Improving Climate Change Mitigation Analysis: A Framework for Examining Feasibility

Kristian S. Nielsen*, Paul C. Stern, Thomas Dietz, Jonathan M. Gilligan, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Maria J. Figueroa, Carl Folke, Wencke Gwozdz, Diana Ivanova, Lucia A. Reisch, Michael P. Vandenbergh, Kimberly S. Wolske, Richard Wood

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

79 Downloads (Pure)


Limiting global warming to 2°C or less compared with pre-industrial temperatures will require unprecedented rates of decarbonization globally. The scale and scope of transformational change required across sectors and actors in society raises critical questions of feasibility. Much of the literature on mitigation pathways addresses technological and economic aspects of feasibility, but overlooks the behavioral, cultural, and social factors that affect theoretical and practical mitigation pathways. We present a tripartite framework that “unpacks” the concept of mitigation pathways by distinguishing three factors that together determine actual mitigation: technical potential, initiative feasibility, and behavioral plasticity. The framework aims to integrate and streamline heterogeneous disciplinary research traditions toward a more comprehensive and transparent approach that will facilitate learning across disciplines and enable mitigation pathways to more fully reflect available knowledge. We offer three suggestions for integrating the tripartite framework into current research on climate change mitigation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOne Earth
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)325-336
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2020


  • Climate change mitigation
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Practical feasibility

Cite this