(Mis)taking Social Responsibility? Implementing Welfare State Reform by Private and Non-profit Organizations

Nicolette Van Gestel*, Susanne Boch Waldorff, Jean Louis Denis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article relates institutional theory to the concept of organizational legitimacy with cognitive, moral, and pragmatic dimensions, to analyse how a Dutch national policy reform – aimed at expanding the social responsibility for sick leave and disability toward non-state organizations – is understood and enacted locally. Based on interviews in 52 organizations, the study highlights that implementing welfare state reform is predominantly based on pragmatic reasoning, and justified by specific moral and cognitive interpretations. The findings reveal that implementing reform is active institutional work by – paradoxically – restricted local agency, with disciplinary effects on a narrow range of actors.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Management Review
Number of pages21
ISSN1471-9037
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2019

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 8. August 2019

Keywords

  • Welfare state reform
  • Institutional theory
  • Organizational legitimacy
  • Social responsibility
  • Sick leave policy

Cite this

@article{8bbe95fbab0b4f4baf98cc00e744c9e6,
title = "(Mis)taking Social Responsibility?: Implementing Welfare State Reform by Private and Non-profit Organizations",
abstract = "This article relates institutional theory to the concept of organizational legitimacy with cognitive, moral, and pragmatic dimensions, to analyse how a Dutch national policy reform – aimed at expanding the social responsibility for sick leave and disability toward non-state organizations – is understood and enacted locally. Based on interviews in 52 organizations, the study highlights that implementing welfare state reform is predominantly based on pragmatic reasoning, and justified by specific moral and cognitive interpretations. The findings reveal that implementing reform is active institutional work by – paradoxically – restricted local agency, with disciplinary effects on a narrow range of actors.",
keywords = "Welfare state reform, Institutional theory, Organizational legitimacy, Social responsibility, Sick leave policy, Welfare state reform, Institutional theory, Organizational legitimacy, Social responsibility, Sick leave policy",
author = "Gestel, {Nicolette Van} and Waldorff, {Susanne Boch} and Denis, {Jean Louis}",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 8. August 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/14719037.2019.1648696",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Management Review (Print)",
issn = "1471-9037",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",

}

(Mis)taking Social Responsibility? Implementing Welfare State Reform by Private and Non-profit Organizations. / Gestel, Nicolette Van; Waldorff, Susanne Boch; Denis, Jean Louis.

In: Public Management Review , 08.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Mis)taking Social Responsibility?

T2 - Implementing Welfare State Reform by Private and Non-profit Organizations

AU - Gestel, Nicolette Van

AU - Waldorff, Susanne Boch

AU - Denis, Jean Louis

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 8. August 2019

PY - 2019/8/8

Y1 - 2019/8/8

N2 - This article relates institutional theory to the concept of organizational legitimacy with cognitive, moral, and pragmatic dimensions, to analyse how a Dutch national policy reform – aimed at expanding the social responsibility for sick leave and disability toward non-state organizations – is understood and enacted locally. Based on interviews in 52 organizations, the study highlights that implementing welfare state reform is predominantly based on pragmatic reasoning, and justified by specific moral and cognitive interpretations. The findings reveal that implementing reform is active institutional work by – paradoxically – restricted local agency, with disciplinary effects on a narrow range of actors.

AB - This article relates institutional theory to the concept of organizational legitimacy with cognitive, moral, and pragmatic dimensions, to analyse how a Dutch national policy reform – aimed at expanding the social responsibility for sick leave and disability toward non-state organizations – is understood and enacted locally. Based on interviews in 52 organizations, the study highlights that implementing welfare state reform is predominantly based on pragmatic reasoning, and justified by specific moral and cognitive interpretations. The findings reveal that implementing reform is active institutional work by – paradoxically – restricted local agency, with disciplinary effects on a narrow range of actors.

KW - Welfare state reform

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Organizational legitimacy

KW - Social responsibility

KW - Sick leave policy

KW - Welfare state reform

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Organizational legitimacy

KW - Social responsibility

KW - Sick leave policy

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110980863779921&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2019.1648696

DO - 10.1080/14719037.2019.1648696

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85070806273

JO - Public Management Review (Print)

JF - Public Management Review (Print)

SN - 1471-9037

ER -