Legitimating Change in the Public Sector

The Introduction of (Rational?) Accounting Practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria

Noel Hyndman, Mariannunziata Liguori, Renate E. Meyer, Tobias Polzer, Silvia Rota, Johann Seiwald, Ileana Steccolini

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the deployment of rhetorical legitimation strategies during public-sector accounting reforms by investigating how organizational actors justify related changes in the central governments of the United Kingdom (UK), Italy and Austria. The study shows that changes are largely legitimated (and rarely delegitimated) by key actors, with authorization strategies dominating. Country differences and actors’ professional backgrounds also impact upon the use of legitimation strategies, with those from an accounting background and working in the UK being more likely to justify change in terms of rationalization and normalization. Italian and Austrian actors more frequently resort to authorization strategies to explain accounting change.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Management Review (Print)
Volume20
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1374-1399
Number of pages26
ISSN1471-9037
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Bibliographical note

Published online: 12 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Legitimation strategies
  • Accounting change
  • Organizational change
  • Central government

Cite this

Hyndman, Noel ; Liguori, Mariannunziata ; Meyer, Renate E. ; Polzer, Tobias ; Rota, Silvia ; Seiwald, Johann ; Steccolini, Ileana. / Legitimating Change in the Public Sector : The Introduction of (Rational?) Accounting Practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria. In: Public Management Review (Print). 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 9. pp. 1374-1399.
@article{f6c3096a6d5e427aa0e2bad930ef3bdc,
title = "Legitimating Change in the Public Sector: The Introduction of (Rational?) Accounting Practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria",
abstract = "This paper explores the deployment of rhetorical legitimation strategies during public-sector accounting reforms by investigating how organizational actors justify related changes in the central governments of the United Kingdom (UK), Italy and Austria. The study shows that changes are largely legitimated (and rarely delegitimated) by key actors, with authorization strategies dominating. Country differences and actors’ professional backgrounds also impact upon the use of legitimation strategies, with those from an accounting background and working in the UK being more likely to justify change in terms of rationalization and normalization. Italian and Austrian actors more frequently resort to authorization strategies to explain accounting change.",
keywords = "Legitimation strategies, Accounting change, Organizational change, Central government, Legitimation strategies, Accounting change, Organizational change, Central government",
author = "Noel Hyndman and Mariannunziata Liguori and Meyer, {Renate E.} and Tobias Polzer and Silvia Rota and Johann Seiwald and Ileana Steccolini",
note = "Published online: 12 Oct 2017",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/14719037.2017.1383781",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1374--1399",
journal = "Public Management Review (Print)",
issn = "1471-9037",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "9",

}

Legitimating Change in the Public Sector : The Introduction of (Rational?) Accounting Practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria. / Hyndman, Noel; Liguori, Mariannunziata; Meyer, Renate E.; Polzer, Tobias; Rota, Silvia; Seiwald, Johann; Steccolini, Ileana.

In: Public Management Review (Print), Vol. 20, No. 9, 09.2018, p. 1374-1399.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legitimating Change in the Public Sector

T2 - The Introduction of (Rational?) Accounting Practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria

AU - Hyndman, Noel

AU - Liguori, Mariannunziata

AU - Meyer, Renate E.

AU - Polzer, Tobias

AU - Rota, Silvia

AU - Seiwald, Johann

AU - Steccolini, Ileana

N1 - Published online: 12 Oct 2017

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - This paper explores the deployment of rhetorical legitimation strategies during public-sector accounting reforms by investigating how organizational actors justify related changes in the central governments of the United Kingdom (UK), Italy and Austria. The study shows that changes are largely legitimated (and rarely delegitimated) by key actors, with authorization strategies dominating. Country differences and actors’ professional backgrounds also impact upon the use of legitimation strategies, with those from an accounting background and working in the UK being more likely to justify change in terms of rationalization and normalization. Italian and Austrian actors more frequently resort to authorization strategies to explain accounting change.

AB - This paper explores the deployment of rhetorical legitimation strategies during public-sector accounting reforms by investigating how organizational actors justify related changes in the central governments of the United Kingdom (UK), Italy and Austria. The study shows that changes are largely legitimated (and rarely delegitimated) by key actors, with authorization strategies dominating. Country differences and actors’ professional backgrounds also impact upon the use of legitimation strategies, with those from an accounting background and working in the UK being more likely to justify change in terms of rationalization and normalization. Italian and Austrian actors more frequently resort to authorization strategies to explain accounting change.

KW - Legitimation strategies

KW - Accounting change

KW - Organizational change

KW - Central government

KW - Legitimation strategies

KW - Accounting change

KW - Organizational change

KW - Central government

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110980863779921&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2017.1383781

DO - 10.1080/14719037.2017.1383781

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 1374

EP - 1399

JO - Public Management Review (Print)

JF - Public Management Review (Print)

SN - 1471-9037

IS - 9

ER -