Least-developed Countries in a World of Global Value Chains: Are WTO Trade Negotiations Helping?

Daniel Flentø, Stefano Ponte

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    179 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Nimble trade and industrial policy is essential for Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) to thrive in a world of global value chains (GVCs). “Adaptive states” in LDCs need to create and exploit policy space in national decision-making, build specific production capabilities to participate and meaningfully capture value in GVCs, and handle policy stretches arising from factors and actors they cannot control. In this article, we show that the outcomes of recent multilateral trade negotiations will facilitate these processes only partially. The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Bali and Nairobi Ministerial Declarations have been commonly portrayed as relative victories for developing countries, but they have not provided sufficient steps forward for LDCs. While the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement can help integration into GVCs by enabling freer imports and exports, supportive industrial policies are also needed to guide investment in the direction that allows for flexible specialization and domestic value addition—these options are severely limited in the current WTO regime. The legally binding commitments made in Nairobi on rules of origin are also a positive step, but must be linked to the yet unmet duty-free and quota-free commitments. We conclude by arguing that a future agenda for LDCs should focus on supply-side constraints, as well as on allowing nimble industrial and trade policies that can facilitate meaningful participation in some GVCs—and non-participation in others that are more detrimental to broad-based development.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalWorld Development
    Volume94
    Pages (from-to)366-374
    Number of pages9
    ISSN0305-750X
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Bibliographical note

    Published online: 15. February 2017

    Keywords

    • Global value chains
    • LDCs
    • WTO negotiations
    • Trade and industrial policy
    • Adaptive state

    Cite this

    @article{03123bd676524c2e8d739358536f8350,
    title = "Least-developed Countries in a World of Global Value Chains: Are WTO Trade Negotiations Helping?",
    abstract = "Nimble trade and industrial policy is essential for Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) to thrive in a world of global value chains (GVCs). “Adaptive states” in LDCs need to create and exploit policy space in national decision-making, build specific production capabilities to participate and meaningfully capture value in GVCs, and handle policy stretches arising from factors and actors they cannot control. In this article, we show that the outcomes of recent multilateral trade negotiations will facilitate these processes only partially. The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Bali and Nairobi Ministerial Declarations have been commonly portrayed as relative victories for developing countries, but they have not provided sufficient steps forward for LDCs. While the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement can help integration into GVCs by enabling freer imports and exports, supportive industrial policies are also needed to guide investment in the direction that allows for flexible specialization and domestic value addition—these options are severely limited in the current WTO regime. The legally binding commitments made in Nairobi on rules of origin are also a positive step, but must be linked to the yet unmet duty-free and quota-free commitments. We conclude by arguing that a future agenda for LDCs should focus on supply-side constraints, as well as on allowing nimble industrial and trade policies that can facilitate meaningful participation in some GVCs—and non-participation in others that are more detrimental to broad-based development.",
    keywords = "Global value chains, LDCs, WTO negotiations, Trade and industrial policy, Adaptive state, Global value chains, LDCs, WTO negotiations, Trade and industrial policy, Adaptive state",
    author = "Daniel Flent{\o} and Stefano Ponte",
    note = "Published online: 15. February 2017",
    year = "2017",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.020",
    language = "English",
    volume = "94",
    pages = "366--374",
    journal = "World Development",
    issn = "0305-750X",
    publisher = "Pergamon Press",

    }

    Least-developed Countries in a World of Global Value Chains : Are WTO Trade Negotiations Helping? / Flentø, Daniel; Ponte, Stefano.

    In: World Development, Vol. 94, 06.2017, p. 366-374.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Least-developed Countries in a World of Global Value Chains

    T2 - Are WTO Trade Negotiations Helping?

    AU - Flentø, Daniel

    AU - Ponte, Stefano

    N1 - Published online: 15. February 2017

    PY - 2017/6

    Y1 - 2017/6

    N2 - Nimble trade and industrial policy is essential for Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) to thrive in a world of global value chains (GVCs). “Adaptive states” in LDCs need to create and exploit policy space in national decision-making, build specific production capabilities to participate and meaningfully capture value in GVCs, and handle policy stretches arising from factors and actors they cannot control. In this article, we show that the outcomes of recent multilateral trade negotiations will facilitate these processes only partially. The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Bali and Nairobi Ministerial Declarations have been commonly portrayed as relative victories for developing countries, but they have not provided sufficient steps forward for LDCs. While the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement can help integration into GVCs by enabling freer imports and exports, supportive industrial policies are also needed to guide investment in the direction that allows for flexible specialization and domestic value addition—these options are severely limited in the current WTO regime. The legally binding commitments made in Nairobi on rules of origin are also a positive step, but must be linked to the yet unmet duty-free and quota-free commitments. We conclude by arguing that a future agenda for LDCs should focus on supply-side constraints, as well as on allowing nimble industrial and trade policies that can facilitate meaningful participation in some GVCs—and non-participation in others that are more detrimental to broad-based development.

    AB - Nimble trade and industrial policy is essential for Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) to thrive in a world of global value chains (GVCs). “Adaptive states” in LDCs need to create and exploit policy space in national decision-making, build specific production capabilities to participate and meaningfully capture value in GVCs, and handle policy stretches arising from factors and actors they cannot control. In this article, we show that the outcomes of recent multilateral trade negotiations will facilitate these processes only partially. The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Bali and Nairobi Ministerial Declarations have been commonly portrayed as relative victories for developing countries, but they have not provided sufficient steps forward for LDCs. While the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement can help integration into GVCs by enabling freer imports and exports, supportive industrial policies are also needed to guide investment in the direction that allows for flexible specialization and domestic value addition—these options are severely limited in the current WTO regime. The legally binding commitments made in Nairobi on rules of origin are also a positive step, but must be linked to the yet unmet duty-free and quota-free commitments. We conclude by arguing that a future agenda for LDCs should focus on supply-side constraints, as well as on allowing nimble industrial and trade policies that can facilitate meaningful participation in some GVCs—and non-participation in others that are more detrimental to broad-based development.

    KW - Global value chains

    KW - LDCs

    KW - WTO negotiations

    KW - Trade and industrial policy

    KW - Adaptive state

    KW - Global value chains

    KW - LDCs

    KW - WTO negotiations

    KW - Trade and industrial policy

    KW - Adaptive state

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921388922&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.020

    DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.020

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 94

    SP - 366

    EP - 374

    JO - World Development

    JF - World Development

    SN - 0305-750X

    ER -