Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States

John L. Campbell, Ove K. Pedersen

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    Abstract

    Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.
    Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.
    LanguageEnglish
    Place of PublicationKøbenhavn
    PublisherDepartment of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School
    Number of pages33
    ISBN (Print)8791690234
    StatePublished - 2005

    Keywords

      Cite this

      Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2005). Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States. København: Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School.
      Campbell, John L. ; Pedersen, Ove K./ Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy : Denmark and the United States. København : Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, 2005.
      @techreport{72b560e0dd3b11db84f6000ea68e967b,
      title = "Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States",
      abstract = "Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.",
      keywords = "International konkurrenceevne, {\O}konomisk sociologi",
      author = "Campbell, {John L.} and Pedersen, {Ove K.}",
      year = "2005",
      language = "English",
      isbn = "8791690234",
      publisher = "Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School",
      type = "WorkingPaper",
      institution = "Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School",

      }

      Campbell, JL & Pedersen, OK 2005 'Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States' Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, København.

      Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy : Denmark and the United States. / Campbell, John L.; Pedersen, Ove K.

      København : Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, 2005.

      Research output: Working paperResearch

      TY - UNPB

      T1 - Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy

      T2 - Denmark and the United States

      AU - Campbell,John L.

      AU - Pedersen,Ove K.

      PY - 2005

      Y1 - 2005

      N2 - Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.

      AB - Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.

      KW - International konkurrenceevne

      KW - Økonomisk sociologi

      M3 - Working paper

      SN - 8791690234

      BT - Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy

      PB - Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School

      CY - København

      ER -

      Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States. København: Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School. 2005.