Intellectual Failure and Ideological Success in Organization Studies: The Case of Transformational Leadership

Mats Alvesson, Dan Kärreman

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    1105 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article discusses the current self-confidence and apparent success—at least by market/popularity measures—of leadership studies (LS) in general and transformational leadership (TFL) in particular. An alternative interpretation is offered, suggesting that it is the ideological character of these approaches that account for their “success,” at least in quantitative terms. Their wide appeal needs to be understood against the background of the fragmentation in the field before the entrance of these much more popularly appealing, but theoretically questionable ideas which lack credible empirical support. The article concludes that the currently popular streams are strongly structured by ideology—drawing on hero and religious mythologies—and suggests some ways to reduce the ideological overtone and the resulting tendency to produce tautologies and biased results.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)139-152
    Number of pages14
    ISSN1056-4926
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • Leadership
    • Power and politics
    • Philosophy of science

    Cite this

    @article{bf92703a32b04fc09db252ec8fa64953,
    title = "Intellectual Failure and Ideological Success in Organization Studies: The Case of Transformational Leadership",
    abstract = "This article discusses the current self-confidence and apparent success—at least by market/popularity measures—of leadership studies (LS) in general and transformational leadership (TFL) in particular. An alternative interpretation is offered, suggesting that it is the ideological character of these approaches that account for their “success,” at least in quantitative terms. Their wide appeal needs to be understood against the background of the fragmentation in the field before the entrance of these much more popularly appealing, but theoretically questionable ideas which lack credible empirical support. The article concludes that the currently popular streams are strongly structured by ideology—drawing on hero and religious mythologies—and suggests some ways to reduce the ideological overtone and the resulting tendency to produce tautologies and biased results.",
    keywords = "Leadership, Power and politics, Philosophy of science, Leadership, Power and politics, Philosophy of science",
    author = "Mats Alvesson and Dan K{\"a}rreman",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1177/1056492615589974",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "139--152",
    journal = "Journal of Management Inquiry",
    issn = "1056-4926",
    publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Intellectual Failure and Ideological Success in Organization Studies : The Case of Transformational Leadership. / Alvesson, Mats; Kärreman, Dan.

    In: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2016, p. 139-152.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Intellectual Failure and Ideological Success in Organization Studies

    T2 - The Case of Transformational Leadership

    AU - Alvesson, Mats

    AU - Kärreman, Dan

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This article discusses the current self-confidence and apparent success—at least by market/popularity measures—of leadership studies (LS) in general and transformational leadership (TFL) in particular. An alternative interpretation is offered, suggesting that it is the ideological character of these approaches that account for their “success,” at least in quantitative terms. Their wide appeal needs to be understood against the background of the fragmentation in the field before the entrance of these much more popularly appealing, but theoretically questionable ideas which lack credible empirical support. The article concludes that the currently popular streams are strongly structured by ideology—drawing on hero and religious mythologies—and suggests some ways to reduce the ideological overtone and the resulting tendency to produce tautologies and biased results.

    AB - This article discusses the current self-confidence and apparent success—at least by market/popularity measures—of leadership studies (LS) in general and transformational leadership (TFL) in particular. An alternative interpretation is offered, suggesting that it is the ideological character of these approaches that account for their “success,” at least in quantitative terms. Their wide appeal needs to be understood against the background of the fragmentation in the field before the entrance of these much more popularly appealing, but theoretically questionable ideas which lack credible empirical support. The article concludes that the currently popular streams are strongly structured by ideology—drawing on hero and religious mythologies—and suggests some ways to reduce the ideological overtone and the resulting tendency to produce tautologies and biased results.

    KW - Leadership

    KW - Power and politics

    KW - Philosophy of science

    KW - Leadership

    KW - Power and politics

    KW - Philosophy of science

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921420528

    U2 - 10.1177/1056492615589974

    DO - 10.1177/1056492615589974

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 25

    SP - 139

    EP - 152

    JO - Journal of Management Inquiry

    JF - Journal of Management Inquiry

    SN - 1056-4926

    IS - 2

    ER -