Location and Collocation Advantages in International Innovation

Rajneesh Narula, Grazia D. Santangelo

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper examines the role of location‐specific (L) advantages in the spatial distribution of multinational enterprise (MNE) R&D activity. The meaning of L advantages is revisited. In addition to L advantages that are industry‐specific, the paper emphasises that there is an important category of L advantages, referred to as collocation advantages.Design/methodology/approach: Using the OLI framework, this paper highlights that the innovation activities of MNEs are about interaction of these variables, and the essential process of internalising L advantages to enhance and create firm‐specific advantages.Findings: Collocation advantages derive from spatial proximity to specific unaffiliated firms, which may be suppliers, competitors, or customers. It is also argued that L advantages are not always public goods, because they may not be available to all firms at a similar or marginal cost. These costs are associated with access and internalisation of L advantages, and – especially in the case of R&D – are attendant with the complexities of embeddedness.Originality/value: The centralisation/decentralisation, spatial separation/collocation debates in R&D location have been mistakenly viewed as a paradox facing firms, instead of as a trade‐off that firms must make.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMultinational Business Review
Volume20
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)6-25
Number of pages20
ISSN1525-383X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Foreign direct investment
  • Multinational enterprises
  • Eclectic paradigm
  • Collocation
  • Country-specific advantages
  • Innovation
  • International business

Cite this

@article{5a6d29b0b68d433699335bfcd80dd862,
title = "Location and Collocation Advantages in International Innovation",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper examines the role of location‐specific (L) advantages in the spatial distribution of multinational enterprise (MNE) R&D activity. The meaning of L advantages is revisited. In addition to L advantages that are industry‐specific, the paper emphasises that there is an important category of L advantages, referred to as collocation advantages.Design/methodology/approach: Using the OLI framework, this paper highlights that the innovation activities of MNEs are about interaction of these variables, and the essential process of internalising L advantages to enhance and create firm‐specific advantages.Findings: Collocation advantages derive from spatial proximity to specific unaffiliated firms, which may be suppliers, competitors, or customers. It is also argued that L advantages are not always public goods, because they may not be available to all firms at a similar or marginal cost. These costs are associated with access and internalisation of L advantages, and – especially in the case of R&D – are attendant with the complexities of embeddedness.Originality/value: The centralisation/decentralisation, spatial separation/collocation debates in R&D location have been mistakenly viewed as a paradox facing firms, instead of as a trade‐off that firms must make.",
keywords = "Foreign direct investment, Multinational enterprises, Eclectic paradigm, Collocation, Country-specific advantages, Innovation, International business, Foreign direct investment, Multinational enterprises, Eclectic paradigm, Collocation, Country-specific advantages, Innovation, International business",
author = "Rajneesh Narula and Santangelo, {Grazia D.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/15253831211217161",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "6--25",
journal = "Multinational Business Review",
issn = "1525-383X",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "1",

}

Location and Collocation Advantages in International Innovation. / Narula, Rajneesh; Santangelo, Grazia D.

In: Multinational Business Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2012, p. 6-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Location and Collocation Advantages in International Innovation

AU - Narula, Rajneesh

AU - Santangelo, Grazia D.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: This paper examines the role of location‐specific (L) advantages in the spatial distribution of multinational enterprise (MNE) R&D activity. The meaning of L advantages is revisited. In addition to L advantages that are industry‐specific, the paper emphasises that there is an important category of L advantages, referred to as collocation advantages.Design/methodology/approach: Using the OLI framework, this paper highlights that the innovation activities of MNEs are about interaction of these variables, and the essential process of internalising L advantages to enhance and create firm‐specific advantages.Findings: Collocation advantages derive from spatial proximity to specific unaffiliated firms, which may be suppliers, competitors, or customers. It is also argued that L advantages are not always public goods, because they may not be available to all firms at a similar or marginal cost. These costs are associated with access and internalisation of L advantages, and – especially in the case of R&D – are attendant with the complexities of embeddedness.Originality/value: The centralisation/decentralisation, spatial separation/collocation debates in R&D location have been mistakenly viewed as a paradox facing firms, instead of as a trade‐off that firms must make.

AB - Purpose: This paper examines the role of location‐specific (L) advantages in the spatial distribution of multinational enterprise (MNE) R&D activity. The meaning of L advantages is revisited. In addition to L advantages that are industry‐specific, the paper emphasises that there is an important category of L advantages, referred to as collocation advantages.Design/methodology/approach: Using the OLI framework, this paper highlights that the innovation activities of MNEs are about interaction of these variables, and the essential process of internalising L advantages to enhance and create firm‐specific advantages.Findings: Collocation advantages derive from spatial proximity to specific unaffiliated firms, which may be suppliers, competitors, or customers. It is also argued that L advantages are not always public goods, because they may not be available to all firms at a similar or marginal cost. These costs are associated with access and internalisation of L advantages, and – especially in the case of R&D – are attendant with the complexities of embeddedness.Originality/value: The centralisation/decentralisation, spatial separation/collocation debates in R&D location have been mistakenly viewed as a paradox facing firms, instead of as a trade‐off that firms must make.

KW - Foreign direct investment

KW - Multinational enterprises

KW - Eclectic paradigm

KW - Collocation

KW - Country-specific advantages

KW - Innovation

KW - International business

KW - Foreign direct investment

KW - Multinational enterprises

KW - Eclectic paradigm

KW - Collocation

KW - Country-specific advantages

KW - Innovation

KW - International business

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110976008701475&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/15253831211217161

DO - 10.1108/15253831211217161

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 6

EP - 25

JO - Multinational Business Review

JF - Multinational Business Review

SN - 1525-383X

IS - 1

ER -