Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    Abstract

    Who drives domestic institutional change in the face of international economic crisis? For rationalists the answer is powerful self-interested actors who struggle for material gains during an exogenously generated crisis. For economic constructivists it is ideational entrepreneurs who use ideas as weapons to establish paths for institutional change during crisis-driven uncertainty. Both approaches are elite-centric and conceive legitimacy as established by command or proclamation. This article establishes why domestic institutional change in response to international economic constraints must be legitimated by non-elites and how their everyday actions alter policy paths established in crisis. This is illustrated by re-examining a case frequently associated with punctuated equilibrium theories of crisis and institutional change: interwar Britain. In contrast to conventional explanations, I argue that the "legitimacy gap" between elite and broader public understandings about how the economy should work informed institutional experimentation during the 1920s and 1930s and fertilized the "Keynesian Revolution" of the 1940s.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationKøbenhavn
    PublisherDepartment of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School
    Number of pages34
    ISBN (Print)8791690145
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Cite this

    Seabrooke, L. (2005). Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy. København: Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School.
    Seabrooke, Leonard. / Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy. København : Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, 2005.
    @techreport{8f52f870dd3b11db84f6000ea68e967b,
    title = "Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy",
    abstract = "Who drives domestic institutional change in the face of international economic crisis? For rationalists the answer is powerful self-interested actors who struggle for material gains during an exogenously generated crisis. For economic constructivists it is ideational entrepreneurs who use ideas as weapons to establish paths for institutional change during crisis-driven uncertainty. Both approaches are elite-centric and conceive legitimacy as established by command or proclamation. This article establishes why domestic institutional change in response to international economic constraints must be legitimated by non-elites and how their everyday actions alter policy paths established in crisis. This is illustrated by re-examining a case frequently associated with punctuated equilibrium theories of crisis and institutional change: interwar Britain. In contrast to conventional explanations, I argue that the {"}legitimacy gap{"} between elite and broader public understandings about how the economy should work informed institutional experimentation during the 1920s and 1930s and fertilized the {"}Keynesian Revolution{"} of the 1940s.",
    keywords = "{\O}konomisk historie, {\O}konomiske kriser, {\O}konomisk-politiske strategier, Politiske institutioner, Keynesiansk skole",
    author = "Leonard Seabrooke",
    year = "2005",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "8791690145",
    publisher = "Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School",

    }

    Seabrooke, L 2005 'Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy' Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, København.

    Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy. / Seabrooke, Leonard.

    København : Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, 2005.

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy

    AU - Seabrooke, Leonard

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Who drives domestic institutional change in the face of international economic crisis? For rationalists the answer is powerful self-interested actors who struggle for material gains during an exogenously generated crisis. For economic constructivists it is ideational entrepreneurs who use ideas as weapons to establish paths for institutional change during crisis-driven uncertainty. Both approaches are elite-centric and conceive legitimacy as established by command or proclamation. This article establishes why domestic institutional change in response to international economic constraints must be legitimated by non-elites and how their everyday actions alter policy paths established in crisis. This is illustrated by re-examining a case frequently associated with punctuated equilibrium theories of crisis and institutional change: interwar Britain. In contrast to conventional explanations, I argue that the "legitimacy gap" between elite and broader public understandings about how the economy should work informed institutional experimentation during the 1920s and 1930s and fertilized the "Keynesian Revolution" of the 1940s.

    AB - Who drives domestic institutional change in the face of international economic crisis? For rationalists the answer is powerful self-interested actors who struggle for material gains during an exogenously generated crisis. For economic constructivists it is ideational entrepreneurs who use ideas as weapons to establish paths for institutional change during crisis-driven uncertainty. Both approaches are elite-centric and conceive legitimacy as established by command or proclamation. This article establishes why domestic institutional change in response to international economic constraints must be legitimated by non-elites and how their everyday actions alter policy paths established in crisis. This is illustrated by re-examining a case frequently associated with punctuated equilibrium theories of crisis and institutional change: interwar Britain. In contrast to conventional explanations, I argue that the "legitimacy gap" between elite and broader public understandings about how the economy should work informed institutional experimentation during the 1920s and 1930s and fertilized the "Keynesian Revolution" of the 1940s.

    KW - Økonomisk historie

    KW - Økonomiske kriser

    KW - Økonomisk-politiske strategier

    KW - Politiske institutioner

    KW - Keynesiansk skole

    M3 - Working paper

    SN - 8791690145

    BT - Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy

    PB - Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School

    CY - København

    ER -

    Seabrooke L. Legitimacy Gaps and Everyday Institutional Change in Interwar British Economy. København: Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School. 2005.