Individual Responses to Multiple Logics in Hybrid Organizing

The Role of Structural Position

Virginie Svenningsen-Berthélem, Eva Boxenbaum, Davide Ravasi

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article investigates how employees respond to hybrid organizing, that is, organizational settings that are characterized by multiple institutional logics. We examine individuals’ propensity to either hybridize or compartmentalize multiple logics in such settings. Our empirical setting is that of a French energy corporation that engages in research partnerships with multiple public and private actors to further energy transition. Their hybrid organizing is informed by a logic of science and a logic of market, which tend to conflict with one another. Our findings suggest that three types of capital—scientific, social and cultural—shape individual responses to multiple logics. In addition, we found that individuals gain capital from three elements of their structural position: a) their professional training, b) the type of organizational position they occupy, and c) the length and the variety of their work experience in a hybrid organizational setting. These insights shed new light on how individuals respond to multiple logics, insight that can be useful for addressing the tensions that arise in hybrid organizing and that impact on organizational performance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalM@n@gement
Volume21
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1306-1328
Number of pages23
ISSN1286-4692
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Hybrid organizing
  • Institutional Logics
  • Capital
  • Propensity
  • Energy transition

Cite this

Svenningsen-Berthélem, Virginie ; Boxenbaum, Eva ; Ravasi, Davide. / Individual Responses to Multiple Logics in Hybrid Organizing : The Role of Structural Position. In: M@n@gement. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 1306-1328.
@article{c4dc6a754f2f4c73a4ca6e3bd7763f5a,
title = "Individual Responses to Multiple Logics in Hybrid Organizing: The Role of Structural Position",
abstract = "This article investigates how employees respond to hybrid organizing, that is, organizational settings that are characterized by multiple institutional logics. We examine individuals’ propensity to either hybridize or compartmentalize multiple logics in such settings. Our empirical setting is that of a French energy corporation that engages in research partnerships with multiple public and private actors to further energy transition. Their hybrid organizing is informed by a logic of science and a logic of market, which tend to conflict with one another. Our findings suggest that three types of capital—scientific, social and cultural—shape individual responses to multiple logics. In addition, we found that individuals gain capital from three elements of their structural position: a) their professional training, b) the type of organizational position they occupy, and c) the length and the variety of their work experience in a hybrid organizational setting. These insights shed new light on how individuals respond to multiple logics, insight that can be useful for addressing the tensions that arise in hybrid organizing and that impact on organizational performance.",
keywords = "Hybrid organizing, Institutional Logics, Capital, Propensity, Energy transition, Hybrid organizing, Institutional logics, Capital, Propensity, Energy transition",
author = "Virginie Svenningsen-Berth{\'e}lem and Eva Boxenbaum and Davide Ravasi",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1306--1328",
journal = "M@n@gement",
issn = "1286-4692",
publisher = "Association Internationale de Management Strategique (AIMS)",
number = "4",

}

Svenningsen-Berthélem, V, Boxenbaum, E & Ravasi, D 2018, 'Individual Responses to Multiple Logics in Hybrid Organizing: The Role of Structural Position', M@n@gement, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1306-1328.

Individual Responses to Multiple Logics in Hybrid Organizing : The Role of Structural Position. / Svenningsen-Berthélem, Virginie; Boxenbaum, Eva; Ravasi, Davide.

In: M@n@gement, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2018, p. 1306-1328.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual Responses to Multiple Logics in Hybrid Organizing

T2 - The Role of Structural Position

AU - Svenningsen-Berthélem, Virginie

AU - Boxenbaum, Eva

AU - Ravasi, Davide

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article investigates how employees respond to hybrid organizing, that is, organizational settings that are characterized by multiple institutional logics. We examine individuals’ propensity to either hybridize or compartmentalize multiple logics in such settings. Our empirical setting is that of a French energy corporation that engages in research partnerships with multiple public and private actors to further energy transition. Their hybrid organizing is informed by a logic of science and a logic of market, which tend to conflict with one another. Our findings suggest that three types of capital—scientific, social and cultural—shape individual responses to multiple logics. In addition, we found that individuals gain capital from three elements of their structural position: a) their professional training, b) the type of organizational position they occupy, and c) the length and the variety of their work experience in a hybrid organizational setting. These insights shed new light on how individuals respond to multiple logics, insight that can be useful for addressing the tensions that arise in hybrid organizing and that impact on organizational performance.

AB - This article investigates how employees respond to hybrid organizing, that is, organizational settings that are characterized by multiple institutional logics. We examine individuals’ propensity to either hybridize or compartmentalize multiple logics in such settings. Our empirical setting is that of a French energy corporation that engages in research partnerships with multiple public and private actors to further energy transition. Their hybrid organizing is informed by a logic of science and a logic of market, which tend to conflict with one another. Our findings suggest that three types of capital—scientific, social and cultural—shape individual responses to multiple logics. In addition, we found that individuals gain capital from three elements of their structural position: a) their professional training, b) the type of organizational position they occupy, and c) the length and the variety of their work experience in a hybrid organizational setting. These insights shed new light on how individuals respond to multiple logics, insight that can be useful for addressing the tensions that arise in hybrid organizing and that impact on organizational performance.

KW - Hybrid organizing

KW - Institutional Logics

KW - Capital

KW - Propensity

KW - Energy transition

KW - Hybrid organizing

KW - Institutional logics

KW - Capital

KW - Propensity

KW - Energy transition

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000753291&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 1306

EP - 1328

JO - M@n@gement

JF - M@n@gement

SN - 1286-4692

IS - 4

ER -