Lawful Distortion of Consumers’ Economic Behaviour: Collateral Damage Under the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive prohibits unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices with a view to protect consumers’ economic interests. In a market economy such regulation cannot protect the economic interests of all consumers in all situations – there must inevitably be some ‘collateral damage’. In that vein this article discusses situations where consumers may have their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices that are not unfair under the Directive. It is expected that many consumers will make relatively good decisions most of the time and that there will be a ‘long tail’ of more vulnerable consumers. The fact that the law allows certain forms of ‘economic distortion’ affects those who have general difficulties in making economic decisions (‘Long Tail Natives’) and all other consumers who, occasionally, are likely to make inferior decisions (‘Long Tail Visitors’). The article suggests how behavioural sciences may be applied to understand these situations in order to protect more consumers from having their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices. It is suggested that per se prohibitions may be advantageous in some instances as long as traders are not deprived of effective means to inform consumers about themselves and their products.
    The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive prohibits unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices with a view to protect consumers’ economic interests. In a market economy such regulation cannot protect the economic interests of all consumers in all situations – there must inevitably be some ‘collateral damage’. In that vein this article discusses situations where consumers may have their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices that are not unfair under the Directive. It is expected that many consumers will make relatively good decisions most of the time and that there will be a ‘long tail’ of more vulnerable consumers. The fact that the law allows certain forms of ‘economic distortion’ affects those who have general difficulties in making economic decisions (‘Long Tail Natives’) and all other consumers who, occasionally, are likely to make inferior decisions (‘Long Tail Visitors’). The article suggests how behavioural sciences may be applied to understand these situations in order to protect more consumers from having their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices. It is suggested that per se prohibitions may be advantageous in some instances as long as traders are not deprived of effective means to inform consumers about themselves and their products.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Business Law Review
    Volume27
    Issue number1
    Pages25-49
    ISSN0959-6941
    StatePublished - 2016

    Cite this

    @article{454072aefb0b48279c863613d7c00ca1,
    title = "Lawful Distortion of Consumers’ Economic Behaviour: Collateral Damage Under the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive",
    abstract = "The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive prohibits unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices with a view to protect consumers’ economic interests. In a market economy such regulation cannot protect the economic interests of all consumers in all situations – there must inevitably be some ‘collateral damage’. In that vein this article discusses situations where consumers may have their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices that are not unfair under the Directive. It is expected that many consumers will make relatively good decisions most of the time and that there will be a ‘long tail’ of more vulnerable consumers. The fact that the law allows certain forms of ‘economic distortion’ affects those who have general difficulties in making economic decisions (‘Long Tail Natives’) and all other consumers who, occasionally, are likely to make inferior decisions (‘Long Tail Visitors’). The article suggests how behavioural sciences may be applied to understand these situations in order to protect more consumers from having their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices. It is suggested that per se prohibitions may be advantageous in some instances as long as traders are not deprived of effective means to inform consumers about themselves and their products.",
    author = "Jan Trzaskowski",
    year = "2016",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "25--49",
    journal = "European Business Law Review",
    issn = "0959-6941",
    publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
    number = "1",

    }

    Lawful Distortion of Consumers’ Economic Behaviour : Collateral Damage Under the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. / Trzaskowski, Jan.

    In: European Business Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2016, p. 25-49.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Lawful Distortion of Consumers’ Economic Behaviour

    T2 - European Business Law Review

    AU - Trzaskowski,Jan

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive prohibits unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices with a view to protect consumers’ economic interests. In a market economy such regulation cannot protect the economic interests of all consumers in all situations – there must inevitably be some ‘collateral damage’. In that vein this article discusses situations where consumers may have their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices that are not unfair under the Directive. It is expected that many consumers will make relatively good decisions most of the time and that there will be a ‘long tail’ of more vulnerable consumers. The fact that the law allows certain forms of ‘economic distortion’ affects those who have general difficulties in making economic decisions (‘Long Tail Natives’) and all other consumers who, occasionally, are likely to make inferior decisions (‘Long Tail Visitors’). The article suggests how behavioural sciences may be applied to understand these situations in order to protect more consumers from having their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices. It is suggested that per se prohibitions may be advantageous in some instances as long as traders are not deprived of effective means to inform consumers about themselves and their products.

    AB - The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive prohibits unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices with a view to protect consumers’ economic interests. In a market economy such regulation cannot protect the economic interests of all consumers in all situations – there must inevitably be some ‘collateral damage’. In that vein this article discusses situations where consumers may have their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices that are not unfair under the Directive. It is expected that many consumers will make relatively good decisions most of the time and that there will be a ‘long tail’ of more vulnerable consumers. The fact that the law allows certain forms of ‘economic distortion’ affects those who have general difficulties in making economic decisions (‘Long Tail Natives’) and all other consumers who, occasionally, are likely to make inferior decisions (‘Long Tail Visitors’). The article suggests how behavioural sciences may be applied to understand these situations in order to protect more consumers from having their economic behaviour distorted by commercial practices. It is suggested that per se prohibitions may be advantageous in some instances as long as traders are not deprived of effective means to inform consumers about themselves and their products.

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 27

    SP - 25

    EP - 49

    JO - European Business Law Review

    JF - European Business Law Review

    SN - 0959-6941

    IS - 1

    ER -