How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards?

Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative

Laurence Vigneau, Michael Humphreys, Jeremy Moon

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Business Ethics
    Volume131
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)469-486
    Number of pages18
    ISSN0167-4544
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Cite this

    @article{c1e0dcadad564733acf79ab73a83b5bb,
    title = "How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards?: Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative",
    abstract = "This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.",
    keywords = "Compliance, Corporate social responsibility, Global Reporting Initiative, Qualitative case study, Standardization, Translation",
    author = "Laurence Vigneau and Michael Humphreys and Jeremy Moon",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5",
    language = "English",
    volume = "131",
    pages = "469--486",
    journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
    issn = "0167-4544",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. / Vigneau, Laurence; Humphreys, Michael; Moon, Jeremy.

    In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 131, No. 2, 2015, p. 469-486.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards?

    T2 - Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative

    AU - Vigneau, Laurence

    AU - Humphreys, Michael

    AU - Moon, Jeremy

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.

    AB - This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.

    KW - Compliance

    KW - Corporate social responsibility

    KW - Global Reporting Initiative

    KW - Qualitative case study

    KW - Standardization

    KW - Translation

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376712&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5

    DO - 10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 131

    SP - 469

    EP - 486

    JO - Journal of Business Ethics

    JF - Journal of Business Ethics

    SN - 0167-4544

    IS - 2

    ER -