Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)

Anoush Margaryan, Manuela Bianco, Allison Littlejohn

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We present an analysis of instructional design quality of 76 randomly selected Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). The quality of MOOCs was determined from first principles of instruction, using a course survey instrument. Two types of MOOCs (xMOOCs and cMOOCs) were analysed and their instructional design quality was assessed and compared. We found that the majority of MOOCs scored poorly on most instructional design principles. However, most MOOCs scored highly on organisation and presentation of course material. The results indicate that although most MOOCs are well-packaged, their instructional design quality is low. We outline implications for practice and ideas for future research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalComputers & Education
Volume80
Pages (from-to)77-83
Number of pages7
ISSN0360-1315
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Massive Online Open Courses
  • Distributed learning environments
  • Evaluation methodologies
  • Lifelong learning
  • Pedagogical issues

Cite this

Margaryan, Anoush ; Bianco, Manuela ; Littlejohn, Allison. / Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). In: Computers & Education. 2015 ; Vol. 80. pp. 77-83.
@article{849e622a4a3645ddb9babef991310d16,
title = "Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)",
abstract = "We present an analysis of instructional design quality of 76 randomly selected Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). The quality of MOOCs was determined from first principles of instruction, using a course survey instrument. Two types of MOOCs (xMOOCs and cMOOCs) were analysed and their instructional design quality was assessed and compared. We found that the majority of MOOCs scored poorly on most instructional design principles. However, most MOOCs scored highly on organisation and presentation of course material. The results indicate that although most MOOCs are well-packaged, their instructional design quality is low. We outline implications for practice and ideas for future research.",
keywords = "Massive Online Open Courses, Distributed learning environments, Evaluation methodologies, Lifelong learning, Pedagogical issues, Massive Online Open Courses, Distributed learning environments, Evaluation methodologies, Lifelong learning, Pedagogical issues",
author = "Anoush Margaryan and Manuela Bianco and Allison Littlejohn",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "77--83",
journal = "Computers & Education",
issn = "0360-1315",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). / Margaryan, Anoush ; Bianco, Manuela; Littlejohn, Allison.

In: Computers & Education, Vol. 80, 01.2015, p. 77-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)

AU - Margaryan, Anoush

AU - Bianco, Manuela

AU - Littlejohn, Allison

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - We present an analysis of instructional design quality of 76 randomly selected Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). The quality of MOOCs was determined from first principles of instruction, using a course survey instrument. Two types of MOOCs (xMOOCs and cMOOCs) were analysed and their instructional design quality was assessed and compared. We found that the majority of MOOCs scored poorly on most instructional design principles. However, most MOOCs scored highly on organisation and presentation of course material. The results indicate that although most MOOCs are well-packaged, their instructional design quality is low. We outline implications for practice and ideas for future research.

AB - We present an analysis of instructional design quality of 76 randomly selected Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). The quality of MOOCs was determined from first principles of instruction, using a course survey instrument. Two types of MOOCs (xMOOCs and cMOOCs) were analysed and their instructional design quality was assessed and compared. We found that the majority of MOOCs scored poorly on most instructional design principles. However, most MOOCs scored highly on organisation and presentation of course material. The results indicate that although most MOOCs are well-packaged, their instructional design quality is low. We outline implications for practice and ideas for future research.

KW - Massive Online Open Courses

KW - Distributed learning environments

KW - Evaluation methodologies

KW - Lifelong learning

KW - Pedagogical issues

KW - Massive Online Open Courses

KW - Distributed learning environments

KW - Evaluation methodologies

KW - Lifelong learning

KW - Pedagogical issues

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925520664&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 80

SP - 77

EP - 83

JO - Computers & Education

JF - Computers & Education

SN - 0360-1315

ER -