Managing Paradoxical Tensions During the Implementation of Lean Capabilities for Improvement

Malek Miguel Maalouf, Britta Gammelgaard

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

448 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: – Through the identification and investigation of the organisational paradoxes in lean, the purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of lean implementation intricacies, and contribute to sustaining lean in companies.
Design/methodology/approach: – Case study based on semi-structured interviews with participants in lean conversion from three companies in Denmark. The companies come from different business sectors: public transport, healthcare and finance.
Findings: – This study identifies three types of organisational paradoxes in lean: organising, performing and belonging. The study also points to a range managerial responses used for dealing with the three paradoxes and facilitating lean transformation.
Research limitations/implications: – This is a theory development paper which increases the understanding regarding the role of the organisational paradoxes in facilitating or hindering lean transformation.
Practical implications: – The study generates insights which help managers identify and deal with the individual motivations for opposing lean practices, and thus facilitates lean transformation.
Originality/value: – This study adds clarity to the process of managing lean implementation by identifying three different motivations for people to oppose lean transformation. The study also recommends managerial actions for dealing with each situation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Operations and Production Management
Volume36
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)687-709
ISSN0144-3577
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Denmark
  • Lean
  • Continuous improvement
  • Tension
  • Paradox
  • Organizational paradox

Cite this

@article{2bd0c479f3b04ca8a7486bc771ccab94,
title = "Managing Paradoxical Tensions During the Implementation of Lean Capabilities for Improvement",
abstract = "Purpose: – Through the identification and investigation of the organisational paradoxes in lean, the purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of lean implementation intricacies, and contribute to sustaining lean in companies.Design/methodology/approach: – Case study based on semi-structured interviews with participants in lean conversion from three companies in Denmark. The companies come from different business sectors: public transport, healthcare and finance.Findings: – This study identifies three types of organisational paradoxes in lean: organising, performing and belonging. The study also points to a range managerial responses used for dealing with the three paradoxes and facilitating lean transformation.Research limitations/implications: – This is a theory development paper which increases the understanding regarding the role of the organisational paradoxes in facilitating or hindering lean transformation.Practical implications: – The study generates insights which help managers identify and deal with the individual motivations for opposing lean practices, and thus facilitates lean transformation.Originality/value: – This study adds clarity to the process of managing lean implementation by identifying three different motivations for people to oppose lean transformation. The study also recommends managerial actions for dealing with each situation.",
keywords = "Denmark, Lean, Continuous improvement, Tension, Paradox, Organizational paradox, Denmark, Lean, Continuous improvement, Tension, Paradox, Organizational paradox",
author = "Maalouf, {Malek Miguel} and Britta Gammelgaard",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/IJOPM-10-2014-0471",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "687--709",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "6",

}

Managing Paradoxical Tensions During the Implementation of Lean Capabilities for Improvement. / Maalouf, Malek Miguel; Gammelgaard, Britta.

In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2016, p. 687-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing Paradoxical Tensions During the Implementation of Lean Capabilities for Improvement

AU - Maalouf, Malek Miguel

AU - Gammelgaard, Britta

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: – Through the identification and investigation of the organisational paradoxes in lean, the purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of lean implementation intricacies, and contribute to sustaining lean in companies.Design/methodology/approach: – Case study based on semi-structured interviews with participants in lean conversion from three companies in Denmark. The companies come from different business sectors: public transport, healthcare and finance.Findings: – This study identifies three types of organisational paradoxes in lean: organising, performing and belonging. The study also points to a range managerial responses used for dealing with the three paradoxes and facilitating lean transformation.Research limitations/implications: – This is a theory development paper which increases the understanding regarding the role of the organisational paradoxes in facilitating or hindering lean transformation.Practical implications: – The study generates insights which help managers identify and deal with the individual motivations for opposing lean practices, and thus facilitates lean transformation.Originality/value: – This study adds clarity to the process of managing lean implementation by identifying three different motivations for people to oppose lean transformation. The study also recommends managerial actions for dealing with each situation.

AB - Purpose: – Through the identification and investigation of the organisational paradoxes in lean, the purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of lean implementation intricacies, and contribute to sustaining lean in companies.Design/methodology/approach: – Case study based on semi-structured interviews with participants in lean conversion from three companies in Denmark. The companies come from different business sectors: public transport, healthcare and finance.Findings: – This study identifies three types of organisational paradoxes in lean: organising, performing and belonging. The study also points to a range managerial responses used for dealing with the three paradoxes and facilitating lean transformation.Research limitations/implications: – This is a theory development paper which increases the understanding regarding the role of the organisational paradoxes in facilitating or hindering lean transformation.Practical implications: – The study generates insights which help managers identify and deal with the individual motivations for opposing lean practices, and thus facilitates lean transformation.Originality/value: – This study adds clarity to the process of managing lean implementation by identifying three different motivations for people to oppose lean transformation. The study also recommends managerial actions for dealing with each situation.

KW - Denmark

KW - Lean

KW - Continuous improvement

KW - Tension

KW - Paradox

KW - Organizational paradox

KW - Denmark

KW - Lean

KW - Continuous improvement

KW - Tension

KW - Paradox

KW - Organizational paradox

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921370616

U2 - 10.1108/IJOPM-10-2014-0471

DO - 10.1108/IJOPM-10-2014-0471

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 687

EP - 709

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 6

ER -