Looking for Salience: Eye-tracking and Preference Reversals

Andreas Gotfredsen; Edward J. D. Webb; Carsten S. Nielsen; Alexander C. Sebald

Looking for Salience: Eye-tracking and Preference Reversals

Andreas Gotfredsen, Edward J. D. Webb, Carsten S. Nielsen, Alexander C. Sebald

University of Copenhagen

Research output: Working paper › Research

Abstract

The results of an eye-tracking experiment designed to study a violation of revealed preference predicted by salience theory are reported. Specifically, individuals will choose a low quality good with a low price level and a high quality good with a high price level, despite the price of the quality premium being held constant. Subjects exhibited a significant numbers of such preference reversals (16.12% of decisions). However, the eye-tracking hypotheses, designed to test the underlying mechanism of salience theory, are all rejected. The implications for salience theory are discussed. More reversals were observed with hypothetical than incentivized choice (22.11% vs. 10.12% of decisions).

Original language	English
Place of Publication	Copenhagen
Publisher	Department of Economics. University of Copenhagen
Number of pages	33
Publication status	Published - 2015
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Published in: Webb, Edward John Dorrell (2016) : Attention and perception in decisionmaking and interactions, PhD Series, No. 181, ISBN 978-87-93428-04-1, University of Copenhagen, Department of Economics, Copenhagen.

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@techreport{0ab77350377242cab92d0a2d8de3bae7,

title = "Looking for Salience: Eye-tracking and Preference Reversals",

abstract = "The results of an eye-tracking experiment designed to study a violation of revealed preference predicted by salience theory are reported. Specifically, individuals will choose a low quality good with a low price level and a high quality good with a high price level, despite the price of the quality premium being held constant. Subjects exhibited a significant numbers of such preference reversals (16.12% of decisions). However, the eye-tracking hypotheses, designed to test the underlying mechanism of salience theory, are all rejected. The implications for salience theory are discussed. More reversals were observed with hypothetical than incentivized choice (22.11% vs. 10.12% of decisions).",

author = "Andreas Gotfredsen and Webb, {Edward J. D.} and Nielsen, {Carsten S.} and Sebald, {Alexander C.}",

note = "Published in: Webb, Edward John Dorrell (2016) : Attention and perception in decisionmaking and interactions, PhD Series, No. 181, ISBN 978-87-93428-04-1, University of Copenhagen, Department of Economics, Copenhagen.",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

publisher = "Department of Economics. University of Copenhagen",

address = "Denmark",

type = "WorkingPaper",

institution = "Department of Economics. University of Copenhagen",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Looking for Salience

T2 - Eye-tracking and Preference Reversals

AU - Gotfredsen, Andreas

AU - Webb, Edward J. D.

AU - Nielsen, Carsten S.

AU - Sebald, Alexander C.

N1 - Published in: Webb, Edward John Dorrell (2016) : Attention and perception in decisionmaking and interactions, PhD Series, No. 181, ISBN 978-87-93428-04-1, University of Copenhagen, Department of Economics, Copenhagen.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The results of an eye-tracking experiment designed to study a violation of revealed preference predicted by salience theory are reported. Specifically, individuals will choose a low quality good with a low price level and a high quality good with a high price level, despite the price of the quality premium being held constant. Subjects exhibited a significant numbers of such preference reversals (16.12% of decisions). However, the eye-tracking hypotheses, designed to test the underlying mechanism of salience theory, are all rejected. The implications for salience theory are discussed. More reversals were observed with hypothetical than incentivized choice (22.11% vs. 10.12% of decisions).

AB - The results of an eye-tracking experiment designed to study a violation of revealed preference predicted by salience theory are reported. Specifically, individuals will choose a low quality good with a low price level and a high quality good with a high price level, despite the price of the quality premium being held constant. Subjects exhibited a significant numbers of such preference reversals (16.12% of decisions). However, the eye-tracking hypotheses, designed to test the underlying mechanism of salience theory, are all rejected. The implications for salience theory are discussed. More reversals were observed with hypothetical than incentivized choice (22.11% vs. 10.12% of decisions).

M3 - Working paper

BT - Looking for Salience

PB - Department of Economics. University of Copenhagen

CY - Copenhagen

ER -