaches because market and industrial values tend to win out despite efforts to follow current best practice on sustainability standard‐setting.

AB - In recent years, various academics, consultants, companies and NGOs have advocated a move towards more cooperative approaches to private sustainability standards to address the widely identified shortcomings of the compliance paradigm. However, is it possible to address these limitations by moving towards stakeholder inclusion and capacity building while at the same time catering to the demands of lead firms supplying the mainstream market? In this article, we analyse how the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) seeks to do just that, in the process identifying three key tensions and competing policy concerns with which standard‐setters have had to grapple – (a) stakeholder inclusion vs process‐control/efficiency; (b) stringency of the standard vs scale of production; and (c) capacity building vs auditing. Combining theoretical considerations about governance in global production networks (GPNs) with a convention theory perspective, we explore these inherent tensions and show that due to pre‐existing power relations in the cotton GPN, it is hard to develop more cooperative approaches because market and industrial values tend to win out despite efforts to follow current best practice on sustainability standard‐setting.

KW - Convention theory

KW - Cotton

KW - Global production networks

KW - Governance

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives

KW - Standards

KW - Convention theory

KW - Cotton

KW - Global production networks

KW - Governance

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives

KW - Standards

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110980865608954&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/glob.12251

DO - 10.1111/glob.12251

M3 - Journal article

JO - Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs

JF - Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs

SN - 1470-2266

ER -