How "Sociotechnical" is our IS Research? An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward

Suprateek Sarker, Sutirtha Chatterjee, Xiao Xiao

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper seeks to offer an assessment on the extent to which we, as IS academics, have been faithful to sociotechnical paradigm, often considered as a fundamental guiding frame for the discipline. As a first step, the paper identifies eight ways in which the technical and the social are featured in the IS literature. Having done so, the paper provides a critical commentary on whether, and in what sense, we have been true to the sociotechnical framework. Finally, the paper offers some ideas for the IS community to reflect on regarding how to move forward with respect to sociotechnical framing of IS research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013
    EditorsRichard Baskerville, Michael Chau
    Number of pages24
    Place of PublicationAtlanta, GA
    PublisherAssociation for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)
    Publication date2013
    Article number1185
    ISBN (Print)9780615933832
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    EventThe 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013: Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design - Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy
    Duration: 15 Dec 201318 Dec 2013
    Conference number: 34
    http://icis2013.aisnet.org/

    Conference

    ConferenceThe 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013
    Number34
    LocationUniversità Bocconi
    CountryItaly
    CityMilan
    Period15/12/201318/12/2013
    Internet address

    Cite this

    Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., & Xiao, X. (2013). How "Sociotechnical" is our IS Research? An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward. In R. Baskerville, & M. Chau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013 [1185] Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
    Sarker, Suprateek ; Chatterjee, Sutirtha ; Xiao, Xiao. / How "Sociotechnical" is our IS Research? An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013. editor / Richard Baskerville ; Michael Chau. Atlanta, GA : Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013.
    @inproceedings{a8f37281b8e040c895ed1f80d1202340,
    title = "How {"}Sociotechnical{"} is our IS Research?: An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward",
    abstract = "This paper seeks to offer an assessment on the extent to which we, as IS academics, have been faithful to sociotechnical paradigm, often considered as a fundamental guiding frame for the discipline. As a first step, the paper identifies eight ways in which the technical and the social are featured in the IS literature. Having done so, the paper provides a critical commentary on whether, and in what sense, we have been true to the sociotechnical framework. Finally, the paper offers some ideas for the IS community to reflect on regarding how to move forward with respect to sociotechnical framing of IS research.",
    keywords = "IS Research, IS Discipline, Sociotechnical, Assessment, Recommendation",
    author = "Suprateek Sarker and Sutirtha Chatterjee and Xiao Xiao",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9780615933832",
    editor = "Baskerville, {Richard } and Chau, {Michael }",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013",
    publisher = "Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)",

    }

    Sarker, S, Chatterjee, S & Xiao, X 2013, How "Sociotechnical" is our IS Research? An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward. in R Baskerville & M Chau (eds), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013., 1185, Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Atlanta, GA, Milan, Italy, 15/12/2013.

    How "Sociotechnical" is our IS Research? An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward. / Sarker, Suprateek ; Chatterjee, Sutirtha; Xiao, Xiao.

    Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013. ed. / Richard Baskerville; Michael Chau. Atlanta, GA : Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013. 1185.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - How "Sociotechnical" is our IS Research?

    T2 - An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward

    AU - Sarker, Suprateek

    AU - Chatterjee, Sutirtha

    AU - Xiao, Xiao

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This paper seeks to offer an assessment on the extent to which we, as IS academics, have been faithful to sociotechnical paradigm, often considered as a fundamental guiding frame for the discipline. As a first step, the paper identifies eight ways in which the technical and the social are featured in the IS literature. Having done so, the paper provides a critical commentary on whether, and in what sense, we have been true to the sociotechnical framework. Finally, the paper offers some ideas for the IS community to reflect on regarding how to move forward with respect to sociotechnical framing of IS research.

    AB - This paper seeks to offer an assessment on the extent to which we, as IS academics, have been faithful to sociotechnical paradigm, often considered as a fundamental guiding frame for the discipline. As a first step, the paper identifies eight ways in which the technical and the social are featured in the IS literature. Having done so, the paper provides a critical commentary on whether, and in what sense, we have been true to the sociotechnical framework. Finally, the paper offers some ideas for the IS community to reflect on regarding how to move forward with respect to sociotechnical framing of IS research.

    KW - IS Research

    KW - IS Discipline

    KW - Sociotechnical

    KW - Assessment

    KW - Recommendation

    M3 - Article in proceedings

    SN - 9780615933832

    BT - Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013

    A2 - Baskerville, Richard

    A2 - Chau, Michael

    PB - Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)

    CY - Atlanta, GA

    ER -

    Sarker S, Chatterjee S, Xiao X. How "Sociotechnical" is our IS Research? An Assessment and Possible Ways Forward. In Baskerville R, Chau M, editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). 2013. 1185