Good Enough to Teach? A Study of EMI Lecturers’ Language Skills and Metadiscourse

Louise Denver, Christian Jensen, Inger Mees, Charlotte Werther

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In a study conducted at the Copenhagen Business School, 1,794 students completed questionnaires on lectures given by 31 non-native English-speaking lecturers in 12 EMI programmes. They were asked to rate the lecture, the lecturer and the lecturer’s language. Statistical analyses revealed a correlation between the students’ perceptions of the lecturers’ general lecturing competence (defined as knowledge of subject and teaching skills) and their perceptions of their English language proficiency (Jensen et al. 2013). In return for their assistance, each lecturer received a feedback sheet on how to improve their communicative effectiveness. The feedback was given by experienced tutors of English who had extensive experience of teaching and assessing English in an everyday ELF context. This paper sets out to investigate what sort of recommendations were provided, concentrating on the 24 lecturers whose L1 was Danish. An examination of the tutors’ comments showed that they could be divided into two main categories: formal language skills and pragmatic or metadiscursive features. The observations on language features are presented using a slightly adapted version of Lavelle’s (2008) “good-enough-to-teach-model”, whilst the comments on metadiscourse could be divided into four categories: sequential structure, hierarchical structure, connectives, and “fillers”. Although some ELF research has suggested that effectiveness in ELF settings depends more on pragmatic ability than on language proficiency (Björkman 2010; Jenkins et al. 2011: 301), the analyses of the tutors’ comments to the 24 lecturers in the present study show that both aspects should be attributed importance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalModerna språk
Volume110
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)46-72
ISSN2000-3560
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • English-medium instruction
  • Metadiscourse
  • Discourse structure
  • Connectives
  • Formal language skills
  • Pronunciation
  • English as a lingua franca
  • University lecturers

Cite this

@article{627145689dbe4c049f3aa5091630de77,
title = "Good Enough to Teach?: A Study of EMI Lecturers’ Language Skills and Metadiscourse",
abstract = "In a study conducted at the Copenhagen Business School, 1,794 students completed questionnaires on lectures given by 31 non-native English-speaking lecturers in 12 EMI programmes. They were asked to rate the lecture, the lecturer and the lecturer’s language. Statistical analyses revealed a correlation between the students’ perceptions of the lecturers’ general lecturing competence (defined as knowledge of subject and teaching skills) and their perceptions of their English language proficiency (Jensen et al. 2013). In return for their assistance, each lecturer received a feedback sheet on how to improve their communicative effectiveness. The feedback was given by experienced tutors of English who had extensive experience of teaching and assessing English in an everyday ELF context. This paper sets out to investigate what sort of recommendations were provided, concentrating on the 24 lecturers whose L1 was Danish. An examination of the tutors’ comments showed that they could be divided into two main categories: formal language skills and pragmatic or metadiscursive features. The observations on language features are presented using a slightly adapted version of Lavelle’s (2008) “good-enough-to-teach-model”, whilst the comments on metadiscourse could be divided into four categories: sequential structure, hierarchical structure, connectives, and “fillers”. Although some ELF research has suggested that effectiveness in ELF settings depends more on pragmatic ability than on language proficiency (Bj{\"o}rkman 2010; Jenkins et al. 2011: 301), the analyses of the tutors’ comments to the 24 lecturers in the present study show that both aspects should be attributed importance.",
keywords = "English-medium instruction, Metadiscourse, Discourse structure, Connectives, Formal language skills, Pronunciation, English as a lingua franca, University lecturers, English-medium instruction, Metadiscourse, Discourse structure, Connectives, Formal language skills, Pronunciation, English as a lingua franca, University lecturers",
author = "Louise Denver and Christian Jensen and Inger Mees and Charlotte Werther",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "46--72",
journal = "Moderna spr{\aa}k",
issn = "2000-3560",
publisher = "Moderna spr{\aa}k - Institutionen f{\"o}r moderna spr{\aa}k",
number = "2",

}

Good Enough to Teach? A Study of EMI Lecturers’ Language Skills and Metadiscourse. / Denver, Louise; Jensen, Christian; Mees, Inger; Werther, Charlotte.

