Measuring Systemic Risk

Viral V. Acharya, Lasse Heje Pedersen, Thomas Philippon, Matthew Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We present an economic model of systemic risk in which undercapitalization of the financial sector as a whole is assumed to harm the real economy, leading to a systemic risk externality. Each financial institution’s contribution to systemic risk can be measured as its systemic expected shortfall (SES), that is, its propensity to be undercapitalized when the system as a whole is undercapitalized. SES increases in the institution’s leverage and its marginal expected shortfall (MES), that is, its losses in the tail of the system’s loss distribution. We demonstrate empirically the ability of components of SES to predict emerging systemic risk during the financial crisis of 2007–2009.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Review of Financial Studies
Volume30
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)2-47
ISSN0893-9454
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

Acharya, V. V., Heje Pedersen, L., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2017). Measuring Systemic Risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 2-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw088
Acharya, Viral V. ; Heje Pedersen, Lasse ; Philippon, Thomas ; Richardson, Matthew. / Measuring Systemic Risk. In: The Review of Financial Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 2-47.
@article{f2c3fb5b86ff42bdb487699b84c8ba97,
title = "Measuring Systemic Risk",
abstract = "We present an economic model of systemic risk in which undercapitalization of the financial sector as a whole is assumed to harm the real economy, leading to a systemic risk externality. Each financial institution’s contribution to systemic risk can be measured as its systemic expected shortfall (SES), that is, its propensity to be undercapitalized when the system as a whole is undercapitalized. SES increases in the institution’s leverage and its marginal expected shortfall (MES), that is, its losses in the tail of the system’s loss distribution. We demonstrate empirically the ability of components of SES to predict emerging systemic risk during the financial crisis of 2007–2009.",
author = "Acharya, {Viral V.} and {Heje Pedersen}, Lasse and Thomas Philippon and Matthew Richardson",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1093/rfs/hhw088",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "2--47",
journal = "Review of Financial Studies",
issn = "0893-9454",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Acharya, VV, Heje Pedersen, L, Philippon, T & Richardson, M 2017, 'Measuring Systemic Risk', The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 2-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw088

Measuring Systemic Risk. / Acharya, Viral V.; Heje Pedersen, Lasse; Philippon, Thomas; Richardson, Matthew.

In: The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2017, p. 2-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Systemic Risk

AU - Acharya, Viral V.

AU - Heje Pedersen, Lasse

AU - Philippon, Thomas

AU - Richardson, Matthew

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We present an economic model of systemic risk in which undercapitalization of the financial sector as a whole is assumed to harm the real economy, leading to a systemic risk externality. Each financial institution’s contribution to systemic risk can be measured as its systemic expected shortfall (SES), that is, its propensity to be undercapitalized when the system as a whole is undercapitalized. SES increases in the institution’s leverage and its marginal expected shortfall (MES), that is, its losses in the tail of the system’s loss distribution. We demonstrate empirically the ability of components of SES to predict emerging systemic risk during the financial crisis of 2007–2009.

AB - We present an economic model of systemic risk in which undercapitalization of the financial sector as a whole is assumed to harm the real economy, leading to a systemic risk externality. Each financial institution’s contribution to systemic risk can be measured as its systemic expected shortfall (SES), that is, its propensity to be undercapitalized when the system as a whole is undercapitalized. SES increases in the institution’s leverage and its marginal expected shortfall (MES), that is, its losses in the tail of the system’s loss distribution. We demonstrate empirically the ability of components of SES to predict emerging systemic risk during the financial crisis of 2007–2009.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925558503&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1093/rfs/hhw088

DO - 10.1093/rfs/hhw088

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 2

EP - 47

JO - Review of Financial Studies

JF - Review of Financial Studies

SN - 0893-9454

IS - 1

ER -