Knowledge-Sharing Hostility and Governance Mechanisms: An Empirical Test

Kenneth Husted, Snejina Michailova, Dana Minbaeva, Torben Pedersen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose – This paper aims at further developing and empirically examining the concept of knowledge-sharing hostility. It seeks to analyze reasons for hoarding knowledge, reasons for rejecting external knowledge, and attitudes towards mistakes, as well as the influence of these factors on actual knowledge-sharing behavior. The paper aims to examine how two specific knowledge-governance mechanisms – commitment-based and transaction-based mechanisms – affect knowledge sharing

    Design/methodology/approach – The authors test the hypotheses on a sample of 1,639 respondents in 15 organizations in Denmark.

    Findings – The authors find that the use of transaction-based mechanisms promotes knowledge-sharing hostility by strengthening individuals' reasons for hoarding and rejecting knowledge, and by negatively affecting individuals' attitudes towards sharing knowledge about mistakes. In contrast, the use of commitment-based mechanisms diminishes knowledge-sharing hostility among individuals.

    Originality/value – The contribution of the paper is two-fold. First, it responds to the clear need to examine individual characteristics related to withholding knowledge in organizations. Second, by delineating specific organizational governance mechanisms that are critical for dealing with knowledge-sharing hostility, the research responds to the call for research aimed at explaining and detailing problems that lie in the intersection of organization and knowledge processes.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Knowledge Management
    Volume16
    Issue number5
    Pages (from-to)754-773
    ISSN1367-3270
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • Knowledge-sharing behaviour
    • Individual Behaviour
    • Knowledge Transfer
    • Denmark
    • Governance Mechanisms
    • Knowledge-sharing hostility

    Cite this

    @article{bcc13cba67004af5abc17626179bba05,
    title = "Knowledge-Sharing Hostility and Governance Mechanisms: An Empirical Test",
    abstract = "Purpose – This paper aims at further developing and empirically examining the concept of knowledge-sharing hostility. It seeks to analyze reasons for hoarding knowledge, reasons for rejecting external knowledge, and attitudes towards mistakes, as well as the influence of these factors on actual knowledge-sharing behavior. The paper aims to examine how two specific knowledge-governance mechanisms – commitment-based and transaction-based mechanisms – affect knowledge sharingDesign/methodology/approach – The authors test the hypotheses on a sample of 1,639 respondents in 15 organizations in Denmark.Findings – The authors find that the use of transaction-based mechanisms promotes knowledge-sharing hostility by strengthening individuals' reasons for hoarding and rejecting knowledge, and by negatively affecting individuals' attitudes towards sharing knowledge about mistakes. In contrast, the use of commitment-based mechanisms diminishes knowledge-sharing hostility among individuals.Originality/value – The contribution of the paper is two-fold. First, it responds to the clear need to examine individual characteristics related to withholding knowledge in organizations. Second, by delineating specific organizational governance mechanisms that are critical for dealing with knowledge-sharing hostility, the research responds to the call for research aimed at explaining and detailing problems that lie in the intersection of organization and knowledge processes.",
    keywords = "Knowledge-sharing behaviour , Individual Behaviour, Knowledge Transfer , Denmark, Governance Mechanisms, Knowledge-sharing hostility",
    author = "Kenneth Husted and Snejina Michailova and Dana Minbaeva and Torben Pedersen",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1108/13673271211262790",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "754--773",
    journal = "Journal of Knowledge Management",
    issn = "1367-3270",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
    number = "5",

    }

    Knowledge-Sharing Hostility and Governance Mechanisms : An Empirical Test. / Husted, Kenneth; Michailova, Snejina; Minbaeva, Dana; Pedersen, Torben.

    In: Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2012, p. 754-773.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Knowledge-Sharing Hostility and Governance Mechanisms

    T2 - An Empirical Test

    AU - Husted, Kenneth

    AU - Michailova, Snejina

    AU - Minbaeva, Dana

    AU - Pedersen, Torben

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Purpose – This paper aims at further developing and empirically examining the concept of knowledge-sharing hostility. It seeks to analyze reasons for hoarding knowledge, reasons for rejecting external knowledge, and attitudes towards mistakes, as well as the influence of these factors on actual knowledge-sharing behavior. The paper aims to examine how two specific knowledge-governance mechanisms – commitment-based and transaction-based mechanisms – affect knowledge sharingDesign/methodology/approach – The authors test the hypotheses on a sample of 1,639 respondents in 15 organizations in Denmark.Findings – The authors find that the use of transaction-based mechanisms promotes knowledge-sharing hostility by strengthening individuals' reasons for hoarding and rejecting knowledge, and by negatively affecting individuals' attitudes towards sharing knowledge about mistakes. In contrast, the use of commitment-based mechanisms diminishes knowledge-sharing hostility among individuals.Originality/value – The contribution of the paper is two-fold. First, it responds to the clear need to examine individual characteristics related to withholding knowledge in organizations. Second, by delineating specific organizational governance mechanisms that are critical for dealing with knowledge-sharing hostility, the research responds to the call for research aimed at explaining and detailing problems that lie in the intersection of organization and knowledge processes.

    AB - Purpose – This paper aims at further developing and empirically examining the concept of knowledge-sharing hostility. It seeks to analyze reasons for hoarding knowledge, reasons for rejecting external knowledge, and attitudes towards mistakes, as well as the influence of these factors on actual knowledge-sharing behavior. The paper aims to examine how two specific knowledge-governance mechanisms – commitment-based and transaction-based mechanisms – affect knowledge sharingDesign/methodology/approach – The authors test the hypotheses on a sample of 1,639 respondents in 15 organizations in Denmark.Findings – The authors find that the use of transaction-based mechanisms promotes knowledge-sharing hostility by strengthening individuals' reasons for hoarding and rejecting knowledge, and by negatively affecting individuals' attitudes towards sharing knowledge about mistakes. In contrast, the use of commitment-based mechanisms diminishes knowledge-sharing hostility among individuals.Originality/value – The contribution of the paper is two-fold. First, it responds to the clear need to examine individual characteristics related to withholding knowledge in organizations. Second, by delineating specific organizational governance mechanisms that are critical for dealing with knowledge-sharing hostility, the research responds to the call for research aimed at explaining and detailing problems that lie in the intersection of organization and knowledge processes.

    KW - Knowledge-sharing behaviour

    KW - Individual Behaviour

    KW - Knowledge Transfer

    KW - Denmark

    KW - Governance Mechanisms

    KW - Knowledge-sharing hostility

    U2 - 10.1108/13673271211262790

    DO - 10.1108/13673271211262790

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 16

    SP - 754

    EP - 773

    JO - Journal of Knowledge Management

    JF - Journal of Knowledge Management

    SN - 1367-3270

    IS - 5

    ER -