TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating the Structure and Meaning of Public Service Motivation across Populations
T2 - Developing an International Instrument and Addressing Issues of Measurement Invariance
AU - Kim, Sangmook
AU - Vandenabeele, Wouter
AU - Wright, Bradley E.
AU - Andersen, Lotte Bøgh
AU - Cerase, Francesco Paolo
AU - K. Christensen, Robert
AU - Desmarais, Céline
AU - Koumenta, Maria
AU - Leisink, Peter
AU - Liu, Bangcheng
AU - Palidauskaite, Jolanta
AU - Holm Pedersen, Lene
AU - Perry, James L.
AU - Ritz, Adrian
AU - Taylor, Jeannette
AU - De Vivo, Paola
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The growth in international research on public service motivation (PSM) raises a number of important questions about the degree to which the theory and research developed in one country can contribute to our understanding of PSM in other counties. To help address this issue, this study revisits the conceptual and operational definitions of PSM to address weaknesses previously noted in the literature. Although some important steps have been taken to both improve and internationalize the PSM scale, this work has been done incrementally. In contrast, this study takes a more systematic and comprehensive approach by combining the efforts of international PSM scholars to develop and then test a revised measurement instrument for PSM in 12 countries. Although the resulting four dimensional 16-item measure of PSM reported here provides a better theoretical and empirical foundation for the measurement of PSM, our results suggest that the exact meaning and scaling of PSM dimensions are likely to differ across cultures and languages. These results raise serious concerns regarding the ability to develop a single universal scale of PSM, or making direct comparisons of PSM across countries.
AB - The growth in international research on public service motivation (PSM) raises a number of important questions about the degree to which the theory and research developed in one country can contribute to our understanding of PSM in other counties. To help address this issue, this study revisits the conceptual and operational definitions of PSM to address weaknesses previously noted in the literature. Although some important steps have been taken to both improve and internationalize the PSM scale, this work has been done incrementally. In contrast, this study takes a more systematic and comprehensive approach by combining the efforts of international PSM scholars to develop and then test a revised measurement instrument for PSM in 12 countries. Although the resulting four dimensional 16-item measure of PSM reported here provides a better theoretical and empirical foundation for the measurement of PSM, our results suggest that the exact meaning and scaling of PSM dimensions are likely to differ across cultures and languages. These results raise serious concerns regarding the ability to develop a single universal scale of PSM, or making direct comparisons of PSM across countries.
U2 - 10.1093/jopart/mus027
DO - 10.1093/jopart/mus027
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1053-1858
VL - 23
SP - 79
EP - 102
JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
IS - 1
ER -