Managing Multiple Forms of Employment in the Construction Sector: Implications for HRM

Jawwad Raja, Stuart D. Green, Roine Leiringer, Andrew Dainty, Stewart Johnstone

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the largest and most complex industrial sectors in the UK. The industry's failure to adopt progressive human resource (HR) practices is routinely blamed on the challenges of operating in a fragmented, project-based environment reliant on subcontracting. This research examines the extent to which existing HR theory accounts for the particular employment context of project-based organisations operating in volatile markets. Drawing upon case study research from two different divisions within a large contracting firm, this article explores the extent to which different contracting arrangements impinge on attempts to reposition human resource management (HRM) as a strategic function along the business partnering model. Elevating the role of the HR function is found to be difficult to reconcile with the concurrent demands of managing multiple forms of employment arrangements. The research reveals a need for HRM models that account for the specificities of complex, differentiated organisations that operate in multiple environments.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Resource Management Journal
Volume23
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)313-328
ISSN0954-5395
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

Raja, Jawwad ; D. Green, Stuart ; Leiringer, Roine ; Dainty, Andrew ; Johnstone, Stewart. / Managing Multiple Forms of Employment in the Construction Sector : Implications for HRM. In: Human Resource Management Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 313-328.
@article{e262e04ee2174480b1b8ad9df41da0ab,
title = "Managing Multiple Forms of Employment in the Construction Sector: Implications for HRM",
abstract = "The construction industry is one of the largest and most complex industrial sectors in the UK. The industry's failure to adopt progressive human resource (HR) practices is routinely blamed on the challenges of operating in a fragmented, project-based environment reliant on subcontracting. This research examines the extent to which existing HR theory accounts for the particular employment context of project-based organisations operating in volatile markets. Drawing upon case study research from two different divisions within a large contracting firm, this article explores the extent to which different contracting arrangements impinge on attempts to reposition human resource management (HRM) as a strategic function along the business partnering model. Elevating the role of the HR function is found to be difficult to reconcile with the concurrent demands of managing multiple forms of employment arrangements. The research reveals a need for HRM models that account for the specificities of complex, differentiated organisations that operate in multiple environments.",
author = "Jawwad Raja and {D. Green}, Stuart and Roine Leiringer and Andrew Dainty and Stewart Johnstone",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00202.x",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "313--328",
journal = "Human Resource Management Journal",
issn = "0954-5395",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "3",

}

Managing Multiple Forms of Employment in the Construction Sector : Implications for HRM. / Raja, Jawwad; D. Green, Stuart; Leiringer, Roine ; Dainty, Andrew; Johnstone, Stewart.

In: Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2013, p. 313-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing Multiple Forms of Employment in the Construction Sector

T2 - Implications for HRM

AU - Raja, Jawwad

AU - D. Green, Stuart

AU - Leiringer, Roine

AU - Dainty, Andrew

AU - Johnstone, Stewart

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The construction industry is one of the largest and most complex industrial sectors in the UK. The industry's failure to adopt progressive human resource (HR) practices is routinely blamed on the challenges of operating in a fragmented, project-based environment reliant on subcontracting. This research examines the extent to which existing HR theory accounts for the particular employment context of project-based organisations operating in volatile markets. Drawing upon case study research from two different divisions within a large contracting firm, this article explores the extent to which different contracting arrangements impinge on attempts to reposition human resource management (HRM) as a strategic function along the business partnering model. Elevating the role of the HR function is found to be difficult to reconcile with the concurrent demands of managing multiple forms of employment arrangements. The research reveals a need for HRM models that account for the specificities of complex, differentiated organisations that operate in multiple environments.

AB - The construction industry is one of the largest and most complex industrial sectors in the UK. The industry's failure to adopt progressive human resource (HR) practices is routinely blamed on the challenges of operating in a fragmented, project-based environment reliant on subcontracting. This research examines the extent to which existing HR theory accounts for the particular employment context of project-based organisations operating in volatile markets. Drawing upon case study research from two different divisions within a large contracting firm, this article explores the extent to which different contracting arrangements impinge on attempts to reposition human resource management (HRM) as a strategic function along the business partnering model. Elevating the role of the HR function is found to be difficult to reconcile with the concurrent demands of managing multiple forms of employment arrangements. The research reveals a need for HRM models that account for the specificities of complex, differentiated organisations that operate in multiple environments.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00202.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00202.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 313

EP - 328

JO - Human Resource Management Journal

JF - Human Resource Management Journal

SN - 0954-5395

IS - 3

ER -