Gender, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Assessing and Refocusing a Conversation

Kate Grosser, Jeremy Moon, Julie A. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article reviews a conversation between business ethicists and feminist scholars begun in the early 1990s and traces the development of that conversation in relation to feminist theory. A bibliographic analysis of the business ethics (BE) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures over a twenty-five-year period elucidates the degree to which gender has been a salient concern, the methodologies adopted, and the ways in which gender has been analyzed (by geography, issue type, and theoretical perspective). Identifying significant limitations to the incorporation of feminist theory in these literatures, we discuss how feminist scholarship relating to behavior (through psychology and related fields), organizations (through feminist organization studies), and economics (through feminist economics) could be integrated. We suggest that a better integration of feminist theory would strengthen BE/CSR research, and point to new research directions and agendas arising from our approach.
This article reviews a conversation between business ethicists and feminist scholars begun in the early 1990s and traces the development of that conversation in relation to feminist theory. A bibliographic analysis of the business ethics (BE) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures over a twenty-five-year period elucidates the degree to which gender has been a salient concern, the methodologies adopted, and the ways in which gender has been analyzed (by geography, issue type, and theoretical perspective). Identifying significant limitations to the incorporation of feminist theory in these literatures, we discuss how feminist scholarship relating to behavior (through psychology and related fields), organizations (through feminist organization studies), and economics (through feminist economics) could be integrated. We suggest that a better integration of feminist theory would strengthen BE/CSR research, and point to new research directions and agendas arising from our approach.
LanguageEnglish
JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volume27
Issue number4
Pages541-567
ISSN1052-150X
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Business ethics
  • CSR
  • Feminism
  • Gender

Cite this

@article{ced54bb339ba4309a3a3f493538dfd68,
title = "Gender, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Assessing and Refocusing a Conversation",
abstract = "This article reviews a conversation between business ethicists and feminist scholars begun in the early 1990s and traces the development of that conversation in relation to feminist theory. A bibliographic analysis of the business ethics (BE) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures over a twenty-five-year period elucidates the degree to which gender has been a salient concern, the methodologies adopted, and the ways in which gender has been analyzed (by geography, issue type, and theoretical perspective). Identifying significant limitations to the incorporation of feminist theory in these literatures, we discuss how feminist scholarship relating to behavior (through psychology and related fields), organizations (through feminist organization studies), and economics (through feminist economics) could be integrated. We suggest that a better integration of feminist theory would strengthen BE/CSR research, and point to new research directions and agendas arising from our approach.",
keywords = "Business ethics, CSR, Feminism, Gender, Business ethics, CSR, Feminism, Gender",
author = "Kate Grosser and Jeremy Moon and Nelson, {Julie A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1017/beq.2017.42",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "541--567",
journal = "Business Ethics Quarterly",
issn = "1052-150X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Gender, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility : Assessing and Refocusing a Conversation. / Grosser, Kate; Moon, Jeremy; Nelson, Julie A.

In: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 4, 10.2017, p. 541-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility

T2 - Business Ethics Quarterly

AU - Grosser,Kate

AU - Moon,Jeremy

AU - Nelson,Julie A.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - This article reviews a conversation between business ethicists and feminist scholars begun in the early 1990s and traces the development of that conversation in relation to feminist theory. A bibliographic analysis of the business ethics (BE) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures over a twenty-five-year period elucidates the degree to which gender has been a salient concern, the methodologies adopted, and the ways in which gender has been analyzed (by geography, issue type, and theoretical perspective). Identifying significant limitations to the incorporation of feminist theory in these literatures, we discuss how feminist scholarship relating to behavior (through psychology and related fields), organizations (through feminist organization studies), and economics (through feminist economics) could be integrated. We suggest that a better integration of feminist theory would strengthen BE/CSR research, and point to new research directions and agendas arising from our approach.

AB - This article reviews a conversation between business ethicists and feminist scholars begun in the early 1990s and traces the development of that conversation in relation to feminist theory. A bibliographic analysis of the business ethics (BE) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures over a twenty-five-year period elucidates the degree to which gender has been a salient concern, the methodologies adopted, and the ways in which gender has been analyzed (by geography, issue type, and theoretical perspective). Identifying significant limitations to the incorporation of feminist theory in these literatures, we discuss how feminist scholarship relating to behavior (through psychology and related fields), organizations (through feminist organization studies), and economics (through feminist economics) could be integrated. We suggest that a better integration of feminist theory would strengthen BE/CSR research, and point to new research directions and agendas arising from our approach.

KW - Business ethics

KW - CSR

KW - Feminism

KW - Gender

KW - Business ethics

KW - CSR

KW - Feminism

KW - Gender

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921419504

U2 - 10.1017/beq.2017.42

DO - 10.1017/beq.2017.42

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 541

EP - 567

JO - Business Ethics Quarterly

JF - Business Ethics Quarterly

SN - 1052-150X

IS - 4

ER -