Is the Open Method of Co-ordination Appropriate for Organising Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article addresses the question of the relevance of the most recent soft policy instrument of the EU, the open method of coordination (OMC), for organising actions at European level in politically sensitive areas. In addition to describing its origins and operational principles, we will compare its application to the areas of employment and social inclusion. Two hypotheses make up the structure of the text. The first is that the discourses produced in the framework of OMC in the areas of employment and social inclusion are broad enough to cater to the different welfare models, but that the changes to be made by the Member States to be in line with the European discourses differ considerably, depending on their welfare state family and their initial situation. The second is that the form of OMC is variable, depending on policy area. Our conclusions confirm both of these hypotheses.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Law Journal
Volume8
Issue number1
Number of pages22
ISSN1351-5993
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{72057e8e7bcc457e92c2575b191eb8c2,
title = "Is the Open Method of Co-ordination Appropriate for Organising Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas?",
abstract = "This article addresses the question of the relevance of the most recent soft policy instrument of the EU, the open method of coordination (OMC), for organising actions at European level in politically sensitive areas. In addition to describing its origins and operational principles, we will compare its application to the areas of employment and social inclusion. Two hypotheses make up the structure of the text. The first is that the discourses produced in the framework of OMC in the areas of employment and social inclusion are broad enough to cater to the different welfare models, but that the changes to be made by the Member States to be in line with the European discourses differ considerably, depending on their welfare state family and their initial situation. The second is that the form of OMC is variable, depending on policy area. Our conclusions confirm both of these hypotheses.",
author = "{de la Porte}, Caroline",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "European Law Journal",
issn = "1351-5993",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Is the Open Method of Co-ordination Appropriate for Organising Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas? / de la Porte, Caroline.

In: European Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the Open Method of Co-ordination Appropriate for Organising Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas?

AU - de la Porte, Caroline

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This article addresses the question of the relevance of the most recent soft policy instrument of the EU, the open method of coordination (OMC), for organising actions at European level in politically sensitive areas. In addition to describing its origins and operational principles, we will compare its application to the areas of employment and social inclusion. Two hypotheses make up the structure of the text. The first is that the discourses produced in the framework of OMC in the areas of employment and social inclusion are broad enough to cater to the different welfare models, but that the changes to be made by the Member States to be in line with the European discourses differ considerably, depending on their welfare state family and their initial situation. The second is that the form of OMC is variable, depending on policy area. Our conclusions confirm both of these hypotheses.

AB - This article addresses the question of the relevance of the most recent soft policy instrument of the EU, the open method of coordination (OMC), for organising actions at European level in politically sensitive areas. In addition to describing its origins and operational principles, we will compare its application to the areas of employment and social inclusion. Two hypotheses make up the structure of the text. The first is that the discourses produced in the framework of OMC in the areas of employment and social inclusion are broad enough to cater to the different welfare models, but that the changes to be made by the Member States to be in line with the European discourses differ considerably, depending on their welfare state family and their initial situation. The second is that the form of OMC is variable, depending on policy area. Our conclusions confirm both of these hypotheses.

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017756180

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

JO - European Law Journal

JF - European Law Journal

SN - 1351-5993

IS - 1

ER -