Abstract
Political decision-makers in the European Union (EU) are currently discussing the introduction of a mandatory uniform labelling scheme for meat and milk that provides information on husbandry systems similar to the already existent labelling scheme in the EU egg market. The objective of this paper was to assess whether such information is relevant to consumers when buying meat and milk. The paper was based on a systematic synthesis of 53 scientific journal articles on empirical consumer studies. The review revealed that consumers perceived the aspects of outdoor access, stocking density and floor type as important factors influencing animal welfare. On average, consumers not only had a positive attitude towards more animal welfare-friendly husbandry systems with outdoor access and space allowance but were also willing to pay a price premium for products from such systems. All studies on consumer segmentation identified at least one consumer segment that placed great importance on animal welfare-friendly husbandry systems. Interestingly, many studies identified one or more other segments who still had a significant preference for animal welfare-friendly products even though other product attributes were more important to them. Based on the findings, the paper presents conclusions regarding the labelling of husbandry systems for meat and milk.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 6 |
Pages (from-to) | 1071–1100 |
Number of pages | 30 |
ISSN | 1187-7863 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Animal welfare
- Production system
- Label
- Credence good
- Willingness-to-pay