How do Analogizing and Mental Simulation Influence Team Dynamics in Innovative Product Design?

Hernan Casakin, Linden J. Ball, Bo T. Christensen, Petra Badke-Schaub

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to gain further insight into how analogical reasoning and mental simulation, two cognitive strategies, influence team dynamics in innovative product design. A particular emphasis was placed on exploring the association between these two strategies and team cohesion and team collaboration. Analogies were coded for “analogical distance” (i.e., within domain or between domain) and “analogical purpose” (i.e., problem identification, function finding, solution generation, and explanation). The results indicated that the presence of either analogizing or mental simulation was related to team cohesion and team collaboration, with mental simulation having an especially marked association with team collaboration. Within-domain analogizing was found to enhance team collaboration, but it did not influence team cohesion. Furthermore, all types of analogical purpose showed a similar association with team cohesion, whereas solution generation and function finding had a stronger association with team collaboration. We propose that analogizing and mental simulations are strategies that serve valuable functions in engendering enhanced cohesion and collaboration, which might be expected to lead to more effective design outcomes, although this remains an empirical question in need of further corroboration.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
Volume29
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)173-183
Number of pages11
ISSN0890-0604
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{fa9a506d62014d05b6ba58d3627903ec,
title = "How do Analogizing and Mental Simulation Influence Team Dynamics in Innovative Product Design?",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to gain further insight into how analogical reasoning and mental simulation, two cognitive strategies, influence team dynamics in innovative product design. A particular emphasis was placed on exploring the association between these two strategies and team cohesion and team collaboration. Analogies were coded for “analogical distance” (i.e., within domain or between domain) and “analogical purpose” (i.e., problem identification, function finding, solution generation, and explanation). The results indicated that the presence of either analogizing or mental simulation was related to team cohesion and team collaboration, with mental simulation having an especially marked association with team collaboration. Within-domain analogizing was found to enhance team collaboration, but it did not influence team cohesion. Furthermore, all types of analogical purpose showed a similar association with team cohesion, whereas solution generation and function finding had a stronger association with team collaboration. We propose that analogizing and mental simulations are strategies that serve valuable functions in engendering enhanced cohesion and collaboration, which might be expected to lead to more effective design outcomes, although this remains an empirical question in need of further corroboration.",
keywords = "Analogical reasoning, Engineering design, Mental simulation, Team cohesion, Team collaboration",
author = "Hernan Casakin and Ball, {Linden J.} and Christensen, {Bo T.} and Petra Badke-Schaub",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1017/S0890060415000050",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "173--183",
journal = "Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing",
issn = "0890-0604",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

How do Analogizing and Mental Simulation Influence Team Dynamics in Innovative Product Design? / Casakin, Hernan; Ball, Linden J.; Christensen, Bo T. ; Badke-Schaub, Petra.

In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2015, p. 173-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do Analogizing and Mental Simulation Influence Team Dynamics in Innovative Product Design?

AU - Casakin, Hernan

AU - Ball, Linden J.

AU - Christensen, Bo T.

AU - Badke-Schaub, Petra

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The aim of this study was to gain further insight into how analogical reasoning and mental simulation, two cognitive strategies, influence team dynamics in innovative product design. A particular emphasis was placed on exploring the association between these two strategies and team cohesion and team collaboration. Analogies were coded for “analogical distance” (i.e., within domain or between domain) and “analogical purpose” (i.e., problem identification, function finding, solution generation, and explanation). The results indicated that the presence of either analogizing or mental simulation was related to team cohesion and team collaboration, with mental simulation having an especially marked association with team collaboration. Within-domain analogizing was found to enhance team collaboration, but it did not influence team cohesion. Furthermore, all types of analogical purpose showed a similar association with team cohesion, whereas solution generation and function finding had a stronger association with team collaboration. We propose that analogizing and mental simulations are strategies that serve valuable functions in engendering enhanced cohesion and collaboration, which might be expected to lead to more effective design outcomes, although this remains an empirical question in need of further corroboration.

AB - The aim of this study was to gain further insight into how analogical reasoning and mental simulation, two cognitive strategies, influence team dynamics in innovative product design. A particular emphasis was placed on exploring the association between these two strategies and team cohesion and team collaboration. Analogies were coded for “analogical distance” (i.e., within domain or between domain) and “analogical purpose” (i.e., problem identification, function finding, solution generation, and explanation). The results indicated that the presence of either analogizing or mental simulation was related to team cohesion and team collaboration, with mental simulation having an especially marked association with team collaboration. Within-domain analogizing was found to enhance team collaboration, but it did not influence team cohesion. Furthermore, all types of analogical purpose showed a similar association with team cohesion, whereas solution generation and function finding had a stronger association with team collaboration. We propose that analogizing and mental simulations are strategies that serve valuable functions in engendering enhanced cohesion and collaboration, which might be expected to lead to more effective design outcomes, although this remains an empirical question in need of further corroboration.

KW - Analogical reasoning

KW - Engineering design

KW - Mental simulation

KW - Team cohesion

KW - Team collaboration

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925334701&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1017/S0890060415000050

DO - 10.1017/S0890060415000050

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 173

EP - 183

JO - Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing

JF - Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing

SN - 0890-0604

IS - 2

ER -