TY - JOUR
T1 - Labor Diversity and Firm Productivity
AU - Parrotta, Pierpaolo
AU - Pozzoli, Dario
AU - Pytlikova, Mariola
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Using a matched employer–employee data-set, we analyze how workforce diversity associates with the productivity of firms in Denmark, following two main econometric routes. In the first one, we estimate a standard Cobb–Douglas function, calculate the implied total factor productivity and relate the latter to diversity statistics in a second stage. This reduced-form approach allows us to identify which types of labor heterogeneity appear to descriptively matter. In the second approach, we move toward a richer production function specification, which takes different types of labor as inputs and that allows for flexible substitution patterns, and possible quality differences between types. Both methods show that workforce diversity in ethnicity is negatively associated with firm productivity. The evidence regarding diversity in education is mixed.
AB - Using a matched employer–employee data-set, we analyze how workforce diversity associates with the productivity of firms in Denmark, following two main econometric routes. In the first one, we estimate a standard Cobb–Douglas function, calculate the implied total factor productivity and relate the latter to diversity statistics in a second stage. This reduced-form approach allows us to identify which types of labor heterogeneity appear to descriptively matter. In the second approach, we move toward a richer production function specification, which takes different types of labor as inputs and that allows for flexible substitution patterns, and possible quality differences between types. Both methods show that workforce diversity in ethnicity is negatively associated with firm productivity. The evidence regarding diversity in education is mixed.
KW - Labor diversity
KW - Substitutability
KW - Complementarity
KW - Communication barriers
KW - Total factor productivity
U2 - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.002
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0014-2921
VL - 66
SP - 144
EP - 179
JO - European Economic Review
JF - European Economic Review
ER -