Governmentalities of CSR: Danish Government Policy as a Reflection of Political Difference

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates the roles that Danish government has played in the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Denmark has emerged as a first mover among the Scandinavian countries when it comes to CSR. We argue that government has played a pivotal role in making this happen, and that this reflects strong traditions of regulation, corporatism and active state involvement. However, there is no unitary “Danish model of CSR” being promoted by government. Although Danish society is often associated with a model of consensus, our claim is that Danish government policy on CSR is characterized by a lack of common direction and that we need to approach it on such terms. In order to provide a critical account of ‘the Danish model’ we apply a governmentality perspective that allows us to stress political difference. We argue that Danish government policy consists of three distinct regimes of practice and show how they subject CSR to different modes of rationalization and action. We conclude that the problem with public policy being split into three is not different as such, but the failure of each regime to recognize the value of the others. As a result, government tends to add to the confusion and opaqueness of CSR.
This paper investigates the roles that Danish government has played in the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Denmark has emerged as a first mover among the Scandinavian countries when it comes to CSR. We argue that government has played a pivotal role in making this happen, and that this reflects strong traditions of regulation, corporatism and active state involvement. However, there is no unitary “Danish model of CSR” being promoted by government. Although Danish society is often associated with a model of consensus, our claim is that Danish government policy on CSR is characterized by a lack of common direction and that we need to approach it on such terms. In order to provide a critical account of ‘the Danish model’ we apply a governmentality perspective that allows us to stress political difference. We argue that Danish government policy consists of three distinct regimes of practice and show how they subject CSR to different modes of rationalization and action. We conclude that the problem with public policy being split into three is not different as such, but the failure of each regime to recognize the value of the others. As a result, government tends to add to the confusion and opaqueness of CSR.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume127
Issue number1
Pages33-47
Number of pages15
ISSN0167-4544
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

    Cite this

    @article{0b4975f1a531489497796ffaa97a9e45,
    title = "Governmentalities of CSR: Danish Government Policy as a Reflection of Political Difference",
    abstract = "This paper investigates the roles that Danish government has played in the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Denmark has emerged as a first mover among the Scandinavian countries when it comes to CSR. We argue that government has played a pivotal role in making this happen, and that this reflects strong traditions of regulation, corporatism and active state involvement. However, there is no unitary “Danish model of CSR” being promoted by government. Although Danish society is often associated with a model of consensus, our claim is that Danish government policy on CSR is characterized by a lack of common direction and that we need to approach it on such terms. In order to provide a critical account of ‘the Danish model’ we apply a governmentality perspective that allows us to stress political difference. We argue that Danish government policy consists of three distinct regimes of practice and show how they subject CSR to different modes of rationalization and action. We conclude that the problem with public policy being split into three is not different as such, but the failure of each regime to recognize the value of the others. As a result, government tends to add to the confusion and opaqueness of CSR.",
    keywords = "Corporate social responsibility, Government, Governance, Governmentality, Inclusiveness, Competitiveness, Accountability",
    author = "Steen Vallentin",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1007/s10551-013-1703-5",
    language = "English",
    volume = "127",
    pages = "33--47",
    journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
    issn = "0167-4544",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "1",

    }

    Governmentalities of CSR : Danish Government Policy as a Reflection of Political Difference. / Vallentin, Steen.

    In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 127, No. 1, 2015, p. 33-47.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Governmentalities of CSR

    T2 - Journal of Business Ethics

    AU - Vallentin,Steen

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - This paper investigates the roles that Danish government has played in the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Denmark has emerged as a first mover among the Scandinavian countries when it comes to CSR. We argue that government has played a pivotal role in making this happen, and that this reflects strong traditions of regulation, corporatism and active state involvement. However, there is no unitary “Danish model of CSR” being promoted by government. Although Danish society is often associated with a model of consensus, our claim is that Danish government policy on CSR is characterized by a lack of common direction and that we need to approach it on such terms. In order to provide a critical account of ‘the Danish model’ we apply a governmentality perspective that allows us to stress political difference. We argue that Danish government policy consists of three distinct regimes of practice and show how they subject CSR to different modes of rationalization and action. We conclude that the problem with public policy being split into three is not different as such, but the failure of each regime to recognize the value of the others. As a result, government tends to add to the confusion and opaqueness of CSR.

    AB - This paper investigates the roles that Danish government has played in the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Denmark has emerged as a first mover among the Scandinavian countries when it comes to CSR. We argue that government has played a pivotal role in making this happen, and that this reflects strong traditions of regulation, corporatism and active state involvement. However, there is no unitary “Danish model of CSR” being promoted by government. Although Danish society is often associated with a model of consensus, our claim is that Danish government policy on CSR is characterized by a lack of common direction and that we need to approach it on such terms. In order to provide a critical account of ‘the Danish model’ we apply a governmentality perspective that allows us to stress political difference. We argue that Danish government policy consists of three distinct regimes of practice and show how they subject CSR to different modes of rationalization and action. We conclude that the problem with public policy being split into three is not different as such, but the failure of each regime to recognize the value of the others. As a result, government tends to add to the confusion and opaqueness of CSR.

    KW - Corporate social responsibility

    KW - Government

    KW - Governance

    KW - Governmentality

    KW - Inclusiveness

    KW - Competitiveness

    KW - Accountability

    U2 - 10.1007/s10551-013-1703-5

    DO - 10.1007/s10551-013-1703-5

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 127

    SP - 33

    EP - 47

    JO - Journal of Business Ethics

    JF - Journal of Business Ethics

    SN - 0167-4544

    IS - 1

    ER -