Insider or Outsider?

Exploring the Fluidity of the Roles Through Social Identity Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the fluidity of the fieldwork roles “insider” and “outsider.” The paper aims to move the discussion of insiders from an a priori categorized status and contribute to the literary insider–outsider debate by unfolding the micro process of how the role of an insider is shaped in situ. Grounded in empirical examples, the paper illustrates how the researcher’s role is shaped through interactions with organizational members and by context.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on an ethnographic study in an IT department of a Nordic bank and draws on empirical material generated through a combination of data: shadowing, interviews, observations and documents. Excerpts from fieldnotes are included to invite the reader into “the scenes” played out in the field and are analyzed in order to illustrate the shaping of roles in situ.
Findings – The study finds that, independent of the researcher’s role as sponsored by the organization, the interactions with organizational members and context determine whether the researcher is assigned a role as insider or outsider, or even both within the same context.
Originality/value – The paper contributes with a new discussion of how the roles of insiders and outsiders are fluid by discussing the shaping of the roles in situ. By drawing on relational identity theories, the paper illustrates how interactions and context influence the researcher’s role, grounded in empirical examples. In addition, the paper discusses what the assigned roles enable and constrain for the ethnographer in that
particular situation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Organizational Ethnography
Volume8
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)159-170
Number of pages12
ISSN2046-6749
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online.

Keywords

  • Social identity theory
  • Outsider
  • Fieldwork
  • Roles
  • Insider
  • Sponsored research

Cite this

@article{dd4c6e64790d4c6fbd72f28cb0e820c6,
title = "Insider or Outsider?: Exploring the Fluidity of the Roles Through Social Identity Theory",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the fluidity of the fieldwork roles “insider” and “outsider.” The paper aims to move the discussion of insiders from an a priori categorized status and contribute to the literary insider–outsider debate by unfolding the micro process of how the role of an insider is shaped in situ. Grounded in empirical examples, the paper illustrates how the researcher’s role is shaped through interactions with organizational members and by context.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on an ethnographic study in an IT department of a Nordic bank and draws on empirical material generated through a combination of data: shadowing, interviews, observations and documents. Excerpts from fieldnotes are included to invite the reader into “the scenes” played out in the field and are analyzed in order to illustrate the shaping of roles in situ.Findings – The study finds that, independent of the researcher’s role as sponsored by the organization, the interactions with organizational members and context determine whether the researcher is assigned a role as insider or outsider, or even both within the same context.Originality/value – The paper contributes with a new discussion of how the roles of insiders and outsiders are fluid by discussing the shaping of the roles in situ. By drawing on relational identity theories, the paper illustrates how interactions and context influence the researcher’s role, grounded in empirical examples. In addition, the paper discusses what the assigned roles enable and constrain for the ethnographer in thatparticular situation.",
keywords = "Social identity theory, Outsider, Fieldworks, Roles, Indsider, Sponsored research, Social identity theory, Outsider, Fieldwork, Roles, Insider, Sponsored research",
author = "Signe Bruskin",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1108/JOE-09-2017-0039",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "159--170",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Ethnography",
issn = "2046-6749",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "2",

}

Insider or Outsider? Exploring the Fluidity of the Roles Through Social Identity Theory. / Bruskin, Signe.

In: Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2018, p. 159-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insider or Outsider?

T2 - Exploring the Fluidity of the Roles Through Social Identity Theory

AU - Bruskin, Signe

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the fluidity of the fieldwork roles “insider” and “outsider.” The paper aims to move the discussion of insiders from an a priori categorized status and contribute to the literary insider–outsider debate by unfolding the micro process of how the role of an insider is shaped in situ. Grounded in empirical examples, the paper illustrates how the researcher’s role is shaped through interactions with organizational members and by context.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on an ethnographic study in an IT department of a Nordic bank and draws on empirical material generated through a combination of data: shadowing, interviews, observations and documents. Excerpts from fieldnotes are included to invite the reader into “the scenes” played out in the field and are analyzed in order to illustrate the shaping of roles in situ.Findings – The study finds that, independent of the researcher’s role as sponsored by the organization, the interactions with organizational members and context determine whether the researcher is assigned a role as insider or outsider, or even both within the same context.Originality/value – The paper contributes with a new discussion of how the roles of insiders and outsiders are fluid by discussing the shaping of the roles in situ. By drawing on relational identity theories, the paper illustrates how interactions and context influence the researcher’s role, grounded in empirical examples. In addition, the paper discusses what the assigned roles enable and constrain for the ethnographer in thatparticular situation.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the fluidity of the fieldwork roles “insider” and “outsider.” The paper aims to move the discussion of insiders from an a priori categorized status and contribute to the literary insider–outsider debate by unfolding the micro process of how the role of an insider is shaped in situ. Grounded in empirical examples, the paper illustrates how the researcher’s role is shaped through interactions with organizational members and by context.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on an ethnographic study in an IT department of a Nordic bank and draws on empirical material generated through a combination of data: shadowing, interviews, observations and documents. Excerpts from fieldnotes are included to invite the reader into “the scenes” played out in the field and are analyzed in order to illustrate the shaping of roles in situ.Findings – The study finds that, independent of the researcher’s role as sponsored by the organization, the interactions with organizational members and context determine whether the researcher is assigned a role as insider or outsider, or even both within the same context.Originality/value – The paper contributes with a new discussion of how the roles of insiders and outsiders are fluid by discussing the shaping of the roles in situ. By drawing on relational identity theories, the paper illustrates how interactions and context influence the researcher’s role, grounded in empirical examples. In addition, the paper discusses what the assigned roles enable and constrain for the ethnographer in thatparticular situation.

KW - Social identity theory

KW - Outsider

KW - Fieldworks

KW - Roles

KW - Indsider

KW - Sponsored research

KW - Social identity theory

KW - Outsider

KW - Fieldwork

KW - Roles

KW - Insider

KW - Sponsored research

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=3280000000000364&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/JOE-09-2017-0039

DO - 10.1108/JOE-09-2017-0039

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 159

EP - 170

JO - Journal of Organizational Ethnography

JF - Journal of Organizational Ethnography

SN - 2046-6749

IS - 2

ER -