Keeping Things Mindfully on Track

Organizational Learning under Continuity

Tor Hernes, Eirik J. Irgens

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We take a critical look at the widespread assumption that organizational learning is associated with a mismatch between expectations and outcomes. While mismatch is central to studying organizational learning, we argue that continuity is equally important. Learning under continuity requires an investment of effort, mindfulness and preparedness for change, even if no perceptible change occurs. Although the organizational literature has to some extent dealt with learning under continuity, putting it more firmly on the organizational learning agenda is necessary. A central element of a more explicit focus on learning under continuity, we argue, is to take a temporal view of organizational learning that includes agency at organizational level. We discuss how, from a temporal view, learning under continuity entails the (1) assessment of present courses of action; (2) exploration of future courses of action; and (3) re-interpretation of past courses of action.

Original languageEnglish
JournalManagement Learning
Volume44
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)253-266
ISSN1350-5076
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Cite this

@article{79d360566d6d4e19acd78d158b0607d8,
title = "Keeping Things Mindfully on Track: Organizational Learning under Continuity",
abstract = "We take a critical look at the widespread assumption that organizational learning is associated with a mismatch between expectations and outcomes. While mismatch is central to studying organizational learning, we argue that continuity is equally important. Learning under continuity requires an investment of effort, mindfulness and preparedness for change, even if no perceptible change occurs. Although the organizational literature has to some extent dealt with learning under continuity, putting it more firmly on the organizational learning agenda is necessary. A central element of a more explicit focus on learning under continuity, we argue, is to take a temporal view of organizational learning that includes agency at organizational level. We discuss how, from a temporal view, learning under continuity entails the (1) assessment of present courses of action; (2) exploration of future courses of action; and (3) re-interpretation of past courses of action.",
keywords = "Agency, Leadership, Mindfulness, Organizational learning, Process view, Temporality",
author = "Tor Hernes and Irgens, {Eirik J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1350507612445258",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "253--266",
journal = "Management Learning",
issn = "1350-5076",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Keeping Things Mindfully on Track : Organizational Learning under Continuity . / Hernes, Tor; Irgens, Eirik J.

In: Management Learning, Vol. 44, No. 3, 07.2013, p. 253-266 .

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Keeping Things Mindfully on Track

T2 - Organizational Learning under Continuity

AU - Hernes, Tor

AU - Irgens, Eirik J.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - We take a critical look at the widespread assumption that organizational learning is associated with a mismatch between expectations and outcomes. While mismatch is central to studying organizational learning, we argue that continuity is equally important. Learning under continuity requires an investment of effort, mindfulness and preparedness for change, even if no perceptible change occurs. Although the organizational literature has to some extent dealt with learning under continuity, putting it more firmly on the organizational learning agenda is necessary. A central element of a more explicit focus on learning under continuity, we argue, is to take a temporal view of organizational learning that includes agency at organizational level. We discuss how, from a temporal view, learning under continuity entails the (1) assessment of present courses of action; (2) exploration of future courses of action; and (3) re-interpretation of past courses of action.

AB - We take a critical look at the widespread assumption that organizational learning is associated with a mismatch between expectations and outcomes. While mismatch is central to studying organizational learning, we argue that continuity is equally important. Learning under continuity requires an investment of effort, mindfulness and preparedness for change, even if no perceptible change occurs. Although the organizational literature has to some extent dealt with learning under continuity, putting it more firmly on the organizational learning agenda is necessary. A central element of a more explicit focus on learning under continuity, we argue, is to take a temporal view of organizational learning that includes agency at organizational level. We discuss how, from a temporal view, learning under continuity entails the (1) assessment of present courses of action; (2) exploration of future courses of action; and (3) re-interpretation of past courses of action.

KW - Agency

KW - Leadership

KW - Mindfulness

KW - Organizational learning

KW - Process view

KW - Temporality

U2 - 10.1177/1350507612445258

DO - 10.1177/1350507612445258

M3 - Journal article

VL - 44

SP - 253

EP - 266

JO - Management Learning

JF - Management Learning

SN - 1350-5076

IS - 3

ER -