International Film Festivals for the Benefit for Whom?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ‘Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Volume2011
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)139-165
ISSN2000-1525
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Film Festivals
  • Late adopters
  • Legitimacy
  • Institutional Work

Cite this

@article{197288ab8380481da4b8722d9afdcb44,
title = "International Film Festivals for the Benefit for Whom?",
abstract = "Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ‘Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals.",
keywords = "Film Festivals, Late adopters, Legitimacy, Institutional Work",
author = "{Strandgaard Pedersen}, Jesper and Carmelo Mazza",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113139",
language = "English",
volume = "2011",
pages = "139--165",
journal = "Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research",
issn = "2000-1525",
publisher = "Link{\"o}ping University Electronic Press",
number = "3",

}

International Film Festivals for the Benefit for Whom? / Strandgaard Pedersen, Jesper; Mazza, Carmelo.

In: Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, Vol. 2011, No. 3, 2011, p. 139-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Film Festivals for the Benefit for Whom?

AU - Strandgaard Pedersen, Jesper

AU - Mazza, Carmelo

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ‘Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals.

AB - Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ‘Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals.

KW - Film Festivals

KW - Late adopters

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Institutional Work

U2 - 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113139

DO - 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113139

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2011

SP - 139

EP - 165

JO - Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research

JF - Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research

SN - 2000-1525

IS - 3

ER -