If Practice Makes Perfect, Where do we Stand?

Dennis F. Galletta, Niels Bjørn-Andersen, Dorothy E. Leidner, M. Lynne Markus, Ephraim R. McLean, Detmar Straub, James Wetherbe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Practitioners have played an important role in the information system (IS) field’s development since its beginnings. In the 1970s, IS researchers’ integration with practitioners was high with Society for Information Management members receiving copies of the MIS Quarterly, practitioners funding the ICIS Doctoral Consortium, and submissions receiving at least one practitioner review. Today, however, the integration between practitioners and researchers appears more distant. Given that almost 50 years have passed since the field’s development, we believe that we need to reflect on the past, present, and future relationship between IS research and IS practice. Has the distance between academics and practitioners become too great? Is our relevance too low to expect practitioners to join AIS and attend our conferences? How might we increase the integration? At a panel at ICIS 2018, several panelists provided position statements about those issues.
Original languageEnglish
Article number3
JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
Volume45
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)39–64
Number of pages26
ISSN1529-3181
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Research
  • Practice
  • Integration
  • Relevance
  • Relevance vs. rigor

Cite this

Galletta, D. F., Bjørn-Andersen, N., Leidner, D. E., Markus, M. L., McLean, E. R., Straub, D., & Wetherbe, J. (2019). If Practice Makes Perfect, Where do we Stand? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 45(1), 39–64. [3]. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04503
Galletta, Dennis F. ; Bjørn-Andersen, Niels ; Leidner, Dorothy E. ; Markus, M. Lynne ; McLean, Ephraim R. ; Straub, Detmar ; Wetherbe, James. / If Practice Makes Perfect, Where do we Stand?. In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2019 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 39–64.
@article{0f4bc0029e7e4d60b795729068fb61f7,
title = "If Practice Makes Perfect, Where do we Stand?",
abstract = "Practitioners have played an important role in the information system (IS) field’s development since its beginnings. In the 1970s, IS researchers’ integration with practitioners was high with Society for Information Management members receiving copies of the MIS Quarterly, practitioners funding the ICIS Doctoral Consortium, and submissions receiving at least one practitioner review. Today, however, the integration between practitioners and researchers appears more distant. Given that almost 50 years have passed since the field’s development, we believe that we need to reflect on the past, present, and future relationship between IS research and IS practice. Has the distance between academics and practitioners become too great? Is our relevance too low to expect practitioners to join AIS and attend our conferences? How might we increase the integration? At a panel at ICIS 2018, several panelists provided position statements about those issues.",
keywords = "Research, Practice, Integration, Relevance, Relevance vs. rigor, Research, Practice, Integration, Relevance, Relevance vs. rigor",
author = "Galletta, {Dennis F.} and Niels Bj{\o}rn-Andersen and Leidner, {Dorothy E.} and Markus, {M. Lynne} and McLean, {Ephraim R.} and Detmar Straub and James Wetherbe",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.17705/1CAIS.04503",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "39–64",
journal = "Communications of the Association for Information Systems",
issn = "1529-3181",
publisher = "Association for Information Systems",
number = "1",

}

Galletta, DF, Bjørn-Andersen, N, Leidner, DE, Markus, ML, McLean, ER, Straub, D & Wetherbe, J 2019, 'If Practice Makes Perfect, Where do we Stand?', Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 45, no. 1, 3, pp. 39–64. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04503

If Practice Makes Perfect, Where do we Stand? / Galletta, Dennis F.; Bjørn-Andersen, Niels; Leidner, Dorothy E.; Markus, M. Lynne; McLean, Ephraim R.; Straub, Detmar; Wetherbe, James.

In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 45, No. 1, 3, 2019, p. 39–64.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - If Practice Makes Perfect, Where do we Stand?

AU - Galletta, Dennis F.

AU - Bjørn-Andersen, Niels

AU - Leidner, Dorothy E.

AU - Markus, M. Lynne

AU - McLean, Ephraim R.

AU - Straub, Detmar

AU - Wetherbe, James

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Practitioners have played an important role in the information system (IS) field’s development since its beginnings. In the 1970s, IS researchers’ integration with practitioners was high with Society for Information Management members receiving copies of the MIS Quarterly, practitioners funding the ICIS Doctoral Consortium, and submissions receiving at least one practitioner review. Today, however, the integration between practitioners and researchers appears more distant. Given that almost 50 years have passed since the field’s development, we believe that we need to reflect on the past, present, and future relationship between IS research and IS practice. Has the distance between academics and practitioners become too great? Is our relevance too low to expect practitioners to join AIS and attend our conferences? How might we increase the integration? At a panel at ICIS 2018, several panelists provided position statements about those issues.

AB - Practitioners have played an important role in the information system (IS) field’s development since its beginnings. In the 1970s, IS researchers’ integration with practitioners was high with Society for Information Management members receiving copies of the MIS Quarterly, practitioners funding the ICIS Doctoral Consortium, and submissions receiving at least one practitioner review. Today, however, the integration between practitioners and researchers appears more distant. Given that almost 50 years have passed since the field’s development, we believe that we need to reflect on the past, present, and future relationship between IS research and IS practice. Has the distance between academics and practitioners become too great? Is our relevance too low to expect practitioners to join AIS and attend our conferences? How might we increase the integration? At a panel at ICIS 2018, several panelists provided position statements about those issues.

KW - Research

KW - Practice

KW - Integration

KW - Relevance

KW - Relevance vs. rigor

KW - Research

KW - Practice

KW - Integration

KW - Relevance

KW - Relevance vs. rigor

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=111029865917004&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.17705/1CAIS.04503

DO - 10.17705/1CAIS.04503

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 39

EP - 64

JO - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

JF - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

SN - 1529-3181

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -