Learning from Incidents

Dane Lukic, Allison Littlejohn, Anoush Margaryan

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Abstract

Purpose: This paper seeks to review current approaches to learning from health and safety incidents in the workplace. The aim of the paper is to identify the diversity of approaches and analyse them in terms of learning aspects.
Design/methodology/approach
: A literature review was conducted searching for terms incident/accident/near misses/disaster/crisis modified with learning/training and safety. Shortlisted articles were analysed by questioning who is learning, what kind of learning process is undertaken, what type of knowledge is employed and the type of problem that these incidents addressed. Current approaches to learning from incidents were critically analysed and gaps identified.
Findings: Very few papers addressed all the envisaged aspects when developing their learning from incidents approaches. With support from literature, it was concluded that all the four perspectives, namely participants of learning (participation and inclusion), learning process (single loop, double learning), type of incident and its relation to learning (Cynefin complexity framework) and types of knowledge (conceptual, procedural, dispositional and locative) are important when deciding on an appropriate learning from incidents approach.
Research limitations/implications: The literature review focused on journal articles and identified keywords, which might have narrowed the scope. Further research is needed in identifying ways to embed the learning from incidents aspects in the organisation.
Practical implications: The framework developed could be useful by safety planners, safety managers, human resource managers and researchers in the area of organisational learning and safety.
Originality/value
: The paper concludes by outlining key questions and proposing a framework that could be useful in systematically analysing and identifying effective approaches to learning from incidents.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPetroleum Review
Volume66
Issue number790
Pages (from-to)36–37
ISSN0020-3076
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Learning from incidents
  • Organisational learning
  • Workplace learning
  • Professional learning
  • Health and safety

Cite this

Lukic, D., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2012). Learning from Incidents. Petroleum Review, 66(790), 36–37.
Lukic, Dane ; Littlejohn, Allison ; Margaryan, Anoush . / Learning from Incidents. In: Petroleum Review. 2012 ; Vol. 66, No. 790. pp. 36–37.
@article{e9a4f962197646dcbd003f96cdb94aae,
title = "Learning from Incidents",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper seeks to review current approaches to learning from health and safety incidents in the workplace. The aim of the paper is to identify the diversity of approaches and analyse them in terms of learning aspects.Design/methodology/approach: A literature review was conducted searching for terms incident/accident/near misses/disaster/crisis modified with learning/training and safety. Shortlisted articles were analysed by questioning who is learning, what kind of learning process is undertaken, what type of knowledge is employed and the type of problem that these incidents addressed. Current approaches to learning from incidents were critically analysed and gaps identified.Findings: Very few papers addressed all the envisaged aspects when developing their learning from incidents approaches. With support from literature, it was concluded that all the four perspectives, namely participants of learning (participation and inclusion), learning process (single loop, double learning), type of incident and its relation to learning (Cynefin complexity framework) and types of knowledge (conceptual, procedural, dispositional and locative) are important when deciding on an appropriate learning from incidents approach.Research limitations/implications: The literature review focused on journal articles and identified keywords, which might have narrowed the scope. Further research is needed in identifying ways to embed the learning from incidents aspects in the organisation.Practical implications: The framework developed could be useful by safety planners, safety managers, human resource managers and researchers in the area of organisational learning and safety.Originality/value: The paper concludes by outlining key questions and proposing a framework that could be useful in systematically analysing and identifying effective approaches to learning from incidents.",
keywords = "Learning from incidents, Organisational learning, Workplace learning, Professional learning, Health and safety, Learning from incidents, Organisational learning, Workplace learning, Professional learning, Health and safety",
author = "Dane Lukic and Allison Littlejohn and Anoush Margaryan",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "36–37",
journal = "Petroleum Review",
issn = "0020-3076",
publisher = "Energy Institute",
number = "790",

}

Lukic, D, Littlejohn, A & Margaryan, A 2012, 'Learning from Incidents', Petroleum Review, vol. 66, no. 790, pp. 36–37.

Learning from Incidents. / Lukic, Dane; Littlejohn, Allison; Margaryan, Anoush .

In: Petroleum Review, Vol. 66, No. 790, 2012, p. 36–37.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning from Incidents

AU - Lukic, Dane

AU - Littlejohn, Allison

AU - Margaryan, Anoush

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: This paper seeks to review current approaches to learning from health and safety incidents in the workplace. The aim of the paper is to identify the diversity of approaches and analyse them in terms of learning aspects.Design/methodology/approach: A literature review was conducted searching for terms incident/accident/near misses/disaster/crisis modified with learning/training and safety. Shortlisted articles were analysed by questioning who is learning, what kind of learning process is undertaken, what type of knowledge is employed and the type of problem that these incidents addressed. Current approaches to learning from incidents were critically analysed and gaps identified.Findings: Very few papers addressed all the envisaged aspects when developing their learning from incidents approaches. With support from literature, it was concluded that all the four perspectives, namely participants of learning (participation and inclusion), learning process (single loop, double learning), type of incident and its relation to learning (Cynefin complexity framework) and types of knowledge (conceptual, procedural, dispositional and locative) are important when deciding on an appropriate learning from incidents approach.Research limitations/implications: The literature review focused on journal articles and identified keywords, which might have narrowed the scope. Further research is needed in identifying ways to embed the learning from incidents aspects in the organisation.Practical implications: The framework developed could be useful by safety planners, safety managers, human resource managers and researchers in the area of organisational learning and safety.Originality/value: The paper concludes by outlining key questions and proposing a framework that could be useful in systematically analysing and identifying effective approaches to learning from incidents.

AB - Purpose: This paper seeks to review current approaches to learning from health and safety incidents in the workplace. The aim of the paper is to identify the diversity of approaches and analyse them in terms of learning aspects.Design/methodology/approach: A literature review was conducted searching for terms incident/accident/near misses/disaster/crisis modified with learning/training and safety. Shortlisted articles were analysed by questioning who is learning, what kind of learning process is undertaken, what type of knowledge is employed and the type of problem that these incidents addressed. Current approaches to learning from incidents were critically analysed and gaps identified.Findings: Very few papers addressed all the envisaged aspects when developing their learning from incidents approaches. With support from literature, it was concluded that all the four perspectives, namely participants of learning (participation and inclusion), learning process (single loop, double learning), type of incident and its relation to learning (Cynefin complexity framework) and types of knowledge (conceptual, procedural, dispositional and locative) are important when deciding on an appropriate learning from incidents approach.Research limitations/implications: The literature review focused on journal articles and identified keywords, which might have narrowed the scope. Further research is needed in identifying ways to embed the learning from incidents aspects in the organisation.Practical implications: The framework developed could be useful by safety planners, safety managers, human resource managers and researchers in the area of organisational learning and safety.Originality/value: The paper concludes by outlining key questions and proposing a framework that could be useful in systematically analysing and identifying effective approaches to learning from incidents.

KW - Learning from incidents

KW - Organisational learning

KW - Workplace learning

KW - Professional learning

KW - Health and safety

KW - Learning from incidents

KW - Organisational learning

KW - Workplace learning

KW - Professional learning

KW - Health and safety

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110975506068903&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

M3 - Journal article

VL - 66

SP - 36

EP - 37

JO - Petroleum Review

JF - Petroleum Review

SN - 0020-3076

IS - 790

ER -

Lukic D, Littlejohn A, Margaryan A. Learning from Incidents. Petroleum Review. 2012;66(790):36–37.