Legitimation as Justification: Foregrounding Public Philosophies in Explanations of Gradual Ideational Change

Martin B. Carstensen, Magnus Paulsen Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualisation of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorising stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has, until recently, not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as ‘public philosophies’, are theorised to impact on institution‐building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualise the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this article seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may produce significant policy shifts over time. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state‐guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make‐work‐pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarité active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Volume58
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)582-602
Number of pages21
ISSN0304-4130
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Ideas
  • Legitimacy
  • France
  • Labour market policy
  • Reform

Cite this

@article{b2cd7c62f21e44b6847cbe425d236f19,
title = "Legitimation as Justification: Foregrounding Public Philosophies in Explanations of Gradual Ideational Change",
abstract = "In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualisation of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorising stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has, until recently, not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as ‘public philosophies’, are theorised to impact on institution‐building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualise the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this article seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may produce significant policy shifts over time. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state‐guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make‐work‐pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarit{\'e} active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.",
keywords = "Ideas, Legitimacy, France, Labour market policy, Reform, Ideas, Legitimacy, France, Labour market policy, Reform",
author = "Carstensen, {Martin B.} and Hansen, {Magnus Paulsen}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6765.12302",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "582--602",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Legitimation as Justification : Foregrounding Public Philosophies in Explanations of Gradual Ideational Change. / Carstensen, Martin B.; Hansen, Magnus Paulsen.

In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2019, p. 582-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legitimation as Justification

T2 - Foregrounding Public Philosophies in Explanations of Gradual Ideational Change

AU - Carstensen, Martin B.

AU - Hansen, Magnus Paulsen

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualisation of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorising stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has, until recently, not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as ‘public philosophies’, are theorised to impact on institution‐building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualise the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this article seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may produce significant policy shifts over time. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state‐guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make‐work‐pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarité active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.

AB - In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualisation of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorising stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has, until recently, not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as ‘public philosophies’, are theorised to impact on institution‐building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualise the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this article seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may produce significant policy shifts over time. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state‐guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make‐work‐pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarité active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.

KW - Ideas

KW - Legitimacy

KW - France

KW - Labour market policy

KW - Reform

KW - Ideas

KW - Legitimacy

KW - France

KW - Labour market policy

KW - Reform

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925512453&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6765.12302

DO - 10.1111/1475-6765.12302

M3 - Journal article

VL - 58

SP - 582

EP - 602

JO - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

IS - 2

ER -