Abstract
government, we argue that the neologism ‘governmentality’ can be used to investigate that which we would normally term ‘the state’ without assuming its existence as an given entity.
This article focuses on Foucault’s notions of statification and the state as a practicoreflexive prism and uses Giorgio Agamben’s critique of Foucault’s governmentality-approach as a stepping-stone to re-investigate Foucault as a thinker of the state. A Foucualdian theory of the state emphasises how the state is a fictitious entity, constantly produced and reproduced by processes and practices of administration and acclamation, and yet necessary in order for the multiplicity of governmental power relations in modern societies to function
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2018 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Event | Concepts of Power - Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark Duration: 26 Apr 2018 → 26 Apr 2018 |
Workshop
| Workshop | Concepts of Power |
|---|---|
| Location | Copenhagen Business School |
| Country | Denmark |
| City | Frederiksberg |
| Period | 26/04/2018 → 26/04/2018 |
Bibliographical note
CBS Library does not have access to the materialCite this
}
Governmentality, Statification and the State as a Practico-reflexive Prism : Towards a Foucauldian Theory of the State . / Hein Jessen, Mathias ; von Eggers, Nicolai .
2018. Paper presented at Concepts of Power, Frederiksberg, Denmark.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review
TY - CONF
T1 - Governmentality, Statification and the State as a Practico-reflexive Prism
T2 - Towards a Foucauldian Theory of the State
AU - Hein Jessen, Mathias
AU - von Eggers, Nicolai
N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Michel Foucault’s ‘governmentality’-approach has often been used to investigate practices and technologies of government beyond, beside or beneath the (national, sovereign) state. However, even though Foucault himself was mostly interested in concrete practices and technologies ofgovernment, we argue that the neologism ‘governmentality’ can be used to investigate that which we would normally term ‘the state’ without assuming its existence as an given entity.This article focuses on Foucault’s notions of statification and the state as a practicoreflexive prism and uses Giorgio Agamben’s critique of Foucault’s governmentality-approach as a stepping-stone to re-investigate Foucault as a thinker of the state. A Foucualdian theory of the state emphasises how the state is a fictitious entity, constantly produced and reproduced by processes and practices of administration and acclamation, and yet necessary in order for the multiplicity of governmental power relations in modern societies to function
AB - Michel Foucault’s ‘governmentality’-approach has often been used to investigate practices and technologies of government beyond, beside or beneath the (national, sovereign) state. However, even though Foucault himself was mostly interested in concrete practices and technologies ofgovernment, we argue that the neologism ‘governmentality’ can be used to investigate that which we would normally term ‘the state’ without assuming its existence as an given entity.This article focuses on Foucault’s notions of statification and the state as a practicoreflexive prism and uses Giorgio Agamben’s critique of Foucault’s governmentality-approach as a stepping-stone to re-investigate Foucault as a thinker of the state. A Foucualdian theory of the state emphasises how the state is a fictitious entity, constantly produced and reproduced by processes and practices of administration and acclamation, and yet necessary in order for the multiplicity of governmental power relations in modern societies to function
M3 - Paper
ER -