Leadership, Beliefs and Coordination: An Explorative Discussion

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Although recent economics contributions represent important strides forward in the understanding of leadership behavior, the cognitive and symbolic dimensions of the phenomenon have attracted virtually no interests from economists and game theorists. I argue that an understanding of these dimensions may be founded on coordination games, particularly to the extent that these illustrate interactive belief formation. In this context, leadership is defined as the taking of actions that coordinate the complementary actions of many people through the creation of belief conditions that (at least) substitute for common knowledge, and where these actions characteristically consists of some act of communication directed at those being led. The concept of common knowledge (or, its approximation by means of notions of common belief) is argued to be particularly important to understanding leadership. Thus, leaders may establish common knowledge conditions, and assist the coordination of strategies in this way, or make decisions in situations where coordination problems persist in spite of common knowledge.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationKøbenhavn
    PublisherThe Link Program
    Number of pages33
    Publication statusPublished - 2000
    SeriesLINK Working Paper
    Number10

    Cite this

    Foss, N. J. (2000). Leadership, Beliefs and Coordination: An Explorative Discussion. København: The Link Program. LINK Working Paper, No. 10
    Foss, Nicolai J. / Leadership, Beliefs and Coordination : An Explorative Discussion. København : The Link Program, 2000. (LINK Working Paper; No. 10).
    @techreport{11b26c653fdd44e8b03b4379772392b9,
    title = "Leadership, Beliefs and Coordination: An Explorative Discussion",
    abstract = "Although recent economics contributions represent important strides forward in the understanding of leadership behavior, the cognitive and symbolic dimensions of the phenomenon have attracted virtually no interests from economists and game theorists. I argue that an understanding of these dimensions may be founded on coordination games, particularly to the extent that these illustrate interactive belief formation. In this context, leadership is defined as the taking of actions that coordinate the complementary actions of many people through the creation of belief conditions that (at least) substitute for common knowledge, and where these actions characteristically consists of some act of communication directed at those being led. The concept of common knowledge (or, its approximation by means of notions of common belief) is argued to be particularly important to understanding leadership. Thus, leaders may establish common knowledge conditions, and assist the coordination of strategies in this way, or make decisions in situations where coordination problems persist in spite of common knowledge.",
    author = "Foss, {Nicolai J.}",
    year = "2000",
    language = "English",
    series = "LINK Working Paper",
    publisher = "The Link Program",
    number = "10",
    address = "Denmark",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "The Link Program",

    }

    Leadership, Beliefs and Coordination : An Explorative Discussion. / Foss, Nicolai J.

    København : The Link Program, 2000.

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Leadership, Beliefs and Coordination

    T2 - An Explorative Discussion

    AU - Foss, Nicolai J.

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - Although recent economics contributions represent important strides forward in the understanding of leadership behavior, the cognitive and symbolic dimensions of the phenomenon have attracted virtually no interests from economists and game theorists. I argue that an understanding of these dimensions may be founded on coordination games, particularly to the extent that these illustrate interactive belief formation. In this context, leadership is defined as the taking of actions that coordinate the complementary actions of many people through the creation of belief conditions that (at least) substitute for common knowledge, and where these actions characteristically consists of some act of communication directed at those being led. The concept of common knowledge (or, its approximation by means of notions of common belief) is argued to be particularly important to understanding leadership. Thus, leaders may establish common knowledge conditions, and assist the coordination of strategies in this way, or make decisions in situations where coordination problems persist in spite of common knowledge.

    AB - Although recent economics contributions represent important strides forward in the understanding of leadership behavior, the cognitive and symbolic dimensions of the phenomenon have attracted virtually no interests from economists and game theorists. I argue that an understanding of these dimensions may be founded on coordination games, particularly to the extent that these illustrate interactive belief formation. In this context, leadership is defined as the taking of actions that coordinate the complementary actions of many people through the creation of belief conditions that (at least) substitute for common knowledge, and where these actions characteristically consists of some act of communication directed at those being led. The concept of common knowledge (or, its approximation by means of notions of common belief) is argued to be particularly important to understanding leadership. Thus, leaders may establish common knowledge conditions, and assist the coordination of strategies in this way, or make decisions in situations where coordination problems persist in spite of common knowledge.

    M3 - Working paper

    T3 - LINK Working Paper

    BT - Leadership, Beliefs and Coordination

    PB - The Link Program

    CY - København

    ER -