In Good Company

The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists

Valentina Tartari, Markus Perkmann, Ammon Salter

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    75 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Previous research on academic entrepreneurship and engagement with industry has found that the behaviour of academics is influenced by their local social context. However, we know little about the mechanisms that produce this effect. We argue that academic scientists’ industry engagement is influenced significantly by the behaviour of their peers, that is, the behaviour of colleagues of similar seniority. Using insights from social psychology, we hypothesize that these peer effects are produced by the mechanism of social comparison. In an analysis of data from multiple sources for 1370 UK academic scientists and engineers, we find that peer effects are stronger for early career individuals and weaker for star scientists, suggesting the incidence of social comparison. We argue that individuals look to their immediate peers for inspiration, because they view them as an important reference group and use them as a benchmark for their own ambitions and behaviours. Our findings have important implications for how universities may encourage scientists’ behaviours by paying attention to local work contexts.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalResearch Policy
    Volume23
    Issue number7
    Pages (from-to)1189-1203
    ISSN0048-7333
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • University–industry relations
    • Academic engagement
    • Commercialization
    • Scientists
    • Peer effects

    Cite this

    Tartari, Valentina ; Perkmann, Markus ; Salter, Ammon. / In Good Company : The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists. In: Research Policy. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 7. pp. 1189-1203.
    @article{2425fccaf29041d8bd2ca1a89396bf97,
    title = "In Good Company: The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists",
    abstract = "Previous research on academic entrepreneurship and engagement with industry has found that the behaviour of academics is influenced by their local social context. However, we know little about the mechanisms that produce this effect. We argue that academic scientists’ industry engagement is influenced significantly by the behaviour of their peers, that is, the behaviour of colleagues of similar seniority. Using insights from social psychology, we hypothesize that these peer effects are produced by the mechanism of social comparison. In an analysis of data from multiple sources for 1370 UK academic scientists and engineers, we find that peer effects are stronger for early career individuals and weaker for star scientists, suggesting the incidence of social comparison. We argue that individuals look to their immediate peers for inspiration, because they view them as an important reference group and use them as a benchmark for their own ambitions and behaviours. Our findings have important implications for how universities may encourage scientists’ behaviours by paying attention to local work contexts.",
    keywords = "University–industry relations, Academic engagement, Commercialization, Scientists, Peer effects",
    author = "Valentina Tartari and Markus Perkmann and Ammon Salter",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "1189--1203",
    journal = "Research Policy",
    issn = "0048-7333",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "7",

    }

    In Good Company : The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists. / Tartari, Valentina; Perkmann, Markus; Salter, Ammon.

    In: Research Policy, Vol. 23, No. 7, 2014, p. 1189-1203.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - In Good Company

    T2 - The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists

    AU - Tartari, Valentina

    AU - Perkmann, Markus

    AU - Salter, Ammon

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Previous research on academic entrepreneurship and engagement with industry has found that the behaviour of academics is influenced by their local social context. However, we know little about the mechanisms that produce this effect. We argue that academic scientists’ industry engagement is influenced significantly by the behaviour of their peers, that is, the behaviour of colleagues of similar seniority. Using insights from social psychology, we hypothesize that these peer effects are produced by the mechanism of social comparison. In an analysis of data from multiple sources for 1370 UK academic scientists and engineers, we find that peer effects are stronger for early career individuals and weaker for star scientists, suggesting the incidence of social comparison. We argue that individuals look to their immediate peers for inspiration, because they view them as an important reference group and use them as a benchmark for their own ambitions and behaviours. Our findings have important implications for how universities may encourage scientists’ behaviours by paying attention to local work contexts.

    AB - Previous research on academic entrepreneurship and engagement with industry has found that the behaviour of academics is influenced by their local social context. However, we know little about the mechanisms that produce this effect. We argue that academic scientists’ industry engagement is influenced significantly by the behaviour of their peers, that is, the behaviour of colleagues of similar seniority. Using insights from social psychology, we hypothesize that these peer effects are produced by the mechanism of social comparison. In an analysis of data from multiple sources for 1370 UK academic scientists and engineers, we find that peer effects are stronger for early career individuals and weaker for star scientists, suggesting the incidence of social comparison. We argue that individuals look to their immediate peers for inspiration, because they view them as an important reference group and use them as a benchmark for their own ambitions and behaviours. Our findings have important implications for how universities may encourage scientists’ behaviours by paying attention to local work contexts.

    KW - University–industry relations

    KW - Academic engagement

    KW - Commercialization

    KW - Scientists

    KW - Peer effects

    U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 23

    SP - 1189

    EP - 1203

    JO - Research Policy

    JF - Research Policy

    SN - 0048-7333

    IS - 7

    ER -