Labor Diversity and Firm Productivity

Pierpaolo Parrotta, Dario Pozzoli, Mariola Pytlikova

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Using a matched employer–employee data-set, we analyze how workforce diversity associates with the productivity of firms in Denmark, following two main econometric routes. In the first one, we estimate a standard Cobb–Douglas function, calculate the implied total factor productivity and relate the latter to diversity statistics in a second stage. This reduced-form approach allows us to identify which types of labor heterogeneity appear to descriptively matter. In the second approach, we move toward a richer production function specification, which takes different types of labor as inputs and that allows for flexible substitution patterns, and possible quality differences between types. Both methods show that workforce diversity in ethnicity is negatively associated with firm productivity. The evidence regarding diversity in education is mixed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Economic Review
Volume66
Pages (from-to)144–179
ISSN0014-2921
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Parrotta, Pierpaolo ; Pozzoli, Dario ; Pytlikova, Mariola. / Labor Diversity and Firm Productivity. In: European Economic Review. 2014 ; Vol. 66. pp. 144–179.
@article{41e5500e846247279441979a680465f5,
title = "Labor Diversity and Firm Productivity",
abstract = "Using a matched employer–employee data-set, we analyze how workforce diversity associates with the productivity of firms in Denmark, following two main econometric routes. In the first one, we estimate a standard Cobb–Douglas function, calculate the implied total factor productivity and relate the latter to diversity statistics in a second stage. This reduced-form approach allows us to identify which types of labor heterogeneity appear to descriptively matter. In the second approach, we move toward a richer production function specification, which takes different types of labor as inputs and that allows for flexible substitution patterns, and possible quality differences between types. Both methods show that workforce diversity in ethnicity is negatively associated with firm productivity. The evidence regarding diversity in education is mixed.",
keywords = "Labor diversity, Substitutability, Complementarity, Communication barriers, Total factor productivity",
author = "Pierpaolo Parrotta and Dario Pozzoli and Mariola Pytlikova",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "144–179",
journal = "European Economic Review",
issn = "0014-2921",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Labor Diversity and Firm Productivity. / Parrotta, Pierpaolo; Pozzoli, Dario ; Pytlikova, Mariola.

In: European Economic Review, Vol. 66, 2014, p. 144–179.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Labor Diversity and Firm Productivity

AU - Parrotta, Pierpaolo

AU - Pozzoli, Dario

AU - Pytlikova, Mariola

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Using a matched employer–employee data-set, we analyze how workforce diversity associates with the productivity of firms in Denmark, following two main econometric routes. In the first one, we estimate a standard Cobb–Douglas function, calculate the implied total factor productivity and relate the latter to diversity statistics in a second stage. This reduced-form approach allows us to identify which types of labor heterogeneity appear to descriptively matter. In the second approach, we move toward a richer production function specification, which takes different types of labor as inputs and that allows for flexible substitution patterns, and possible quality differences between types. Both methods show that workforce diversity in ethnicity is negatively associated with firm productivity. The evidence regarding diversity in education is mixed.

AB - Using a matched employer–employee data-set, we analyze how workforce diversity associates with the productivity of firms in Denmark, following two main econometric routes. In the first one, we estimate a standard Cobb–Douglas function, calculate the implied total factor productivity and relate the latter to diversity statistics in a second stage. This reduced-form approach allows us to identify which types of labor heterogeneity appear to descriptively matter. In the second approach, we move toward a richer production function specification, which takes different types of labor as inputs and that allows for flexible substitution patterns, and possible quality differences between types. Both methods show that workforce diversity in ethnicity is negatively associated with firm productivity. The evidence regarding diversity in education is mixed.

KW - Labor diversity

KW - Substitutability

KW - Complementarity

KW - Communication barriers

KW - Total factor productivity

U2 - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 66

SP - 144

EP - 179

JO - European Economic Review

JF - European Economic Review

SN - 0014-2921

ER -