How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox

Nico Florian Klenne, Gerda Gemser, Ingo Karpen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence suggests that designers may be successful entrepreneurs. When designers become business founders and engage in strategic decision-making, they may encounter a strategic paradox. This paradox arises from pursuing interdependent, yet contradictory goals: optimising one single innovation outcome (desirability) versus satisficing multiple innovation outcomes (desirability, feasibility, and viability). We examine how designer-founders experience and manage the tensions resulting from this strategic paradox through a qualitative research design analysing secondary interview data. We find that the way designer-founders perceive their professional identity relates to their ability to effectively mitigate paradoxical tensions. Designer-founders who adopt a generalist role identity seem to be able to balance contradicting innovation outcomes and thereby mitigate tensions. On the other hand, designer-founders who assume a specialist role identity seem to focus on optimising desirability and avoid the experience of paradoxical tensions by erecting clear boundaries protecting their specialist role identity.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017 : Marketing for Impact
EditorsLinda Robinson, Linda Brennan, Mike Reid
Number of pages1
Place of PublicationMelbourne
PublisherRMIT University
Publication date2017
Pages346
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventThe Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. ANZMAC 2017: Marketing for Impact - RMIT - Swanston Academic Building , Melbourne, Australia
Duration: 1 Dec 20176 Dec 2017
https://www.rmit.edu.au/events/all-events/conferences/2017/december/anzmac

Conference

ConferenceThe Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. ANZMAC 2017
LocationRMIT - Swanston Academic Building
CountryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period01/12/201706/12/2017
Internet address
SeriesProceedings of the ANZMAC Conference
ISSN1447-3275

Keywords

  • Role identity
  • Innovation paradox
  • Designer-founders

Cite this

Klenne, N. F., Gemser, G., & Karpen, I. (2017). How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox. In L. Robinson, L. Brennan, & M. Reid (Eds.), Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017: Marketing for Impact (pp. 346). Melbourne: RMIT University. Proceedings of the ANZMAC Conference
Klenne, Nico Florian ; Gemser, Gerda ; Karpen, Ingo. / How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017: Marketing for Impact. editor / Linda Robinson ; Linda Brennan ; Mike Reid. Melbourne : RMIT University, 2017. pp. 346 (Proceedings of the ANZMAC Conference).
@inbook{7f16f671a00f4c8da026cd4fd710f326,
title = "How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox",
abstract = "Anecdotal evidence suggests that designers may be successful entrepreneurs. When designers become business founders and engage in strategic decision-making, they may encounter a strategic paradox. This paradox arises from pursuing interdependent, yet contradictory goals: optimising one single innovation outcome (desirability) versus satisficing multiple innovation outcomes (desirability, feasibility, and viability). We examine how designer-founders experience and manage the tensions resulting from this strategic paradox through a qualitative research design analysing secondary interview data. We find that the way designer-founders perceive their professional identity relates to their ability to effectively mitigate paradoxical tensions. Designer-founders who adopt a generalist role identity seem to be able to balance contradicting innovation outcomes and thereby mitigate tensions. On the other hand, designer-founders who assume a specialist role identity seem to focus on optimising desirability and avoid the experience of paradoxical tensions by erecting clear boundaries protecting their specialist role identity.",
keywords = "Role identity, Innovation paradox, Designer-founders, Role identity, Innovation paradox, Designer-founders",
author = "Klenne, {Nico Florian} and Gerda Gemser and Ingo Karpen",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
series = "Proceedings of the ANZMAC Conference",
publisher = "RMIT University",
pages = "346",
editor = "Linda Robinson and Linda Brennan and Mike Reid",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017",
address = "Australia",

}

Klenne, NF, Gemser, G & Karpen, I 2017, How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox. in L Robinson, L Brennan & M Reid (eds), Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017: Marketing for Impact. RMIT University, Melbourne, Proceedings of the ANZMAC Conference, pp. 346, The Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. ANZMAC 2017, Melbourne, Australia, 01/12/2017.

How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox. / Klenne, Nico Florian; Gemser, Gerda; Karpen, Ingo.

Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017: Marketing for Impact. ed. / Linda Robinson; Linda Brennan; Mike Reid. Melbourne : RMIT University, 2017. p. 346 (Proceedings of the ANZMAC Conference).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - ABST

T1 - How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox

AU - Klenne, Nico Florian

AU - Gemser, Gerda

AU - Karpen, Ingo

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Anecdotal evidence suggests that designers may be successful entrepreneurs. When designers become business founders and engage in strategic decision-making, they may encounter a strategic paradox. This paradox arises from pursuing interdependent, yet contradictory goals: optimising one single innovation outcome (desirability) versus satisficing multiple innovation outcomes (desirability, feasibility, and viability). We examine how designer-founders experience and manage the tensions resulting from this strategic paradox through a qualitative research design analysing secondary interview data. We find that the way designer-founders perceive their professional identity relates to their ability to effectively mitigate paradoxical tensions. Designer-founders who adopt a generalist role identity seem to be able to balance contradicting innovation outcomes and thereby mitigate tensions. On the other hand, designer-founders who assume a specialist role identity seem to focus on optimising desirability and avoid the experience of paradoxical tensions by erecting clear boundaries protecting their specialist role identity.

AB - Anecdotal evidence suggests that designers may be successful entrepreneurs. When designers become business founders and engage in strategic decision-making, they may encounter a strategic paradox. This paradox arises from pursuing interdependent, yet contradictory goals: optimising one single innovation outcome (desirability) versus satisficing multiple innovation outcomes (desirability, feasibility, and viability). We examine how designer-founders experience and manage the tensions resulting from this strategic paradox through a qualitative research design analysing secondary interview data. We find that the way designer-founders perceive their professional identity relates to their ability to effectively mitigate paradoxical tensions. Designer-founders who adopt a generalist role identity seem to be able to balance contradicting innovation outcomes and thereby mitigate tensions. On the other hand, designer-founders who assume a specialist role identity seem to focus on optimising desirability and avoid the experience of paradoxical tensions by erecting clear boundaries protecting their specialist role identity.

KW - Role identity

KW - Innovation paradox

KW - Designer-founders

KW - Role identity

KW - Innovation paradox

KW - Designer-founders

M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings

T3 - Proceedings of the ANZMAC Conference

SP - 346

BT - Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017

A2 - Robinson, Linda

A2 - Brennan, Linda

A2 - Reid, Mike

PB - RMIT University

CY - Melbourne

ER -

Klenne NF, Gemser G, Karpen I. How Designer-founders Manage the Innovation Paradox. In Robinson L, Brennan L, Reid M, editors, Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC) 2017: Marketing for Impact. Melbourne: RMIT University. 2017. p. 346. (Proceedings of the ANZMAC Conference).