Imperial Governance

Governing Inwards or Outwards?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This article presents an analysis of the European Union and of the integration process using the concept of empire. It also offers a critical reflexion on the use of the concept of empire to analyse contemporary polities. It argues that many scholars of politics have a biased understanding of this concept, which is ‘tailored’ to analyse only one type of empire, the colonial empire, and to disregard the existence of another type of empire. To escape this trap, the article suggests the use of two concepts, ‘inwards imperial governance’ and ‘outwards imperial governance’. These concepts make it possible to account for different types of empire in the past as well as contemporary polities. They also help shed a different light on the EU’s empirehood and its evolution over time. In its concluding remarks, the article suggests the potential usefulness of these concepts for the analysis of other contemporary cases.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalGeopolitics
    Volume20
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)814-835
    Number of pages22
    ISSN1465-0045
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Cite this

    @article{fa5a2c5ce77641eca3cce7ee5a6186b4,
    title = "Imperial Governance: Governing Inwards or Outwards?",
    abstract = "This article presents an analysis of the European Union and of the integration process using the concept of empire. It also offers a critical reflexion on the use of the concept of empire to analyse contemporary polities. It argues that many scholars of politics have a biased understanding of this concept, which is ‘tailored’ to analyse only one type of empire, the colonial empire, and to disregard the existence of another type of empire. To escape this trap, the article suggests the use of two concepts, ‘inwards imperial governance’ and ‘outwards imperial governance’. These concepts make it possible to account for different types of empire in the past as well as contemporary polities. They also help shed a different light on the EU’s empirehood and its evolution over time. In its concluding remarks, the article suggests the potential usefulness of these concepts for the analysis of other contemporary cases.",
    author = "Magali Gravier",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/14650045.2015.1065485",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "814--835",
    journal = "Geopolitics",
    issn = "1465-0045",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "4",

    }

    Imperial Governance : Governing Inwards or Outwards? / Gravier, Magali.

    In: Geopolitics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2015, p. 814-835.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Imperial Governance

    T2 - Governing Inwards or Outwards?

    AU - Gravier, Magali

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - This article presents an analysis of the European Union and of the integration process using the concept of empire. It also offers a critical reflexion on the use of the concept of empire to analyse contemporary polities. It argues that many scholars of politics have a biased understanding of this concept, which is ‘tailored’ to analyse only one type of empire, the colonial empire, and to disregard the existence of another type of empire. To escape this trap, the article suggests the use of two concepts, ‘inwards imperial governance’ and ‘outwards imperial governance’. These concepts make it possible to account for different types of empire in the past as well as contemporary polities. They also help shed a different light on the EU’s empirehood and its evolution over time. In its concluding remarks, the article suggests the potential usefulness of these concepts for the analysis of other contemporary cases.

    AB - This article presents an analysis of the European Union and of the integration process using the concept of empire. It also offers a critical reflexion on the use of the concept of empire to analyse contemporary polities. It argues that many scholars of politics have a biased understanding of this concept, which is ‘tailored’ to analyse only one type of empire, the colonial empire, and to disregard the existence of another type of empire. To escape this trap, the article suggests the use of two concepts, ‘inwards imperial governance’ and ‘outwards imperial governance’. These concepts make it possible to account for different types of empire in the past as well as contemporary polities. They also help shed a different light on the EU’s empirehood and its evolution over time. In its concluding remarks, the article suggests the potential usefulness of these concepts for the analysis of other contemporary cases.

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978984253576&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1080/14650045.2015.1065485

    DO - 10.1080/14650045.2015.1065485

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 20

    SP - 814

    EP - 835

    JO - Geopolitics

    JF - Geopolitics

    SN - 1465-0045

    IS - 4

    ER -