How to Deal with Negativity Power Price Spikes? Flexible Voluntary Curtailment Agreements for Large-Scale Integration of Wind

Christine Brandstätt, Gert Brunekreeft*, Katy Jahnke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For the large-scale integration of electricity from renewable energy sources (RES-E), the German system seems to reach its limits. In 2009, the electricity wholesale market experienced serious negative prices at times of high wind and low demand. The feed-in system in Germany consists of a fixed feed-in price, a take-off obligation and a RES priority rule, and in practice only very restrictive use of RES-E curtailment. Exactly the latter is the problem. We argue that the overall performance of the system would improve seriously by lifting the restrictions on the use of voluntary curtailment agreements, while retaining the priority rule as such. Since generators of RES-E can only improve under this system reform, investment conditions improve, leading to higher installed RES-E capacity. This in turn implies that reduced wind output due to curtailment can actually be offset by higher wind output in all periods in which there is no problem.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume39
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)3732-3740
Number of pages9
ISSN0301-4215
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Renewable energies
  • Market design
  • Feed-in-system

Cite this