How Do Professionals Perceive the Governance of Public–private Partnerships? Evidence from Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark

Rianne Warsen*, Carsten Greve, Erik Hans Klijn, Joop F.M. Koppenjan, Matti Siemiatycki

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In public–private partnerships (PPPs), the collaboration between public and private actors can be complicated. With partners coming from different institutional backgrounds and with different interests, governing these partnerships is important to ensure the projects' progress. There is, however, little knowledge about the perceptions of professionals regarding the governance of PPPs. This study aims to exlore professionals' viewpoints about governing PPPs, and to explain potential differences using four theoretical governance paradigms. Using Q methodology, the preferences of 119 public and private professionals in Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark are explored. Results show four different viewpoints regarding the governance of PPPs. Experience, country and the public–private distinction seem to influence these viewpoints. Knowledge of these differences can inform efforts to govern PPPs and contribute to more successful partnerships.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Administration
Number of pages16
ISSN0033-3298
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Oct 2019

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 03 September 2019

Cite this

@article{dc43de64bad1448896ca72ab62b1fedd,
title = "How Do Professionals Perceive the Governance of Public–private Partnerships?: Evidence from Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark",
abstract = "In public–private partnerships (PPPs), the collaboration between public and private actors can be complicated. With partners coming from different institutional backgrounds and with different interests, governing these partnerships is important to ensure the projects' progress. There is, however, little knowledge about the perceptions of professionals regarding the governance of PPPs. This study aims to exlore professionals' viewpoints about governing PPPs, and to explain potential differences using four theoretical governance paradigms. Using Q methodology, the preferences of 119 public and private professionals in Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark are explored. Results show four different viewpoints regarding the governance of PPPs. Experience, country and the public–private distinction seem to influence these viewpoints. Knowledge of these differences can inform efforts to govern PPPs and contribute to more successful partnerships.",
author = "Rianne Warsen and Carsten Greve and Klijn, {Erik Hans} and Koppenjan, {Joop F.M.} and Matti Siemiatycki",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 03 September 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1111/padm.12626",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",

}

How Do Professionals Perceive the Governance of Public–private Partnerships? Evidence from Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark. / Warsen, Rianne; Greve, Carsten; Klijn, Erik Hans; Koppenjan, Joop F.M.; Siemiatycki, Matti.

In: Public Administration, 08.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Do Professionals Perceive the Governance of Public–private Partnerships?

T2 - Evidence from Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark

AU - Warsen, Rianne

AU - Greve, Carsten

AU - Klijn, Erik Hans

AU - Koppenjan, Joop F.M.

AU - Siemiatycki, Matti

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 03 September 2019

PY - 2019/10/8

Y1 - 2019/10/8

N2 - In public–private partnerships (PPPs), the collaboration between public and private actors can be complicated. With partners coming from different institutional backgrounds and with different interests, governing these partnerships is important to ensure the projects' progress. There is, however, little knowledge about the perceptions of professionals regarding the governance of PPPs. This study aims to exlore professionals' viewpoints about governing PPPs, and to explain potential differences using four theoretical governance paradigms. Using Q methodology, the preferences of 119 public and private professionals in Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark are explored. Results show four different viewpoints regarding the governance of PPPs. Experience, country and the public–private distinction seem to influence these viewpoints. Knowledge of these differences can inform efforts to govern PPPs and contribute to more successful partnerships.

AB - In public–private partnerships (PPPs), the collaboration between public and private actors can be complicated. With partners coming from different institutional backgrounds and with different interests, governing these partnerships is important to ensure the projects' progress. There is, however, little knowledge about the perceptions of professionals regarding the governance of PPPs. This study aims to exlore professionals' viewpoints about governing PPPs, and to explain potential differences using four theoretical governance paradigms. Using Q methodology, the preferences of 119 public and private professionals in Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark are explored. Results show four different viewpoints regarding the governance of PPPs. Experience, country and the public–private distinction seem to influence these viewpoints. Knowledge of these differences can inform efforts to govern PPPs and contribute to more successful partnerships.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925436483&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/padm.12626

DO - 10.1111/padm.12626

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85073991043

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

ER -