In: Moderna språk, Vol. 110, No. 2, 2016, p. 46-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Good Enough to Teach?

T2 - A Study of EMI Lecturers’ Language Skills and Metadiscourse

AU - Denver, Louise

AU - Jensen, Christian

AU - Mees, Inger

AU - Werther, Charlotte

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In a study conducted at the Copenhagen Business School, 1,794 students completed questionnaires on lectures given by 31 non-native English-speaking lecturers in 12 EMI programmes. They were asked to rate the lecture, the lecturer and the lecturer’s language. Statistical analyses revealed a correlation between the students’ perceptions of the lecturers’ general lecturing competence (defined as knowledge of subject and teaching skills) and their perceptions of their English language proficiency (Jensen et al. 2013). In return for their assistance, each lecturer received a feedback sheet on how to improve their communicative effectiveness. The feedback was given by experienced tutors of English who had extensive experience of teaching and assessing English in an everyday ELF context. This paper sets out to investigate what sort of recommendations were provided, concentrating on the 24 lecturers whose L1 was Danish. An examination of the tutors’ comments showed that they could be divided into two main categories: formal language skills and pragmatic or metadiscursive features. The observations on language features are presented using a slightly adapted version of Lavelle’s (2008) “good-enough-to-teach-model”, whilst the comments on metadiscourse could be divided into four categories: sequential structure, hierarchical structure, connectives, and “fillers”. Although some ELF research has suggested that effectiveness in ELF settings depends more on pragmatic ability than on language proficiency (Björkman 2010; Jenkins et al. 2011: 301), the analyses of the tutors’ comments to the 24 lecturers in the present study show that both aspects should be attributed importance.

AB - In a study conducted at the Copenhagen Business School, 1,794 students completed questionnaires on lectures given by 31 non-native English-speaking lecturers in 12 EMI programmes. They were asked to rate the lecture, the lecturer and the lecturer’s language. Statistical analyses revealed a correlation between the students’ perceptions of the lecturers’ general lecturing competence (defined as knowledge of subject and teaching skills) and their perceptions of their English language proficiency (Jensen et al. 2013). In return for their assistance, each lecturer received a feedback sheet on how to improve their communicative effectiveness. The feedback was given by experienced tutors of English who had extensive experience of teaching and assessing English in an everyday ELF context. This paper sets out to investigate what sort of recommendations were provided, concentrating on the 24 lecturers whose L1 was Danish. An examination of the tutors’ comments showed that they could be divided into two main categories: formal language skills and pragmatic or metadiscursive features. The observations on language features are presented using a slightly adapted version of Lavelle’s (2008) “good-enough-to-teach-model”, whilst the comments on metadiscourse could be divided into four categories: sequential structure, hierarchical structure, connectives, and “fillers”. Although some ELF research has suggested that effectiveness in ELF settings depends more on pragmatic ability than on language proficiency (Björkman 2010; Jenkins et al. 2011: 301), the analyses of the tutors’ comments to the 24 lecturers in the present study show that both aspects should be attributed importance.

KW - English-medium instruction

KW - Metadiscourse

KW - Discourse structure

KW - Connectives

KW - Formal language skills

KW - Pronunciation

KW - English as a lingua franca

KW - University lecturers

KW - English-medium instruction

KW - Metadiscourse

KW - Discourse structure

KW - Connectives

KW - Formal language skills

KW - Pronunciation

KW - English as a lingua franca

KW - University lecturers

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925426200

M3 - Journal article

VL - 110

SP - 46

EP - 72

JO - Moderna språk

JF - Moderna språk

SN - 2000-3560

IS - 2

ER -