Inter-organizational Paradox Management: How National Business Systems Influence the Spillover of Paradox Management Practices in Global Value Chains

Stephanie Schrage, Andreas Rasche

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study discusses how and whether paradox management practices spill over between organizations along a global value chain. Based on case study evidence related to a global value chain from the footwear industry between Germany and China, we study how different actors coped with the paradoxical tension between providing living wages to workers and upholding financial performance. Our findings show: (a) that the German national business system created an institutional context in which the living wage paradox was evaluated in a proactive manner, while the Chinese national business system favored a defensive response and (b) that Chinese organizations framed a proposed paradox management practice (living wage audits) in a way that it lost its intended meaning. Based on this, we theorize a sensemaking model, which highlights that relevant sensemaking activities in the Chinese context were impeded and therefore did not reinforce the proactive framing of the paradox management practice.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2019
Number of pages44
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event35th EGOS Colloquium 2019: Enlightening the Future: The Challenge for Organizations - University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 4 Jul 20196 Jul 2019
Conference number: 35
https://www.egosnet.org/2019_edinburgh/colloquium

Conference

Conference35th EGOS Colloquium 2019
Number35
LocationUniversity of Edinburgh Business School
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period04/07/201906/07/2019
Internet address

Keywords

  • Paradox
  • National business systems
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Labor rights
  • Sensemaking

Cite this

@conference{9b7f38ba8f1747aab9284fc2349d3e81,
title = "Inter-organizational Paradox Management: How National Business Systems Influence the Spillover of Paradox Management Practices in Global Value Chains",
abstract = "This study discusses how and whether paradox management practices spill over between organizations along a global value chain. Based on case study evidence related to a global value chain from the footwear industry between Germany and China, we study how different actors coped with the paradoxical tension between providing living wages to workers and upholding financial performance. Our findings show: (a) that the German national business system created an institutional context in which the living wage paradox was evaluated in a proactive manner, while the Chinese national business system favored a defensive response and (b) that Chinese organizations framed a proposed paradox management practice (living wage audits) in a way that it lost its intended meaning. Based on this, we theorize a sensemaking model, which highlights that relevant sensemaking activities in the Chinese context were impeded and therefore did not reinforce the proactive framing of the paradox management practice.",
keywords = "Paradox, National business systems, Corporate social responsibility, Labor rights, Sensemaking, Paradox, National business systems, Corporate social responsibility, Labor rights, Sensemaking",
author = "Stephanie Schrage and Andreas Rasche",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 04-07-2019 Through 06-07-2019",
url = "https://www.egosnet.org/2019_edinburgh/colloquium",

}

Inter-organizational Paradox Management : How National Business Systems Influence the Spillover of Paradox Management Practices in Global Value Chains. / Schrage, Stephanie; Rasche, Andreas.

2019. Paper presented at 35th EGOS Colloquium 2019, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Inter-organizational Paradox Management

T2 - How National Business Systems Influence the Spillover of Paradox Management Practices in Global Value Chains

AU - Schrage, Stephanie

AU - Rasche, Andreas

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This study discusses how and whether paradox management practices spill over between organizations along a global value chain. Based on case study evidence related to a global value chain from the footwear industry between Germany and China, we study how different actors coped with the paradoxical tension between providing living wages to workers and upholding financial performance. Our findings show: (a) that the German national business system created an institutional context in which the living wage paradox was evaluated in a proactive manner, while the Chinese national business system favored a defensive response and (b) that Chinese organizations framed a proposed paradox management practice (living wage audits) in a way that it lost its intended meaning. Based on this, we theorize a sensemaking model, which highlights that relevant sensemaking activities in the Chinese context were impeded and therefore did not reinforce the proactive framing of the paradox management practice.

AB - This study discusses how and whether paradox management practices spill over between organizations along a global value chain. Based on case study evidence related to a global value chain from the footwear industry between Germany and China, we study how different actors coped with the paradoxical tension between providing living wages to workers and upholding financial performance. Our findings show: (a) that the German national business system created an institutional context in which the living wage paradox was evaluated in a proactive manner, while the Chinese national business system favored a defensive response and (b) that Chinese organizations framed a proposed paradox management practice (living wage audits) in a way that it lost its intended meaning. Based on this, we theorize a sensemaking model, which highlights that relevant sensemaking activities in the Chinese context were impeded and therefore did not reinforce the proactive framing of the paradox management practice.

KW - Paradox

KW - National business systems

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Labor rights

KW - Sensemaking

KW - Paradox

KW - National business systems

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Labor rights

KW - Sensemaking

M3 - Paper

ER -