Industrial Property or Artistic Property?

Design, Intellectual Property Law and the PH Lamp

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The status of design under intellectual property law is unresolved in a number of ways; for more than three centuries design has vacillated in between legal categories. Notably, many current problems in the protection of intellectual property in design were already apparent by the mid-nineteenth century. Thus, in the first part of this article, the origins of and legal responses to problems that still complicate design-related intellectual property law are traced. The specific focus is on British law, which was a forerunner for other national laws on design protection. The second part of the article concentrates on Danish law and on the PH lamp, created in the 1920s by the Danish designer Poul Henningsen. An ‘intellectual property biography’ of the PH lamp serves to illustrate the unstable status of design under intellectual property law. Poul Henningsen relied on patent law as well as copyright law for protection against rivals. Hence the lamp has been defined, respectively, as both ‘industrial property’ and ‘artistic property’; as an invention and as a work of art. The twofold character of the lamp in law may be linked to an unresolved relationship, in modern design in particular, between aesthetics and utility.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Design History
Volume30
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)408–419
ISSN0952-4649
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{8d8af732cdfd43c88b7171133a22ba21,
title = "Industrial Property or Artistic Property?: Design, Intellectual Property Law and the PH Lamp",
abstract = "The status of design under intellectual property law is unresolved in a number of ways; for more than three centuries design has vacillated in between legal categories. Notably, many current problems in the protection of intellectual property in design were already apparent by the mid-nineteenth century. Thus, in the first part of this article, the origins of and legal responses to problems that still complicate design-related intellectual property law are traced. The specific focus is on British law, which was a forerunner for other national laws on design protection. The second part of the article concentrates on Danish law and on the PH lamp, created in the 1920s by the Danish designer Poul Henningsen. An ‘intellectual property biography’ of the PH lamp serves to illustrate the unstable status of design under intellectual property law. Poul Henningsen relied on patent law as well as copyright law for protection against rivals. Hence the lamp has been defined, respectively, as both ‘industrial property’ and ‘artistic property’; as an invention and as a work of art. The twofold character of the lamp in law may be linked to an unresolved relationship, in modern design in particular, between aesthetics and utility.",
author = "Stina Teilmann-Lock",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1093/jdh/epw020",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "408–419",
journal = "Journal of Design History",
issn = "0952-4649",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Industrial Property or Artistic Property? Design, Intellectual Property Law and the PH Lamp. / Teilmann-Lock, Stina.

In: Journal of Design History, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2017, p. 408–419.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industrial Property or Artistic Property?

T2 - Design, Intellectual Property Law and the PH Lamp

AU - Teilmann-Lock, Stina

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The status of design under intellectual property law is unresolved in a number of ways; for more than three centuries design has vacillated in between legal categories. Notably, many current problems in the protection of intellectual property in design were already apparent by the mid-nineteenth century. Thus, in the first part of this article, the origins of and legal responses to problems that still complicate design-related intellectual property law are traced. The specific focus is on British law, which was a forerunner for other national laws on design protection. The second part of the article concentrates on Danish law and on the PH lamp, created in the 1920s by the Danish designer Poul Henningsen. An ‘intellectual property biography’ of the PH lamp serves to illustrate the unstable status of design under intellectual property law. Poul Henningsen relied on patent law as well as copyright law for protection against rivals. Hence the lamp has been defined, respectively, as both ‘industrial property’ and ‘artistic property’; as an invention and as a work of art. The twofold character of the lamp in law may be linked to an unresolved relationship, in modern design in particular, between aesthetics and utility.

AB - The status of design under intellectual property law is unresolved in a number of ways; for more than three centuries design has vacillated in between legal categories. Notably, many current problems in the protection of intellectual property in design were already apparent by the mid-nineteenth century. Thus, in the first part of this article, the origins of and legal responses to problems that still complicate design-related intellectual property law are traced. The specific focus is on British law, which was a forerunner for other national laws on design protection. The second part of the article concentrates on Danish law and on the PH lamp, created in the 1920s by the Danish designer Poul Henningsen. An ‘intellectual property biography’ of the PH lamp serves to illustrate the unstable status of design under intellectual property law. Poul Henningsen relied on patent law as well as copyright law for protection against rivals. Hence the lamp has been defined, respectively, as both ‘industrial property’ and ‘artistic property’; as an invention and as a work of art. The twofold character of the lamp in law may be linked to an unresolved relationship, in modern design in particular, between aesthetics and utility.

U2 - 10.1093/jdh/epw020

DO - 10.1093/jdh/epw020

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 408

EP - 419

JO - Journal of Design History

JF - Journal of Design History

SN - 0952-4649

IS - 4

ER -