How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards?: Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative

Laurence Vigneau, Michael Humphreys, Jeremy Moon

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.
    This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Business Ethics
    Volume131
    Issue number2
    Pages469-486
    Number of pages18
    ISSN0167-4544
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2015

    Keywords

      Cite this

      @article{c1e0dcadad564733acf79ab73a83b5bb,
      title = "How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards?: Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative",
      abstract = "This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.",
      keywords = "Compliance, Corporate social responsibility, Global Reporting Initiative, Qualitative case study, Standardization, Translation",
      author = "Laurence Vigneau and Michael Humphreys and Jeremy Moon",
      year = "2015",
      doi = "10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5",
      language = "English",
      volume = "131",
      pages = "469--486",
      journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
      issn = "0167-4544",
      publisher = "Springer",
      number = "2",

      }

      How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. / Vigneau, Laurence; Humphreys, Michael; Moon, Jeremy.

      In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 131, No. 2, 2015, p. 469-486.

      Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

      TY - JOUR

      T1 - How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards?

      T2 - Journal of Business Ethics

      AU - Vigneau,Laurence

      AU - Humphreys,Michael

      AU - Moon,Jeremy

      PY - 2015

      Y1 - 2015

      N2 - This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.

      AB - This paper addresses the issue of the influence of global governance institutions, particularly international sustainability standards, on a firm’s intra-organizational practices. More precisely, we provide an exploratory empirical view of the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) on a multinational corporation’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) management practices. We investigate standard compliance by comparing the stated intention of the use of the GRI with its actual use and the consequent effects within the firm. Based on an in-depth case study, our findings illustrate the processes and consequences of the translation of the GRI within the organization. We show that substantive standard adoption can lead to unintended consequences on CSR management practices; specifically it can influence the management structure and CSR committee function; the choice of CSR activities, the relationships between subsidiaries, the temporal dimension of CSR management and the interpretation of CSR performance. We also highlight the need to look at the relationship dynamics (or lack of) between standards. Finally, we illustrate and discuss the role of reporting and its influence on management in order to better understand the internal issues arising from compliance with standards.

      KW - Compliance

      KW - Corporate social responsibility

      KW - Global Reporting Initiative

      KW - Qualitative case study

      KW - Standardization

      KW - Translation

      UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376712&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

      U2 - 10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5

      DO - 10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5

      M3 - Journal article

      VL - 131

      SP - 469

      EP - 486

      JO - Journal of Business Ethics

      JF - Journal of Business Ethics

      SN - 0167-4544

      IS - 2

      ER -