Measures of Strategic Alliance Performance, Classified and Assessed

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Over the last three decades, strategic alliance performance has been an important research topic within the international business and management fields. Researchers have investigated a number of factors explaining performance but often find diverging results. Scholars have suggested that one reason may be that different performance measures are used as the dependent variable. But which differences exist and how can they matter? Against this backdrop, the present study makes three main contributions. First, we identify dimensions that illustrate differences and similarities between performance measures and provide a simple yet comprehensive classification of the different performance measures used in 167 empirical studies in the literature. Second, we suggest how differences in performance measures may influence construct validity under different circumstances. Third, we show that the differences have empirical implications for the results researchers get when using the measures. The study implications serve to improve researchers’ ability to choose performance measures that are appropriate in a given situation and to help them assess the influence the choice of performance measure may have on tests of hypotheses regarding antecedents’ influence on performance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Business Review
Volume23
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)479-489
Number of pages11
ISSN0969-5931
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Classification
  • Construct Validity
  • Joint Venture
  • Measurement
  • Performance
  • Strategic Alliance

Cite this

@article{e95697efc567478d893ab147697bc2c8,
title = "Measures of Strategic Alliance Performance, Classified and Assessed",
abstract = "Over the last three decades, strategic alliance performance has been an important research topic within the international business and management fields. Researchers have investigated a number of factors explaining performance but often find diverging results. Scholars have suggested that one reason may be that different performance measures are used as the dependent variable. But which differences exist and how can they matter? Against this backdrop, the present study makes three main contributions. First, we identify dimensions that illustrate differences and similarities between performance measures and provide a simple yet comprehensive classification of the different performance measures used in 167 empirical studies in the literature. Second, we suggest how differences in performance measures may influence construct validity under different circumstances. Third, we show that the differences have empirical implications for the results researchers get when using the measures. The study implications serve to improve researchers’ ability to choose performance measures that are appropriate in a given situation and to help them assess the influence the choice of performance measure may have on tests of hypotheses regarding antecedents’ influence on performance.",
keywords = "Classification, Construct Validity, Joint Venture, Measurement , Performance, Strategic Alliance, Classification, Construct validity, Joint venture, Measurement, Performance, Strategic alliance",
author = "Jeppe Christoffersen and Thomas Plenborg and Robson, {Matthew J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "479--489",
journal = "International Business Review",
issn = "0969-5931",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "3",

}

Measures of Strategic Alliance Performance, Classified and Assessed. / Christoffersen, Jeppe; Plenborg, Thomas; Robson, Matthew J.

In: International Business Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 06.2014, p. 479-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measures of Strategic Alliance Performance, Classified and Assessed

AU - Christoffersen, Jeppe

AU - Plenborg, Thomas

AU - Robson, Matthew J.

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Over the last three decades, strategic alliance performance has been an important research topic within the international business and management fields. Researchers have investigated a number of factors explaining performance but often find diverging results. Scholars have suggested that one reason may be that different performance measures are used as the dependent variable. But which differences exist and how can they matter? Against this backdrop, the present study makes three main contributions. First, we identify dimensions that illustrate differences and similarities between performance measures and provide a simple yet comprehensive classification of the different performance measures used in 167 empirical studies in the literature. Second, we suggest how differences in performance measures may influence construct validity under different circumstances. Third, we show that the differences have empirical implications for the results researchers get when using the measures. The study implications serve to improve researchers’ ability to choose performance measures that are appropriate in a given situation and to help them assess the influence the choice of performance measure may have on tests of hypotheses regarding antecedents’ influence on performance.

AB - Over the last three decades, strategic alliance performance has been an important research topic within the international business and management fields. Researchers have investigated a number of factors explaining performance but often find diverging results. Scholars have suggested that one reason may be that different performance measures are used as the dependent variable. But which differences exist and how can they matter? Against this backdrop, the present study makes three main contributions. First, we identify dimensions that illustrate differences and similarities between performance measures and provide a simple yet comprehensive classification of the different performance measures used in 167 empirical studies in the literature. Second, we suggest how differences in performance measures may influence construct validity under different circumstances. Third, we show that the differences have empirical implications for the results researchers get when using the measures. The study implications serve to improve researchers’ ability to choose performance measures that are appropriate in a given situation and to help them assess the influence the choice of performance measure may have on tests of hypotheses regarding antecedents’ influence on performance.

KW - Classification

KW - Construct Validity

KW - Joint Venture

KW - Measurement

KW - Performance

KW - Strategic Alliance

KW - Classification

KW - Construct validity

KW - Joint venture

KW - Measurement

KW - Performance

KW - Strategic alliance

U2 - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.07.001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 479

EP - 489

JO - International Business Review

JF - International Business Review

SN - 0969-5931

IS - 3

ER -